We would like to use a same QObject type to represent numbers, whether
they are int, uint, or floats. Getters will allow some compatibility
between the various types if the number fits other representations.
Add a few more tests while at it.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20170607163635.17635-7-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
[parse_stats_intervals() simplified a bit, comment in
test_visitor_in_int_overflow() tidied up, suppress bogus warnings]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Rather than making lots of callers wrap a scalar in a QInt, QString,
or QBool, provide helper macros that do the wrapping automatically.
Update the Coccinelle script to make mass conversions easy, although
the conversion itself will be done as a separate patches to ease
review and backport efforts.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20170427215821.19397-6-eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
We have macros in place to make it less verbose to add a subtype
of QObject to both QDict and QList. While we have made cleanups
like this in the past (see commit fcfcd8ffc, for example), having
it be automated by Coccinelle makes it easier to maintain.
The script is separate from the cleanups, for ease of review and
backporting. A later patch will then add further possible cleanups.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20170427215821.19397-4-eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
