The Avocado test runner attemps to find its INSTRUMENTED (that is,
Python based tests) in a manner that is as safe as possible to the
user. Different from plain Python unittest, it won't load or
execute test code on an operation such as:
$ avocado list tests/acceptance/
Before version 68.0, the logic implemented to identify INSTRUMENTED
tests would require either the "🥑 enable" or "🥑
recursive" statement as a flag for tests that would not inherit
directly from "avocado.Test". This is not necessary anymore,
and because of that the boiler plate statements can now be removed.
Reference: https://avocado-framework.readthedocs.io/en/68.0/release_notes/68_0.html#users-test-writers
Signed-off-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Caio Carrara <ccarrara@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Wainer dos Santos Moschetta <wainersm@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190218173723.26120-1-crosa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
This test boots a Linux kernel, and checks that the given command
line was effective in two ways:
* It makes the kernel use the set "console device" as a console
* The kernel records the command line as expected in the console
Given that way too many error conditions may occur, and detecting the
kernel boot progress status may not be trivial, this test relies on a
timeout to handle unexpected situations. Also, it's *not* tagged as a
quick test for obvious reasons.
It may be useful, while interactively running/debugging this test, or
tests similar to this one, to show some of the logging channels.
Example:
$ avocado --show=QMP,console run boot_linux_console.py
Signed-off-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20180530184156.15634-6-crosa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
