Remove panic-on-error from virtio-scsi IPL specific functions so that error
recovery may be possible in the future.
Functions that would previously panic now provide a return code.
Signed-off-by: Jared Rossi <jrossi@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20241020012953.1380075-10-jrossi@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
We are already using the libc from SLOF for the s390-netboot.img, and
this libc implementation is way more complete and accurate than the
simple implementation that we currently use for the s390-ccw.img binary.
Since we are now always assuming that the SLOF submodule is available
when building the s390-ccw bios (see commit bf6903f694), we can drop
the simple implementation and use the SLOF libc for the s390-ccw.img
binary, too.
Additionally replace sclp_print calls with puts/printf now that it is
available.
Co-authored by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jared Rossi <jrossi@linux.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <20241020012953.1380075-3-jrossi@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Any good reason why this still exist?
I can understand u* and __u* to be linux kernel like, but ulong?
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230629104821.194859-2-thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220707163720.1421716-5-berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
The next patch is going to add more virtio-block specific code to
virtio_blk_setup_device(), and if the virtio-scsi code is also in
there, this is more cumbersome. And the calling function virtio_setup()
in main.c looks at the device type already anyway, so it's more
logical to separate the virtio-scsi stuff into a new function in
virtio-scsi.c instead.
Message-Id: <20220704111903.62400-10-thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
In case the user did not specify a boot device, we want to continue
looking for other devices if there are no valid SCSI disks on a virtio-
scsi controller. As a first step, do not panic in this case and let
the control flow carry the error to the upper functions instead.
Message-Id: <20200806105349.632-6-thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
They are definitely helper functions.
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200624075226.92728-4-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Let's consolidate timing related functions into one header.
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200624075226.92728-3-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
When rebooting a guest that has a virtio-scsi disk, the s390-ccw
bios sometimes bails out with an error message like this:
! SCSI cannot report LUNs: STATUS=02 RSPN=70 KEY=05 CODE=25 QLFR=00, sure !
Enabling the scsi_req* tracing in QEMU shows that the ccw bios is
trying to execute the REPORT LUNS SCSI command with a LUN != 0, and
this causes the SCSI command to fail.
Looks like we neither clear the BSS of the s390-ccw bios during reboot,
nor do we explicitly set the default_scsi_device.lun value to 0, so
this variable can contain random values from the OS after the reboot.
By setting this variable explicitly to 0, the problem is fixed and
the reboots always succeed.
Buglink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514352
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1510942228-22822-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
The upcoming netboot code will use the libc from SLOF. To be able
to still use s390-ccw.h there, the libc related functions in this
header have to be moved to a different location.
And while we're at it, remove the duplicate memcpy() function from
sclp.c.
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1499863793-18627-2-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Now that we've read all the possible limits that have been defined for
a virtio-scsi controller and the disk we're booting from, it's possible
that we are STILL going to exceed the limits of the host device.
For example, a "-device scsi-generic" device does not support the
Block Limits VPD page.
So, let's fallback to something that seems to work for most boot
configurations if larger values were specified (including if nothing
was explicitly specified, and we took default values).
Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20170510155359.32727-8-farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
The "Block Limits" Inquiry VPD page is optional for any SCSI device,
but if it's supported it provides a hint of the maximum I/O transfer
length for this particular device. If this page is supported by the
disk, let's issue that Inquiry and use the minimum of it and the
SCSI controller limit. That will cover this scenario:
qemu-system-s390x ...
-device virtio-scsi-ccw,id=scsi0,max_sectors=32768 ...
-drive file=/dev/sda,if=none,id=drive0,format=raw ...
-device scsi-hd,bus=scsi0.0,channel=0,scsi-id=0,
drive=drive0,id=disk0,max_io_size=1048576
controller: 32768 sectors x 512 bytes/sector = 16777216 bytes
disk: 1048576 bytes
Now that we have a limit for a virtio-scsi disk, compare that with the
limit for the virtio-scsi controller when we actually build the I/O.
The minimum of these two limits should be the one we use.
Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20170510155359.32727-7-farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
The "Supported Pages" Inquiry EVPD page is mandatory for all SCSI devices,
and is used as a gateway for what VPD pages the device actually supports.
Let's issue this Inquiry, and dump that list with the debug facility.
Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20170510155359.32727-6-farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
If we want to issue any of the SCSI Inquiry EVPD pages,
which we do, we could use this function to issue both types
of commands with a little bit of refactoring.
Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20170510155359.32727-5-farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
A virtio-scsi request that goes through the host sd driver and exceeds
the maximum transfer size is automatically broken up for us. But the
equivalent request going to the sg driver presumes that any length
requirements have already been honored.
Let's use the max_sectors field on the virtio-scsi controller device,
and break up all requests (both sd and sg) to avoid this problem.
Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20170510155359.32727-4-farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Simple refactoring so that the blk_factor adjustment is
moved into virtio_scsi_read_many routine, in preparation
for another change.
Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20170510155359.32727-3-farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
When using virtio-scsi, we multiply the READ(10) data_size by
a block factor twice when building the I/O. This is fine,
since it's only 1 for SCSI disks, but let's clean it up.
Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20170510155359.32727-2-farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
There is ,bootindex=%d argument to specify the lookup order of
boot devices.
If a bootindex assigned to the device, then IPL Parameter Info Block
is created for that device when it is IPLed from.
If it is a mere SCSI device (not FCP), then IPIB is created with a
special SCSI type and its fields are used to store SCSI address of the
device. This new ipl block is private to qemu for now.
If the device to IPL from is specified this way, then SCSI bus lookup
is bypassed and prescribed devices uses the address specified.
Signed-off-by: Eugene (jno) Dvurechenski <jno@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Yarygin <yarygin@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
