Our copy of the nwfpe code for emulating of the old FPA11 floating
point unit doesn't check the coprocessor number in the instruction
when it emulates it. This means that we might treat some
instructions which should really UNDEF as being FPA11 instructions by
accident.
The kernel's copy of the nwfpe code doesn't make this error; I suspect
the bug was noticed and fixed as part of the process of mainlining
the nwfpe code more than a decade ago.
Add a check that the coprocessor number (which is always in bits
[11:8] of the instruction) is either 1 or 2, which is where the
FPA11 lives.
Reported-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Clean up includes so that osdep.h is included first and headers
which it implies are not included manually.
This commit was created with scripts/clean-includes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1453832250-766-10-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The REG_PC constant used in the ARM nwfpe code is fine in the kernel
but when used in qemu can clash with a definition in the host system
include files (in particular on Ubuntu Lucid SPARC, including signal.h
will define a REG_PC). Rename the constant to avoid this issue.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Looks like linux-user code was correct, just unreadable: what it wanted
to do with "-=" was really assign a negative number, not decrement. Fix
up accordingly.
Reported-by: Laurent Desnogues <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Modern compilers do not parse "=-" as decrement:
you must use "-=" for that.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
