Change error code handling slightly in lo_setattr(). Right now we seem
to jump to out_err and assume that "errno" is valid and use that to
send reply.
But if caller has to do some other operations before jumping to out_err,
then it does the dance of first saving errno to saverr and the restore
errno before jumping to out_err. This makes it more confusing.
I am about to make more changes where caller will have to do some
work after error before jumping to out_err. I found it easier to
change the convention a bit. That is caller saves error in "saverr"
before jumping to out_err. And out_err uses "saverr" to send error
back and does not rely on "errno" having actual error.
v3: Resolved conflicts in lo_setattr() due to lo_inode_open() changes.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210208224024.43555-2-vgoyal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
1e08f164e9