msr_me macro hides the usage of env->msr, which is a bad behavior
Substitute it with FIELD_EX64 calls that explicitly use env->msr
as a parameter.
Suggested-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Víctor Colombo <victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220504210541.115256-11-victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
msr_pow macro hides the usage of env->msr, which is a bad behavior
Substitute it with FIELD_EX64 calls that explicitly use env->msr
as a parameter.
Suggested-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Víctor Colombo <victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220504210541.115256-10-victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
msr_ce macro hides the usage of env->msr, which is a bad behavior
Substitute it with FIELD_EX64 calls that explicitly use env->msr
as a parameter.
Suggested-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Víctor Colombo <victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220504210541.115256-9-victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
msr_ee macro hides the usage of env->msr, which is a bad behavior
Substitute it with FIELD_EX64 calls that explicitly use env->msr
as a parameter.
Suggested-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Víctor Colombo <victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220504210541.115256-8-victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
msr_pr macro hides the usage of env->msr, which is a bad behavior
Substitute it with FIELD_EX64 calls that explicitly use env->msr
as a parameter.
Suggested-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Víctor Colombo <victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220504210541.115256-4-victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
This patch adds the EBB exception support that are triggered by
Performance Monitor alerts. This happens when a Performance Monitor
alert occurs and MMCR0_EBE, BESCR_PME and BESCR_GE are set.
fire_PMC_interrupt() will execute the raise_ebb_perfm_exception() helper
which will check for MMCR0_EBE, BESCR_PME and BESCR_GE bits. If all bits
are set, do_ebb() will attempt to trigger a PERFM EBB event.
If the EBB facility is enabled in both FSCR and HFSCR we consider that
the EBB is valid and set BESCR_PMEO. After that, if we're running in
problem state, fire a POWERPC_EXCP_PERM_EBB immediately. Otherwise we'll
queue a PPC_INTERRUPT_EBB.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220225101140.1054160-5-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
PPC_INTERRUPT_EBB is a new interrupt that will be used to deliver EBB
exceptions that had to be postponed because the thread wasn't in problem
state at the time the event-based branch was supposed to occur.
ISA 3.1 also defines two EBB exceptions: Performance Monitor EBB
exception and External EBB exception. They are being added as
POWERPC_EXCP_PERFM_EBB and POWERPC_EXCP_EXTERNAL_EBB.
PPC_INTERRUPT_EBB will check BESCR bits to see the EBB type that
occurred and trigger the appropriate exception. Both exceptions are
doing the same thing in this first implementation: clear BESCR_GE and
enter the branch with env->nip retrieved from SPR_EBBHR.
The checks being done by the interrupt code are msr_pr and BESCR_GE
states. All other checks (EBB facility check, BESCR_PME bit, specific
bits related to the event type) must be done beforehand.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220225101140.1054160-4-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Many files use "qemu/log.h" declarations but neglect to include
it (they inherit it via "exec/exec-all.h"). "exec/exec-all.h" is
a core component and shouldn't be used that way. Move the
"qemu/log.h" inclusion locally to each unit requiring it.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220207082756.82600-10-f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Introduce virtual hypervisor methods that can support a "Nested KVM HV"
implementation using the bare metal 2-level radix MMU, and using HV
exceptions to return from H_ENTER_NESTED (rather than cause interrupts).
HV exceptions can now be raised in the TCG spapr machine when running a
nested KVM HV guest. The main ones are the lev==1 syscall, the hdecr,
hdsi and hisi, hv fu, and hv emu, and h_virt external interrupts.
HV exceptions are intercepted in the exception handler code and instead
of causing interrupts in the guest and switching the machine to HV mode,
they go to the vhyp where it may exit the H_ENTER_NESTED hcall with the
interrupt vector numer as return value as required by the hcall API.
Address translation is provided by the 2-level page table walker that is
implemented for the bare metal radix MMU. The partition scope page table
is pointed to the L1's partition scope by the get_pate vhc method.
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220216102545.1808018-9-npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This moves the logic to reset the QEMU exception state into its own
function.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
[ clg: checkpatch fixes ]
Message-Id: <20220216102545.1808018-8-npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The virtual hypervisor currently always intercepts and handles
hypercalls but with a future change this will not always be the case.
Add a helper for the test so the logic is abstracted from the mechanism.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220216102545.1808018-7-npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
We don't really need to check for exception model while applying
AIL. We can check the lpcr_mask for the presence of
LPCR_AIL/LPCR_HAIL.
This removes one more instance of passing the exception model ID
around.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220207183036.1507882-5-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
We currently abort QEMU during the dispatch of an interrupt if we try
to set MSR_HV without having MSR_HVB in the msr_mask. I think we
should verify this for all MSR bits. There is no reason to ever have a
MSR bit set if the corresponding bit is not set in that CPU's
msr_mask.
Note that this is not about the emulated code setting reserved
bits. We clear the new_msr when starting to dispatch an exception, so
if we end up with bits not present in the msr_mask that is a QEMU
programming error.
I kept the HSRR verification for BookS because it is the only CPU
family that has HSRRs.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220207183036.1507882-4-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Make the cpu-specific powerpc_excp_* functions a bit simpler by moving
the bounds check and logging to powerpc_excp.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220207183036.1507882-3-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Now that all CPU families have their own separate exception
dispatching code we can remove powerpc_excp_legacy.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220207183036.1507882-2-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The 7xx CPUs don't have alternate/hypervisor Save and Restore
Registers, so we can set SRR0 and SRR1 directly.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-11-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This code applies only to the 7xx CPUs, so we can remove the switch
statement.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-10-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Thre is no HV support in the 7xx.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-9-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Remove the BookE code and add a comment explaining why we need to keep
hypercall support even though this CPU does not have a hypervisor
mode.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-8-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There's no ESR in the 7xx.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-7-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There is no MSR_HV in the 7xx so remove the LPES0 handling.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-6-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There's no MSR_HV in the 7xx.
Also remove 40x and BookE code.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-5-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Differences from the generic powerpc_excp code:
- Not BookE, so some MSR bits are cleared at interrupt dispatch;
- No MSR_HV;
- No power saving states;
- No Hypervisor Emulation Assistance;
- Not 64 bits;
- No System call vectored;
- No Alternate Interrupt Location.
Exceptions used:
POWERPC_EXCP_ALIGN
POWERPC_EXCP_DECR
POWERPC_EXCP_DLTLB
POWERPC_EXCP_DSI
POWERPC_EXCP_DSTLB
POWERPC_EXCP_EXTERNAL
POWERPC_EXCP_FPU
POWERPC_EXCP_IABR
POWERPC_EXCP_IFTLB
POWERPC_EXCP_ISI
POWERPC_EXCP_MCHECK
POWERPC_EXCP_PERFM
POWERPC_EXCP_PROGRAM
POWERPC_EXCP_RESET
POWERPC_EXCP_SMI
POWERPC_EXCP_SYSCALL
POWERPC_EXCP_THERM
POWERPC_EXCP_TRACE
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-4-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Introduce a new powerpc_excp function specific for PowerPC 7xx CPUs
(740, 745, 750, 750cl, 750cx, 750fx, 750gx, 755). This commit copies
powerpc_excp_legacy verbatim so the next one has a clean diff.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-3-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Since we've split the exception code by exception model, the exception
model IDs are becoming less useful. These two can be merged.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-2-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The 6xx CPUs don't have alternate/hypervisor Save and Restore
Registers, so we can set SRR0 and SRR1 directly.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220203200957.1434641-12-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This code applies only to the 6xx CPUs, so we can remove the switch
statement.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220203200957.1434641-11-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There is no HV support in the 6xx.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220203200957.1434641-10-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There is no Hypervisor mode in the 6xx CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220203200957.1434641-9-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There's no ESR in the 6xx CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220203200957.1434641-8-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There's no Hypervisor mode in the 6xx, so remove all LPES0 logic.
Also remove BookE IRQ code.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220203200957.1434641-7-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There's no MSR_HV in the 6xx CPUs.
Also remove the 40x and BookE code.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220203200957.1434641-6-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This only applies to the G2s, the other 6xx CPUs will not have this
vector registered.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220203200957.1434641-5-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Introduce a new powerpc_excp function specific for PowerPC 6xx CPUs
(603, 604, G2, MPC5xx, MCP8xx). This commit copies powerpc_excp_legacy
verbatim so the next one has a clean diff.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220203200957.1434641-3-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
We don't need three separate exception model IDs for the 603, 604 and
G2.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220203200957.1434641-2-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The PowerPC 601 processor is the first generation of processors to
implement the PowerPC architecture. It was designed as a bridge
processor and also could execute most of the instructions of the
previous POWER architecture. It was found on the first Macs and IBM
RS/6000 workstations.
There is not much interest in keeping the CPU model of this
POWER-PowerPC bridge processor. We have the 603 and 604 CPU models of
the 60x family which implement the complete PowerPC instruction set.
Cc: "Hervé Poussineau" <hpoussin@reactos.org>
Cc: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220203142756.1302515-1-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There is no MSR_HV in BookE, so remove all of the HV logic.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220128224018.1228062-12-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Remove the switch as this function applies to BookE only.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220128224018.1228062-11-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
QEMU does not support BookE as a hypervisor.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220128224018.1228062-10-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
BookE has no DSISR or DAR. The proper registers ESR and DEAR were
already set at this point.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220128224018.1228062-9-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There is no LPES0 in BookE and no MSR_HV.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220128224018.1228062-8-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The SRR1 should be set to the MSR value. There are no diagnostic bits
in the SRR1 for BookE.
Note that this fixes a bug where MSR_GS would be set and Linux would
go into KVM code when there's no KVM guest.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220128224018.1228062-7-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There is no DSISR or DAR in BookE. Change to ESR and DEAR.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220128224018.1228062-6-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There's no MSR_HV in BookE.
Also remove 40x code.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220128224018.1228062-5-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Introduce a new powerpc_excp function specific for BookE CPUs. This
commit copies powerpc_excp_legacy verbatim so the next one has a clean
diff.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220128224018.1228062-2-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The 602 was derived from the PowerPC 603, for the gaming market it
seems. It was hardly used and no firmware supporting the CPU could be
found. Drop support.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The 74xx does not have alternate/hypervisor Save and Restore
Registers, so we can set SRR0 and SRR1 directly.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220127201116.1154733-9-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
