When dumping an object into the log, there are differences between
Python 2 and 3. First, unicode strings are prefixed by 'u' in Python 2
(they are no longer in 3, because unicode strings are the default
there). Second, the order of keys in dicts may differ. Third,
especially long numbers are longs in Python 2 and thus get an 'L'
suffix, which does not happen in Python 3.
We can get around all of these differences by dumping objects (lists and
dicts) in a language-independent format, namely JSON. The JSON
generator even allows emitting dicts with their keys sorted
alphabetically.
This changes the output of all tests that use these logging functions
(dict keys are ordered now, strings in dicts are now enclosed in double
quotes instead of single quotes, the 'L' suffix of large integers is
dropped, and "true" and "false" are now in lower case).
The quote change necessitates a small change to a filter used in test
207.
Suggested-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20181022135307.14398-10-mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
219 has two issues that may lead to sporadic failure, both of which are
the result of issuing query-jobs too early after a job has been
modified. This can then lead to different results based on whether the
modification has taken effect already or not.
First, query-jobs is issued right after the job has been created.
Besides its current progress possibly being in any random state (which
has already been taken care of), its total progress too is basically
arbitrary, because the job may not yet have been able to determine it.
This patch addresses this by just filtering the total progress, like
what has been done for the current progress already. However, for more
clarity, the filtering is changed to replace the values by a string
'FILTERED' instead of deleting them.
Secondly, query-jobs is issued right after a job has been resumed. The
job may or may not yet have had the time to actually perform any I/O,
and thus its current progress may or may not have advanced. To make
sure it has indeed advanced (which is what the reference output already
assumes), keep querying it until it has.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20180606190628.8170-1-mreitz@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
