Use get_sysfs_str_val() to get the string value of device
zoned model. Then get_sysfs_zoned_model() can convert it to
BlockZoneModel type of QEMU.
Use get_sysfs_long_val() to get the long value of zoned device
information.
Signed-off-by: Sam Li <faithilikerun@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Fomichev <dmitry.fomichev@wdc.com>
Acked-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20230508045533.175575-3-faithilikerun@gmail.com
Message-id: 20230324090605.28361-3-faithilikerun@gmail.com
[Adjust commit message prefix as suggested by Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
<philmd@linaro.org>.
--Stefan]
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_refresh_limits() need to hold a reader lock for the graph because
it accesses the children list of a node.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230504115750.54437-21-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_recurse_can_replace() need to hold a reader lock for the graph
because it accesses the children list of a node.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230504115750.54437-20-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of amend
callbacks in BlockDriver need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230504115750.54437-17-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_debug_event() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
Unfortunately we cannot use a co_wrapper_bdrv_rdlock (i.e. make the
coroutine wrapper a no_coroutine_fn), because the function is called
(using the BLKDBG_EVENT macro) by mixed functions that run both in
coroutine and non-coroutine context (for example many of the functions
in qcow2-cluster.c and qcow2-refcount.c).
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230504115750.54437-16-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_get_info() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230504115750.54437-15-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_get_allocated_file_size() need to hold a reader lock for the
graph.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230504115750.54437-14-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Drivers were a bit confused about whether .bdrv_open can run in a
coroutine and whether or not it holds a graph lock.
It cannot keep a graph lock from the caller across the whole function
because it both changes the graph (requires a writer lock) and does I/O
(requires a reader lock). Therefore, it should take these locks
internally as needed.
The functions used to be called in coroutine context during image
creation. This was buggy for other reasons, and as of commit 32192301,
all block drivers go through no_co_wrappers. So it is not called in
coroutine context any more.
Fix qcow2 and qed to work with the correct assumptions: The graph lock
needs to be taken internally instead of just assuming it's already
there, and the coroutine path is dead code that can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230504115750.54437-9-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Fixup a few minor typos
Signed-off-by: Wilfred Mallawa <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20230313003744.55476-1-wilfred.mallawa@opensource.wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Fill in the field in BlockLimits directly for host devices, and
copy it from there for the raw format.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230407153303.391121-5-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
At the protocol level, has_variable_length only needs to be true in the
very special case of host CD-ROM drives, so that they do not need an
explicit monitor command to read the new size when a disc is loaded
in the tray.
However, at the format level has_variable_length has to be true for all
raw blockdevs and for all filters, even though in practice the length
depends on the underlying file and thus will not change except in the
case of host CD-ROM drives.
As a first step towards computing an accurate value of has_variable_length,
add the value into the BlockLimits structure and initialize the field
from the BlockDriver.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230407153303.391121-2-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_refresh_total_sectors() need to hold a reader lock for the
graph.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-24-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_*_dirty_bitmap() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-23-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_delete_file() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-22-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_register_buf() and bdrv_unregister_buf() need to hold a reader lock
for the graph.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-21-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_eject() and bdrv_co_lock_medium() need to hold a reader lock for
the graph.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-20-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_is_inserted() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
blk_is_inserted() is done as a co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_rdlock (unlike most
other blk_* functions) because it is called a lot from other blk_co_*()
functions that already hold the lock. These calls go through
blk_is_available(), which becomes a co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_rdlock, too,
for the same reason.
Functions that run in a coroutine and can call bdrv_co_is_available()
directly are changed to do so, which results in better TSA coverage.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-19-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_io_plug() and bdrv_co_io_unplug() need to hold a reader lock for
the graph.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-18-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_create() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-17-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-16-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_copy_range() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-15-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_driver_*() need to hold a reader lock for the graph. It doesn't add
the annotation to public functions yet.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-11-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-10-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_pdiscard() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-9-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_flush() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-8-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_ioctl() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-6-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_block_status() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-5-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_truncate() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-4-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Since these functions always run in coroutine context, adjust
their name to include "_co_", just like all other BlockDriver callbacks.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-15-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_debug_event() is categorized as an I/O function, and it currently
doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph rdlock since
it traverses the block nodes graph, which however is only possible in a
coroutine.
Therefore turn it into a co_wrapper_mixed to move the actual function
into a coroutine where the lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-14-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_lock_medium() is categorized as an I/O function, and it currently
doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph rdlock since
it traverses the block nodes graph, which however is only possible in a
coroutine.
The only caller of this function is blk_lock_medium(). Therefore make
blk_lock_medium() a co_wrapper, so that it always creates a new
coroutine, and then make bdrv_lock_medium() a coroutine_fn where the
lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-13-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_eject() is categorized as an I/O function, and it currently
doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph rdlock since
it traverses the block nodes graph, which however is only possible in a
coroutine.
The only caller of this function is blk_eject(). Therefore make
blk_eject() a co_wrapper, so that it always creates a new coroutine, and
then make bdrv_eject() coroutine_fn where the lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-12-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_get_info() is categorized as an I/O function, and it currently
doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph rdlock since
it traverses the block nodes graph, which however is only possible in a
coroutine.
Therefore turn it into a co_wrapper to move the actual function into a
coroutine where the lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-11-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_get_allocated_file_size() is categorized as an I/O function, and it
currently doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph
rdlock since it traverses the block nodes graph, which however is only
possible in a coroutine.
Therefore turn it into a co_wrapper to move the actual function into a
coroutine where the lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-10-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
BlockDriver->bdrv_getlength is categorized as IO callback, and it
currently doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph
rdlock since the callback traverses the block nodes graph, which however
is only possible in a coroutine.
Therefore turn it into a co_wrapper to move the actual function into a
coroutine where the lock can be taken.
Because now this function creates a new coroutine and polls, we need to
take the AioContext lock where it is missing, for the only reason that
internally co_wrapper calls AIO_WAIT_WHILE and it expects to release the
AioContext lock.
This is especially messy when a co_wrapper creates a coroutine and polls
in bdrv_open_driver, because this function has so many callers in so
many context that it can easily lead to deadlocks. Therefore the new
rule for bdrv_open_driver is that the caller must always hold the
AioContext lock of the given bs (except if it is a coroutine), because
the function calls bdrv_refresh_total_sectors() which is now a
co_wrapper.
Once the rwlock is ultimated and placed in every place it needs to be,
we will poll using AIO_WAIT_WHILE_UNLOCKED and remove the AioContext
lock.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-7-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_is_inserted() is categorized as an I/O function, and it currently
doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph rdlock since
it traverses the block nodes graph, which however is only possible in a
coroutine.
Therefore turn it into a co_wrapper to move the actual function into a
coroutine where the lock can be taken.
At the same time, add also blk_is_inserted as co_wrapper_mixed, since it
is called in both coroutine and non-coroutine contexts.
Because now this function creates a new coroutine and polls, we need to
take the AioContext lock where it is missing, for the only reason that
internally c_w_mixed_bdrv_rdlock calls AIO_WAIT_WHILE and it expects to
release the AioContext lock. Once the rwlock is ultimated and placed in
every place it needs to be, we will poll using AIO_WAIT_WHILE_UNLOCKED
and remove the AioContext lock.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-5-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
BlockDriver->bdrv_io_unplug is categorized as IO callback, and it
currently doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph
rdlock since the callback traverses the block nodes graph, which however
is only possible in a coroutine.
The only caller of this function is blk_io_unplug(), therefore make
blk_io_unplug() a co_wrapper, so that we're always running in a
coroutine where the lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-4-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
BlockDriver->bdrv_io_plug is categorized as IO callback, and it
currently doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph
rdlock since the callback traverses the block nodes graph, which however
is only possible in a coroutine.
The only caller of this function is blk_io_plug(), therefore make
blk_io_plug() a co_wrapper, so that we're always running in a coroutine
where the lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-3-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
We have two inclusion loops:
block/block.h
-> block/block-global-state.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h
block/block.h
-> block/block-io.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h
I believe these go back to Emanuele's reorganization of the block API,
merged a few months ago in commit d7e2fe4aac.
Fortunately, breaking them is merely a matter of deleting unnecessary
includes from headers, and adding them back in places where they are
now missing.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221221133551.3967339-2-armbru@redhat.com>
The generated coroutine wrappers already take care to take the lock in
the non-coroutine path, and assume that the lock is already taken in the
coroutine path.
The only thing we need to do for the wrapped function is adding the
GRAPH_RDLOCK annotation. Doing so also allows us to mark the
corresponding callbacks in BlockDriver as GRAPH_RDLOCK_PTR.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221207131838.239125-19-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221207131838.239125-16-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
We only need to call both the BlockDriver's callback and the parent
callbacks when going from undrained to drained or vice versa. A second
drain section doesn't make a difference for the driver or the parent,
they weren't supposed to send new requests before and after the second
drain.
One thing that gets in the way is the 'ignore_bds_parents' parameter in
bdrv_do_drained_begin_quiesce() and bdrv_do_drained_end(): It means that
bdrv_drain_all_begin() increases bs->quiesce_counter, but does not
quiesce the parent through BdrvChildClass callbacks. If an additional
drain section is started now, bs->quiesce_counter will be non-zero, but
we would still need to quiesce the parent through BdrvChildClass in
order to keep things consistent (and unquiesce it on the matching
bdrv_drained_end(), even though the counter would not reach 0 yet as
long as the bdrv_drain_all() section is still active).
Instead of keeping track of this, let's just get rid of the parameter.
It was introduced in commit 6cd5c9d7b2 as an optimisation so that
during bdrv_drain_all(), we wouldn't recursively drain all parents up to
the root for each node, resulting in quadratic complexity. As it happens,
calling the callbacks only once solves the same problem, so as of this
patch, we'll still have O(n) complexity and ignore_bds_parents is not
needed any more.
This patch only ignores the 'ignore_bds_parents' parameter. It will be
removed in a separate patch.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221118174110.55183-12-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Subtree drains are not used any more. Remove them.
After this, BdrvChildClass.attach/detach() don't poll any more.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221118174110.55183-11-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
drained_end_counter is unused now, nobody changes its value any more. It
can be removed.
In cases where we had two almost identical functions that only differed
in whether the caller passes drained_end_counter, or whether they would
poll for a local drained_end_counter to reach 0, these become a single
function.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221118174110.55183-5-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Polling during bdrv_drained_end() can be problematic (and in the future,
we may get cases for bdrv_drained_begin() where polling is forbidden,
and we don't care about already in-flight requests, but just want to
prevent new requests from arriving).
The .bdrv_drained_begin/end callbacks running in a coroutine is the only
reason why we have to do this polling, so make them non-coroutine
callbacks again. None of the callers actually yield any more.
This means that bdrv_drained_end() effectively doesn't poll any more,
even if AIO_WAIT_WHILE() loops are still there (their condition is false
from the beginning). This is generally not a problem, but in
test-bdrv-drain, some additional explicit aio_poll() calls need to be
added because the test case wants to verify the final state after BHs
have executed.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221118174110.55183-4-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
We want to use bdrv_child_get_parent_aio_context() from
bdrv_parent_drained_{begin,end}_single(), both of which are "I/O or GS"
functions.
Prior to 3ed4f708fe, all the implementations were I/O code anyway.
3ed4f708fe has put block jobs' AioContext field under the job mutex, so
to make child_job_get_parent_aio_context() work in an I/O context, we
need to take that lock there.
Furthermore, blk_root_get_parent_aio_context() is not marked as
anything, but is safe to run in an I/O context, so mark it that way now.
(blk_get_aio_context() is an I/O code function.)
With that done, all implementations explicitly are I/O code, so we can
mark bdrv_child_get_parent_aio_context() as I/O code, too, so callers
know it is safe to run from both GS and I/O contexts.
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221107151321.211175-2-hreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alberto Faria <afaria@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221013123711.620631-9-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Together with all _can_set_ and _set_ APIs, as they are not needed
anymore.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221025084952.2139888-9-eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Minor performance improvement, but given that we have hash tables
available, avoid iterating in the visited nodes list every time just
to check if a node has been already visited.
The data structure is not actually a proper hash map, but an hash set,
as we are just adding nodes and not key,value pairs.
Suggested-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221025084952.2139888-4-eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
