The ARM virt machine currently uses sysbus-fdt to create device tree
entries for dynamically created MMIO devices.
The RISC-V virt machine can also benefit from this, so move the code to
the core directory.
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220427234146.1130752-3-alistair.francis@opensource.wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
The Arm SMMUv3 includes an optional feature equivalent to the CPU
FEAT_BBM, which permits an OS to switch a range of memory between
"covered by a huge page" and "covered by a sequence of normal pages"
without having to engage in the traditional 'break-before-make'
dance. (This is particularly important for the SMMU, because devices
performing I/O through an SMMU are less likely to be able to cope with
the window in the sequence where an access results in a translation
fault.) The SMMU spec explicitly notes that one of the valid ways to
be a BBM level 2 compliant implementation is:
* if there are multiple entries in the TLB for an address,
choose one of them and use it, ignoring the others
Our SMMU TLB implementation (unlike our CPU TLB) does allow multiple
TLB entries for an address, because the translation table level is
part of the SMMUIOTLBKey, and so our IOTLB hashtable can include
entries for the same address where the leaf was at different levels
(i.e. both hugepage and normal page). Our TLB lookup implementation in
smmu_iotlb_lookup() will always find the entry with the lowest level
(i.e. it prefers the hugepage over the normal page) and ignore any
others. TLB invalidation correctly removes all TLB entries matching
the specified address or address range (unless the guest specifies the
leaf level explicitly, in which case it gets what it asked for). So we
can validly advertise support for BBML level 2.
Note that we still can't yet advertise ourselves as an SMMU v3.2,
because v3.2 requires support for the S2FWB feature, which we don't
yet implement.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20220426160422.2353158-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make the translation error message prettier by adding a missing space
before the parenthesis.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20220427111543.124620-2-jean-philippe@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The Record bit in the Context Descriptor tells the SMMU to report fault
events to the event queue. Since we don't cache the Record bit at the
moment, access faults from a cached Context Descriptor are never
reported. Store the Record bit in the cached SMMUTransCfg.
Fixes: 9bde7f0674 ("hw/arm/smmuv3: Implement translate callback")
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20220427111543.124620-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
It always calls the IOMMU MR translate() callback with flag=IOMMU_NONE in
memory_region_iommu_replay(). Currently, smmuv3_translate() return an
IOMMUTLBEntry with perm set to IOMMU_NONE even if the translation success,
whereas it is expected to return the actual permission set in the table
entry.
So pass the actual perm to returned IOMMUTLBEntry in the table entry.
Signed-off-by: Xiang Chen <chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Message-id: 1650094695-121918-1-git-send-email-chenxiang66@hisilicon.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Add support for the TCG GICv4 to the virt board. For the board,
the GICv4 is very similar to the GICv3, with the only difference
being the size of the redistributor frame. The changes here are thus:
* calculating virt_redist_capacity correctly for GICv4
* changing various places which were "if GICv3" to be "if not GICv2"
* the commandline option handling
Note that using GICv4 reduces the maximum possible number of CPUs on
the virt board from 512 to 317, because we can now only fit half as
many redistributors into the redistributor regions we have defined.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220408141550.1271295-42-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In several places in virt.c we calculate the number of redistributors that
fit in a region of our memory map, which is the size of the region
divided by the size of a single redistributor frame. For GICv4, the
redistributor frame is a different size from that for GICv3. Abstract
out the calculation of redistributor region capacity so that we have
one place we need to change to handle GICv4 rather than several.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220408141550.1271295-41-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Everywhere we need to check which GIC version we're using, we look at
vms->gic_version and use the VIRT_GIC_VERSION_* enum values, except
in create_gic(), which copies vms->gic_version into a local 'int'
variable and makes direct comparisons against values 2 and 3.
For consistency, change this function to check the GIC version
the same way we do elsewhere. This includes not implicitly relying
on the enumeration type values happening to match the integer
'revision' values the GIC device object wants.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220408141550.1271295-40-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Also fixes a GCC 12.0.1 false-positive:
../hw/arm/allwinner-a10.c: In function ‘aw_a10_realize’:
../hw/arm/allwinner-a10.c:135:35: error: ‘%d’ directive writing between 1 and 11 bytes into a region of size 8 [-Werror=format-overflow=]
135 | sprintf(bus, "usb-bus.%d", i);
| ^~
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220420132624.2439741-15-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Also fixes a GCC 12.0.1 false-positive:
../hw/arm/digic.c: In function ‘digic_init’:
../hw/arm/digic.c:45:54: error: ‘%d’ directive output may be truncated writing between 1 and 11 bytes into a region of size 5 [-Werror=format-truncation=]
45 | snprintf(name, DIGIC_TIMER_NAME_MLEN, "timer[%d]", i);
| ^~
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220420132624.2439741-14-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
This patch uses the defined fields to describe PWRON STRAPs for
better readability.
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Venture <venture@google.com>
Message-id: 20220411165842.3912945-3-wuhaotsh@google.com
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Zongyuan Li <zongyuan.li@smartx.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220324181557.203805-3-zongyuan.li@smartx.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Zongyuan Li <zongyuan.li@smartx.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220324181557.203805-2-zongyuan.li@smartx.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The only time we use the int_combiner_irq[] and ext_combiner_irq[]
arrays in the Exynos4210Irq struct is during realize of the SoC -- we
initialize them with the input IRQs of the combiner devices, and then
connect those to outputs of other devices in
exynos4210_init_board_irqs(). Now that the combiner objects are
easily accessible as s->int_combiner and s->ext_combiner we can make
the connections directly from one device to the other without going
via these arrays.
Since these are the only two remaining elements of Exynos4210Irq,
we can remove that struct entirely.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-19-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Switch the creation of the combiner devices to the new-style
"embedded in state struct" approach, so we can easily refer
to the object elsewhere during realize.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-18-peter.maydell@linaro.org
At this point, the function exynos4210_init_board_irqs() splits input
IRQ lines to connect them to the input combiner, output combiner and
external GIC. The function exynos4210_combiner_get_gpioin() splits
some of the combiner input lines further to connect them to multiple
different inputs on the combiner.
Because (unlike qemu_irq_split()) the TYPE_SPLIT_IRQ device has a
configurable number of outputs, we can do all this in one place, by
making exynos4210_init_board_irqs() add extra outputs to the splitter
device when it must be connected to more than one input on each
combiner.
We do this with a new data structure, the combinermap, which is an
array each of whose elements is a list of the interrupt IDs on the
combiner which must be tied together. As we loop through each
interrupt ID, if we find that it is the first one in one of these
lists, we configure the splitter device with eonugh extra outputs and
wire them up to the other interrupt IDs in the list.
Conveniently, for all the cases where this is necessary, the
lowest-numbered interrupt ID in each group is in the range of the
external combiner, so we only need to code for this in the first of
the two loops in exynos4210_init_board_irqs().
The old code in exynos4210_combiner_get_gpioin() which is being
deleted here had several problems which don't exist in the new code
in its handling of the multi-core timer interrupts:
(1) the case labels specified bits 4 ... 8, but bit '8' doesn't
exist; these should have been 4 ... 7
(2) it used the input irq[EXYNOS4210_COMBINER_GET_IRQ_NUM(1, bit + 4)]
multiple times as the input of several different splitters,
which isn't allowed
(3) in an apparent cut-and-paste error, the cases for all the
multi-core timer inputs used "bit + 4" even though the
bit range for the case was (intended to be) 4 ... 7, which
meant it was looking at non-existent bits 8 ... 11.
None of these exist in the new code.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-17-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The combiner_grp_to_gic_id[] array includes the EXT_GIC_ID_MCT_G0
and EXT_GIC_ID_MCT_G1 multiple times. This means that we will
connect multiple IRQs up to the same external GIC input, which
is not permitted. We do the same thing in the code in
exynos4210_init_board_irqs() because the conditionals selecting
an irq_id in the first loop match multiple interrupt IDs.
Overall we do this for interrupt IDs
(1, 4), (12, 4), (35, 4), (51, 4), (53, 4) for EXT_GIC_ID_MCT_G0
and
(1, 5), (12, 5), (35, 5), (51, 5), (53, 5) for EXT_GIC_ID_MCT_G1
These correspond to the cases for the multi-core timer that we are
wiring up to multiple inputs on the combiner in
exynos4210_combiner_get_gpioin(). That code already deals with all
these interrupt IDs being the same input source, so we don't need to
connect the external GIC interrupt for any of them except the first
(1, 4) and (1, 5). Remove the array entries and conditionals which
were incorrectly causing us to wire up extra lines.
This bug didn't cause any visible effects, because we only connect
up a device to the "primary" ID values (1, 4) and (1, 5), so the
extra lines would never be set to a level.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-16-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Currently for the interrupts MCT_G0 and MCT_G1 which are
the only ones in the input range of the external combiner
and which are also wired to the external GIC, we connect
them only to the internal combiner and the external GIC.
This seems likely to be a bug, as all other interrupts
which are in the input range of both combiners are
connected to both combiners. (The fact that the code in
exynos4210_combiner_get_gpioin() is also trying to wire
up these inputs on both combiners also suggests this.)
Wire these interrupts up to both combiners, like the rest.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-15-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In exynos4210_init_board_irqs(), the loop that handles IRQ lines that
are in a range that applies to the internal combiner only creates a
splitter for those interrupts which go to both the internal combiner
and to the external GIC, but it does nothing at all for the
interrupts which don't go to the external GIC, leaving the
irq_table[] array element empty for those. (This will result in
those interrupts simply being lost, not in a QEMU crash.)
I don't have a reliable datasheet for this SoC, but since we do wire
up one interrupt line in this category (the HDMI I2C device on
interrupt 16,1), this seems like it must be a bug in the existing
QEMU code. Fill in the irq_table[] entries where we're not splitting
the IRQ to both the internal combiner and the external GIC with the
IRQ line of the internal combiner. (That is, these IRQ lines go to
just one device, not multiple.)
This bug didn't have any visible guest effects because the only
implemented device that was affected was the HDMI I2C controller,
and we never connect any I2C devices to that bus.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-14-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In exynos4210_init_board_irqs(), use the TYPE_SPLIT_IRQ device
instead of qemu_irq_split().
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-13-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The function exynos4210_combiner_get_gpioin() currently lives in
exynos4210_combiner.c, but it isn't really part of the combiner
device itself -- it is a function that implements the wiring up of
some interrupt sources to multiple combiner inputs. Move it to live
with the other SoC-level code in exynos4210.c, along with a few
macros previously defined in exynos4210.h which are now used only
in exynos4210.c.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-11-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The only time we use the ext_gic_irq[] array in the Exynos4210Irq
struct is during realize of the SoC -- we initialize it with the
input IRQs of the external GIC device, and then connect those to
outputs of other devices further on in realize (including in the
exynos4210_init_board_irqs() function). Now that the ext_gic object
is easily accessible as s->ext_gic we can make the connections
directly from one device to the other without going via this array.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-10-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Switch the creation of the external GIC to the new-style "embedded in
state struct" approach, so we can easily refer to the object
elsewhere during realize.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-9-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The function exynos4210_init_board_irqs() currently lives in
exynos4210_gic.c, but it isn't really part of the exynos4210.gic
device -- it is a function that implements (some of) the wiring up of
interrupts between the SoC's GIC and combiner components. This means
it fits better in exynos4210.c, which is the SoC-level code. Move it
there. Similarly, exynos4210_git_irq() is used almost only in the
SoC-level code, so move it too.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-8-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The exynos4210 code currently has two very similar arrays of IRQs:
* board_irqs is a field of the Exynos4210Irq struct which is filled
in by exynos4210_init_board_irqs() with the appropriate qemu_irqs
for each IRQ the board/SoC can assert
* irq_table is a set of qemu_irqs pointed to from the
Exynos4210State struct. It's allocated in exynos4210_init_irq,
and the only behaviour these irqs have is that they pass on the
level to the equivalent board_irqs[] irq
The extra indirection through irq_table is unnecessary, so coalesce
these into a single irq_table[] array as a direct field in
Exynos4210State which exynos4210_init_board_irqs() fills in.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-6-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The only time we use the int_gic_irq[] array in the Exynos4210Irq
struct is in the exynos4210_realize() function: we initialize it with
the GPIO inputs of the a9mpcore device, and then a bit later on we
connect those to the outputs of the internal combiner. Now that the
a9mpcore object is easily accessible as s->a9mpcore we can make the
connection directly from one device to the other without going via
this array.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-5-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The exynos4210 SoC mostly creates its child devices as if it were
board code. This includes the a9mpcore object. Switch that to a
new-style "embedded in the state struct" creation, because in the
next commit we're going to want to refer to the object again further
down in the exynos4210_realize() function.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The Exynos4210 SoC device currently uses a custom device
"exynos4210.irq_gate" to model the OR gate that feeds each CPU's IRQ
line. We have a standard TYPE_OR_IRQ device for this now, so use
that instead.
(This is a migration compatibility break, but that is OK for this
machine type.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-2-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Connect the CRL (Clock Reset LPD) to the Versal SoC.
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Konrad <fkonrad@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Francisco Iglesias <francisco.iglesias@amd.com>
Message-id: 20220406174303.2022038-5-edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Add the Cortex-R5Fs of the Versal RPU (Real-time Processing Unit)
subsystem.
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Francisco Iglesias <francisco.iglesias@amd.com>
Message-id: 20220406174303.2022038-3-edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Create an APU CPU Cluster. This is in preparation to add the RPU.
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Francisco Iglesias <francisco.iglesias@amd.com>
Message-id: 20220406174303.2022038-2-edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Connect the 4 TTC timers on the ZynqMP.
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Luc Michel <luc@lmichel.fr>
Reviewed-by: Francisco Iglesias <frasse.iglesias@gmail.com>
Message-id: 20220331222017.2914409-3-edgar.iglesias@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
It's not possible to provide the guest with the Security extensions
(TrustZone) when using KVM or HVF, because the hardware
virtualization extensions don't permit running EL3 guest code.
However, we weren't checking for this combination, with the result
that QEMU would assert if you tried it:
$ qemu-system-aarch64 -enable-kvm -machine virt,secure=on -cpu host -display none
Unexpected error in object_property_find_err() at ../../qom/object.c:1304:
qemu-system-aarch64: Property 'host-arm-cpu.secure-memory' not found
Aborted
Check for this combination of options and report an error, in the
same way we already do for attempts to give a KVM or HVF guest the
Virtualization or MTE extensions. Now we will report:
qemu-system-aarch64: mach-virt: KVM does not support providing Security extensions (TrustZone) to the guest CPU
Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/961
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404155301.566542-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Convert the TARGET_WORDS_BIGENDIAN macro, similarly to what was done
with HOST_BIG_ENDIAN. The new TARGET_BIG_ENDIAN macro is either 0 or 1,
and thus should always be defined to prevent misuse.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220323155743.1585078-8-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Connect the ZynqMP APU Control device.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Francisco Iglesias <francisco.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Reviewed-by: Luc Michel <luc@lmichel.fr>
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Message-id: 20220316164645.2303510-7-edgar.iglesias@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Connect the ZynqMP CRF - Clock Reset FPD device.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Francisco Iglesias <francisco.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Reviewed-by: Luc Michel <luc@lmichel.fr>
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Message-id: 20220316164645.2303510-5-edgar.iglesias@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Add an unimplemented SERDES (Serializer/Deserializer) area.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Francisco Iglesias <francisco.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Message-id: 20220316164645.2303510-2-edgar.iglesias@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
In TCG mode, if gic-version=max we always select GICv3 even if
CONFIG_ARM_GICV3_TCG is unset. We shall rather select GICv2.
This also brings the benefit of fixing qos tests errors for tests
using gic-version=max with CONFIG_ARM_GICV3_TCG unset.
Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20220308182452.223473-3-eric.auger@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
* Fix for a potential memory leak
* Aspeed SMC cleanups on the definition of the number of flash devices
* New bletchley-bmc machine, AST2600 based
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=5VHm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/legoater/tags/pull-aspeed-20220308' into staging
aspeed queue:
* Fix for a potential memory leak
* Aspeed SMC cleanups on the definition of the number of flash devices
* New bletchley-bmc machine, AST2600 based
# gpg: Signature made Tue 08 Mar 2022 08:19:25 GMT
# gpg: using RSA key A0F66548F04895EBFE6B0B6051A343C7CFFBECA1
# gpg: Good signature from "Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>" [undefined]
# gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
# gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
# Primary key fingerprint: A0F6 6548 F048 95EB FE6B 0B60 51A3 43C7 CFFB ECA1
* remotes/legoater/tags/pull-aspeed-20220308:
hw: aspeed_gpio: Cleanup stray semicolon after switch
hw/arm/aspeed: add Bletchley machine type
hw/arm/aspeed: allow missing spi_model
hw/block: m25p80: Add support for w25q01jvq
aspeed/smc: Fix error log
aspeed/smc: Let the SSI core layer define the bus name
aspeed/smc: Rename 'max_peripherals' to 'cs_num_max'
aspeed/smc: Remove 'num_cs' field
aspeed: Rework aspeed_board_init_flashes() interface
aspeed/smc: Use max number of CE instead of 'num_cs'
aspeed: Fix a potential memory leak bug in write_boot_rom()
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Add the 'bletchley-bmc' machine type based on the kernel DTS[1] and
hardware schematics available to me. The i2c model is as complete as
the current QEMU models support, but in some cases I substituted devices
that are close enough for present functionality. Strap registers are
kept the same as the AST2600-EVB until I'm able to confirm correct
values with physical hardware.
This has been tested with an openbmc image built from [2] plus a kernel
patch[3] for the SPI flash module.
1. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-facebook-bletchley.dts?id=a8c729e966c4e9d033242d948b0e53c2a62d32e2
2. b9432b980d
3. 25b566b9a9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Williams <patrick@stwcx.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
[ clg : increased number of FMC devices to 2 to match Linux dts ]
Message-Id: <20220305000656.1944589-2-patrick@stwcx.xyz>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Generally all BMCs will use the fmc_model to hold their own flash
and most will have a spi_model to hold the managed system's flash,
but not all systems do. Add a simple NULL check to allow a system
to set the spi_model as NULL to indicate it should not be instantiated.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Williams <patrick@stwcx.xyz>
Message-Id: <20220305000656.1944589-1-patrick@stwcx.xyz>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
It is not used anymore.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20220307071856.1410731-4-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Currently, the allocation of the flash devices uses the number of
slave selects configured in the SoC realize routine. It is simpler to
use directly the number of FMC devices defined in the machine class
and 1 for spi devices (which is what the SoC does in the back of the
machine).
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20220307071856.1410731-3-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
A memory chunk is allocated with g_new0() and assigned to the variable
'storage'. However, if the branch takes true, there will be only an
error report but not a free operation for 'storage' before function
returns. As a result, a memory leak bug is triggered.
Use g_autofree to fix the issue.
Suggested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Wentao_Liang <Wentao_Liang_g@163.com>
[ clg: reworked the commit log ]
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There is a Linux kernel bug present until v5.12 that prevents
booting with FEAT_LPA2 enabled. As a workaround for TCG,
disable this feature for machine versions prior to 7.0.
Cc: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
When we're using KVM, the PSCI implementation is provided by the
kernel, but QEMU has to tell the guest about it via the device tree.
Currently we look at the KVM_CAP_ARM_PSCI_0_2 capability to determine
if the kernel is providing at least PSCI 0.2, but if the kernel
provides a newer version than that we will still only tell the guest
it has PSCI 0.2. (This is fairly harmless; it just means the guest
won't use newer parts of the PSCI API.)
The kernel exposes the specific PSCI version it is implementing via
the ONE_REG API; use this to report in the dtb that the PSCI
implementation is 1.0-compatible if appropriate. (The device tree
binding currently only distinguishes "pre-0.2", "0.2-compatible" and
"1.0-compatible".)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20220224134655.1207865-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org
