Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Only free qsb that qemu_bufopen allocated, and also allow
qemu_bufopen accept qsb as input for write operation. It
will make the API more logical:
1.If you create the QEMUSizedBuffer yourself, you need to
free it by using qsb_free() but not depends on other API
like qemu_fclose.
2.allow qemu_bufopen() accept QEMUSizedBuffer as input for
write operation, otherwise, it will be a little strange
for this API won't accept the second parameter.
This brings API change, since there are only 3
users of this API currently, this change only impact the
first one which will be fixed in patch 2 of this patchset,
so I think it is safe to do this change.
1 70 tests/test-vmstate.c <<open_mem_file_read>>
return qemu_bufopen("r", qsb);
2 404 tests/test-vmstate.c <<test_save_noskip>>
QEMUFile *fsave = qemu_bufopen("w", NULL);
3 424 tests/test-vmstate.c <<test_save_skip>>
QEMUFile *fsave = qemu_bufopen("w", NULL);
Signed-off-by: Yang Hongyang <yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Cc: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
The splitting of qemu-file and addition of the buffered file landed
at the same time; so now split the buffered file code out.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
