Current logic assumes that channel connections on the destination side are
always established in the same order as the source and the first one will
always be the main channel followed by the multifid or post-copy
preemption channel. This may not be always true, as even if a channel has a
connection established on the source side it can be in the pending state on
the destination side and a newer connection can be established first.
Basically causing out of order mapping of channels on the destination side.
Currently, all channels except post-copy preempt send a magic number, this
patch uses that magic number to decide the type of channel. This logic is
applicable only for precopy(multifd) live migration, as mentioned, the
post-copy preempt channel does not send any magic number. Also, tls live
migrations already does tls handshake before creating other channels, so
this issue is not possible with tls, hence this logic is avoided for tls
live migrations. This patch uses read peek to check the magic number of
channels so that current data/control stream management remains
un-effected.
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: manish.mishra <manish.mishra@nutanix.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
This patch allows the postcopy preempt channel to be created
asynchronously. The benefit is that when the connection is slow, we won't
take the BQL (and potentially block all things like QMP) for a long time
without releasing.
A function postcopy_preempt_wait_channel() is introduced, allowing the
migration thread to be able to wait on the channel creation. The channel
is always created by the main thread, in which we'll kick a new semaphore
to tell the migration thread that the channel has created.
We'll need to wait for the new channel in two places: (1) when there's a
new postcopy migration that is starting, or (2) when there's a postcopy
migration to resume.
For the start of migration, we don't need to wait for this channel until
when we want to start postcopy, aka, postcopy_start(). We'll fail the
migration if we found that the channel creation failed (which should
probably not happen at all in 99% of the cases, because the main channel is
using the same network topology).
For a postcopy recovery, we'll need to wait in postcopy_pause(). In that
case if the channel creation failed, we can't fail the migration or we'll
crash the VM, instead we keep in PAUSED state, waiting for yet another
recovery.
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Manish Mishra <manish.mishra@nutanix.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220707185509.27311-1-peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Create a new socket for postcopy to be prepared to send postcopy requested
pages via this specific channel, so as to not get blocked by precopy pages.
A new thread is also created on dest qemu to receive data from this new channel
based on the ram_load_postcopy() routine.
The ram_load_postcopy(POSTCOPY) branch and the thread has not started to
function, and that'll be done in follow up patches.
Cleanup the new sockets on both src/dst QEMUs, meanwhile look after the new
thread too to make sure it'll be recycled properly.
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220707185502.27149-1-peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
dgilbert: With Peter's fix to quieten compiler warning on
start_migration
Postcopy create threads. A common manner is we init a sem and use it to sync
with the thread. Namely, we have fault_thread_sem and listen_thread_sem and
they're only used for this.
Make it a shared infrastructure so it's easier to create yet another thread.
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220301083925.33483-7-peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
I found that there are many spelling errors in the comments of qemu,
so I used the spellcheck tool to check the spelling errors
and finally found some spelling errors in the migration folder.
Signed-off-by: zhaolichang <zhaolichang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200917075029.313-3-zhaolichang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Function postcopy_ram_incoming_setup and postcopy_ram_incoming_cleanup
is a pair. Rename to make it clear for audience.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20191010011316.31363-2-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
During migration, a tmp page is allocated so that we could place a whole
host page during postcopy.
Currently the page is allocated during load stage, this is a little bit
late. And more important, if we failed to allocate it, the error is not
checked properly. Even it is NULL, we would still use it.
This patch moves the allocation to setup stage and if failed error
message would be printed and caller would notice it.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
In postcopy-ram.c, we provide three functions to discard certain
RAMBlock range:
* postcopy_discard_send_init()
* postcopy_discard_send_range()
* postcopy_discard_send_finish()
Currently, we allocate/deallocate PostcopyDiscardState for each RAMBlock
on sending discard information to destination. This is not necessary and
the same data area could be reused for each RAMBlock.
This patch defines PostcopyDiscardState a static variable. By doing so:
1) avoid memory allocation and deallocation to the system
2) avoid potential failure of memory allocation
3) hide some details for their users
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Message-Id: <20190724010721.2146-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Not needed. Don't expose last_ram_page().
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20180620202736.21399-1-david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Wire up a call to VHOST_USER_POSTCOPY_END message to the vhost clients
right before we ask the listener thread to shutdown.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Add a hook to allow a client userfaultfd to be 'woken'
when a page arrives, and a walker that calls that
hook for relevant clients given a RAMBlock and offset.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Provide a helper to send a 'wake' request on a userfaultfd for
a shared process.
The address in the clients address space is specified together
with the RAMBlock it was resolved to.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Provide a helper to be used by shared waker functions to request
shared pages from the source.
The last_rb pointer is moved into the incoming state since this
helper can update it as well as the main fault thread function.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Notify the vhost-user slave on reception of the 'postcopy-listen'
event from the source.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Allow other userfaultfd's to be registered into the fault thread
so that handlers for shared memory can get responses.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Wire up a notifier to send a VHOST_USER_POSTCOPY_ADVISE
message on an incoming advise.
Later patches will fill in the behaviour/contents of the
message.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Add a notifier chain for postcopy with a 'reason' flag
and an opportunity for a notifier member to return an error.
Call it when enabling postcopy.
This will initially used to enable devices to declare they're unable
to postcopy and later to notify of devices of stages within postcopy.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
A general helper to notify the fault thread.
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20180208103132.28452-4-peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Need to mark copied pages as closer as possible to the place where it
tracks down. That will be necessary in futher patch.
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Perevalov <a.perevalov@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
That tiny refactoring is necessary to be able to set
UFFD_FEATURE_THREAD_ID while requesting features, and then
to create downtime context in case when kernel supports it.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Perevalov <a.perevalov@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Yes, we don't have a good place to put that stuff.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
It is internal to migration, not intended for other users.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
