block_job_cancel_async() did two things that were still block job
specific:
* Setting job->force. This field makes sense on the Job level, so we can
just move it. While at it, rename it to job->force_cancel to make its
purpose more obvious.
* Resetting the I/O status. This can't be moved because generic Jobs
don't have an I/O status. What the function really implements is a
user resume, except without entering the coroutine. Consequently, it
makes sense to call the .user_resume driver callback here which
already resets the I/O status.
The old block_job_cancel_async() has two separate if statements that
check job->iostatus != BLOCK_DEVICE_IO_STATUS_OK and job->user_paused.
However, the former condition always implies the latter (as is
asserted in block_job_iostatus_reset()), so changing the explicit call
of block_job_iostatus_reset() on the former condition with the
.user_resume callback on the latter condition is equivalent and
doesn't need to access any BlockJob specific state.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
004e95df98