Print a warning when mixing [+-]foo and foo=(on|off) in the -cpu
argument in a way that will break in the future.
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
SVM needs CPUID[0x8000000A] to be available. So if SVM is enabled
in a CPU model or explicitly in the command-line, adjust CPUID
xlevel to expose the CPUID[0x8000000A] leaf.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Instead of requiring users and management software to be aware of
required CPUID level/xlevel/xlevel2 values for each feature,
automatically increase those values when features need them.
This was already done for CPUID[7].EBX, and is now made generic
for all CPUID feature flags. Unit test included, to make sure we
don't break ABI on older machine-types and don't mess with the
CPUID level values if they are explicitly set by the user.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
We're going to change the way level/xlevel/xlevel2 are handled
when enabling features, but we need to keep the old behavior on
existing machine types. Add test cases for that.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Add test code that will check if the automatic CPUID level
changes are working as expected.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
