The previous code checks whether the highest 16 bits of virtual address
equal to that of CSR.DMW0-3. This is incorrect according to the spec,
and is corrected to compare only the highest four bits instead.
Signed-off-by: Jiajie Chen <c@jia.je>
Reviewed-by: Song Gao <gaosong@loongson.cn>
Message-Id: <20230614065556.2397513-1-c@jia.je>
Signed-off-by: Song Gao <gaosong@loongson.cn>
The 'hwaddr' type is defined in "exec/hwaddr.h" as:
hwaddr is the type of a physical address
(its size can be different from 'target_ulong').
All definitions use the 'HWADDR_' prefix, except TARGET_FMT_plx:
$ fgrep define include/exec/hwaddr.h
#define HWADDR_H
#define HWADDR_BITS 64
#define HWADDR_MAX UINT64_MAX
#define TARGET_FMT_plx "%016" PRIx64
^^^^^^
#define HWADDR_PRId PRId64
#define HWADDR_PRIi PRIi64
#define HWADDR_PRIo PRIo64
#define HWADDR_PRIu PRIu64
#define HWADDR_PRIx PRIx64
#define HWADDR_PRIX PRIX64
Since hwaddr's size can be *different* from target_ulong, it is
very confusing to read one of its format using the 'TARGET_FMT_'
prefix, normally used for the target_long / target_ulong types:
$ fgrep TARGET_FMT_ include/exec/cpu-defs.h
#define TARGET_FMT_lx "%08x"
#define TARGET_FMT_ld "%d"
#define TARGET_FMT_lu "%u"
#define TARGET_FMT_lx "%016" PRIx64
#define TARGET_FMT_ld "%" PRId64
#define TARGET_FMT_lu "%" PRIu64
Apparently this format was missed during commit a8170e5e97
("Rename target_phys_addr_t to hwaddr"), so complete it by
doing a bulk-rename with:
$ sed -i -e s/TARGET_FMT_plx/HWADDR_FMT_plx/g $(git grep -l TARGET_FMT_plx)
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20230110212947.34557-1-philmd@linaro.org>
[thuth: Fix some warnings from checkpatch.pl along the way]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Regarding the patchset v3 has been merged into main line, and not
approved, this patch updates to patchset v4.
Fixes: b4bda200 ("target/loongarch: Adjust the layout of hardware flags bit fields")
Link: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2022-11/msg00808.html
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rui Wang <wangrui@loongson.cn>
Message-Id: <20221107024526.702297-2-wangrui@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Song Gao <gaosong@loongson.cn>
When the address is invalid address, We should set exception_index
according to MMUAccessType, and EXCCODE_ADEF need't update badinstr.
Otherwise, The system enters an infinite loop. e.g:
run test.c on system mode
test.c:
#include<stdio.h>
void (*func)(int *);
int main()
{
int i = 8;
void *ptr = (void *)0x4000000000000000;
func = ptr;
func(&i);
return 0;
}
Signed-off-by: Song Gao <gaosong@loongson.cn>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20221101073210.3934280-2-gaosong@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Xiaojuan Yang <yangxiaojuan@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Song Gao <gaosong@loongson.cn>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220606124333.2060567-23-yangxiaojuan@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
