In my "build everything" tree, changing hw/irq.h triggers a recompile
of some 5400 out of 6600 objects (not counting tests and objects that
don't depend on qemu/osdep.h).
hw/hw.h supposedly includes it for convenience. Several other headers
include it just to get qemu_irq and.or qemu_irq_handler.
Move the qemu_irq and qemu_irq_handler typedefs from hw/irq.h to
qemu/typedefs.h, and then include hw/irq.h only where it's still
needed. Touching it now recompiles only some 500 objects.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190812052359.30071-13-armbru@redhat.com>
For the IoTKit MPC support, we need to wire together the
interrupt outputs of 17 MPCs; this exceeds the current
value of MAX_OR_LINES. Increase MAX_OR_LINES to 32 (which
should be enough for anyone).
The tricky part is retaining the migration compatibility for
existing OR gates; we add a subsection which is only used
for larger OR gates, and define it such that we can freely
increase MAX_OR_LINES in future (or even move to a dynamically
allocated levels[] array without an upper size limit) without
breaking compatibility.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180604152941.20374-10-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The or-irq.h header file is missing the customary guard against
multiple inclusion, which means compilation fails if it gets
included twice. Fix the omission.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180220180325.29818-11-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The struct OrIRQState has an unused member field in_irqs.
This is a legacy of earlier versions of the patch; the
code that used it was dropped from the final version of
the code that went into master, but we forgot to delete
the no-longer-used struct field. Do so now.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
