Coverity complains that we don't check for failures from dup()
and mkstemp(); add asserts that these syscalls succeeded.
Fixes: Coverity CID 1432516, 1432574
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20210525134458.6675-7-peter.maydell@linaro.org
This variable is just a cache for !(bs->open_flags & BDRV_O_RDWR),
which we have to synchronize everywhere. Let's just drop it and
consistently use bdrv_is_read_only().
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20210527154056.70294-3-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
The replication.h file is included from migration/colo.c and tests/unit/test-replication.c,
so it should be in include/.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
"qemu/typedefs.h" is enough for include/block/write-threshold.h header
with forward declaration of BlockDriverState. Also drop extra includes
from block/write-threshold.c and tests/unit/test-write-threshold.c
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20210506090621.11848-9-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
We don't need this extra logic: it doesn't make code simpler.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210506090621.11848-8-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Testing set/get of one 64bit variable doesn't seem necessary. We have a
lot of such variables. Also remaining tests do test set/get anyway.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210506090621.11848-7-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
bdrv_write_threshold_exceeded() is unused.
bdrv_write_threshold_is_set() is used only to double check the value of
bs->write_threshold_offset in tests. No real sense in it (both tests do
check real value with help of bdrv_write_threshold_get())
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210506090621.11848-5-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
[mreitz: Adjusted commit message as per Eric's suggestion]
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
These tests use bdrv_write_threshold_exceeded() API, which is used only
for test (since pre-previous commit). Better is testing real API, which
is used in block.c as well.
So, let's call bdrv_write_threshold_check_write(), and check is
bs->write_threshold_offset cleared or not (it's cleared iff threshold
triggered).
Also we get rid of BdrvTrackedRequest use here. Note, that paranoiac
bdrv_check_request() calls were added in 8b1170012b to protect
BdrvTrackedRequest. Drop them now.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210506090621.11848-4-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
bdrv_append is not very good for inserting filters: it does extra
permission update as part of bdrv_set_backing_hd(). During this update
filter may conflict with other parents of top_bs.
Instead, let's first do all graph modifications and after it update
permissions.
append-greedy-filter test-case in test-bdrv-graph-mod is now works, so
move it out of debug option.
Note: bdrv_append() is still only works for backing-child based
filters. It's something to improve later.
Note2: we use the fact that bdrv_append() is used to append new nodes,
without backing child, so we don't need frozen check and inherits_from
logic from bdrv_set_backing_hd().
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-22-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
inore_children thing doesn't help to track all propagated permissions
of children we want to ignore. The simplest way to correctly update
permissions is update graph first and then do permission update. In
this case we just referesh permissions for the whole subgraph (in
topological-sort defined order) and everything is correctly calculated
automatically without any ignore_children.
So, refactor bdrv_replace_node_common to first do graph update and then
refresh the permissions.
Test test_parallel_exclusive_write() now pass, so move it out of
debugging "if".
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-18-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Rewrite bdrv_check_perm(), bdrv_abort_perm_update() and bdrv_set_perm()
to update nodes in topological sort order instead of simple DFS. With
topologically sorted nodes, we update a node only when all its parents
already updated. With DFS it's not so.
Consider the following example:
A -+
| |
| v
| B
| |
v |
C<-+
A is parent for B and C, B is parent for C.
Obviously, to update permissions, we should go in order A B C, so, when
we update C, all parent permissions already updated. But with current
approach (simple recursion) we can update in sequence A C B C (C is
updated twice). On first update of C, we consider old B permissions, so
doing wrong thing. If it succeed, all is OK, on second C update we will
finish with correct graph. But if the wrong thing failed, we break the
whole process for no reason (it's possible that updated B permission
will be less strict, but we will never check it).
Also new approach gives a way to simultaneously and correctly update
several nodes, we just need to run bdrv_topological_dfs() several times
to add all nodes and their subtrees into one topologically sorted list
(next patch will update bdrv_replace_node() in this manner).
Test test_parallel_perm_update() is now passing, so move it out of
debugging "if".
We also need to support ignore_children in
bdrv_parent_perms_conflict()
For test 283 order of conflicting parents check is changed.
Note also that in bdrv_check_perm() we don't check for parents conflict
at root bs, as we may be in the middle of permission update in
bdrv_reopen_multiple(). bdrv_reopen_multiple() will be updated soon.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-14-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
We have too much comments for this feature. It seems better just don't
do it. Most of real users (tests don't count) have to create additional
reference.
Drop also comment in external_snapshot_prepare:
- bdrv_append doesn't "remove" old bs in common sense, it sounds
strange
- the fact that bdrv_append can fail is obvious from the context
- the fact that we must rollback all changes in transaction abort is
known (it's the direct role of abort)
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-5-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_append() is not quite good for inserting filters: it does extra
permission update in intermediate state, where filter get it filtered
child but is not yet replace it in a backing chain.
Some filters (for example backup-top) may want permissions even when
have no parents. And described intermediate state becomes invalid.
That's (half a) reason, why we need "inactive" state for backup-top
filter.
bdrv_append() will be improved later, now let's add a unit test.
Now test fails, so it runs only with -d flag. To run do
./test-bdrv-graph-mod -d -p /bdrv-graph-mod/append-greedy-filter
from <build-directory>/tests.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-4-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Add test to show that simple DFS recursion order is not correct for
permission update. Correct order is topological-sort order, which will
be introduced later.
Consider the block driver which has two filter children: one active
with exclusive write access and one inactive with no specific
permissions.
And, these two children has a common base child, like this:
┌─────┐ ┌──────┐
│ fl2 │ ◀── │ top │
└─────┘ └──────┘
│ │
│ │ w
│ ▼
│ ┌──────┐
│ │ fl1 │
│ └──────┘
│ │
│ │ w
│ ▼
│ ┌──────┐
└───────▶ │ base │
└──────┘
So, exclusive write is propagated.
Assume, we want to make fl2 active instead of fl1.
So, we set some option for top driver and do permission update.
If permission update (remember, it's DFS) goes first through
top->fl1->base branch it will succeed: it firstly drop exclusive write
permissions and than apply them for another BdrvChildren.
But if permission update goes first through top->fl2->base branch it
will fail, as when we try to update fl2->base child, old not yet
updated fl1->base child will be in conflict.
Now test fails, so it runs only with -d flag. To run do
./test-bdrv-graph-mod -d -p /bdrv-graph-mod/parallel-perm-update
from <build-directory>/tests.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-3-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Add the test that shows that concept of ignore_children is incomplete.
Actually, when we want to update something, ignoring permission of some
existing BdrvChild, we should ignore also the propagated effect of this
child to the other children. But that's not done. Better approach
(update permissions on already updated graph) will be implemented
later.
Now the test fails, so it's added with -d argument to not break make
check.
Test fails with
"Conflicts with use by fl1 as 'backing', which does not allow 'write' on base"
because when updating permissions we can ignore original top->fl1
BdrvChild. But we don't ignore exclusive write permission in fl1->base
BdrvChild, which is propagated. Correct thing to do is make graph
change first and then do permission update from the top node.
To run test do
./test-bdrv-graph-mod -d -p /bdrv-graph-mod/parallel-exclusive-write
from <build-directory>/tests.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-2-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Create a job that remains on STANDBY after a drained section, and see
that invoking job_wait_unpaused() will get it unstuck.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210409120422.144040-5-mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
V2:
- "tests: Add tests for yank with the chardev-change case" updated
- drop the readthedoc theme patch
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=UwXe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/marcandre/tags/for-6.0-pull-request' into staging
For 6.0 misc patches under my radar.
V2:
- "tests: Add tests for yank with the chardev-change case" updated
- drop the readthedoc theme patch
# gpg: Signature made Thu 01 Apr 2021 12:54:52 BST
# gpg: using RSA key 87A9BD933F87C606D276F62DDAE8E10975969CE5
# gpg: issuer "marcandre.lureau@redhat.com"
# gpg: Good signature from "Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>" [full]
# gpg: aka "Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@gmail.com>" [full]
# Primary key fingerprint: 87A9 BD93 3F87 C606 D276 F62D DAE8 E109 7596 9CE5
* remotes/marcandre/tags/for-6.0-pull-request:
tests: Add tests for yank with the chardev-change case
chardev: Fix yank with the chardev-change case
chardev/char.c: Always pass id to chardev_new
chardev/char.c: Move object_property_try_add_child out of chardev_new
yank: Always link full yank code
yank: Remove dependency on qiochannel
docs: simplify each section title
dbus-vmstate: Increase the size of input stream buffer used during load
util: fix use-after-free in module_load_one
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Test that rwlock upgrade is fair, and that readers go back to sleep if
a writer is in line.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20210325112941.365238-6-pbonzini@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Mingw recognizes that "0x" has value 0 without setting errno, but
fails to advance endptr to the trailing garbage 'x'. This in turn
showed up in our recent testsuite additions for qemu_strtosz (commit
1657ba44b4 utils: Enhance testsuite for do_strtosz()); adjust our
remaining tests to show that we now work around this windows bug.
This patch intentionally fails check-syntax for use of strtol.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210317143325.2165821-3-eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210323165308.15244-15-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Our tests were not validating the return value in all cases, nor was
it guaranteeing our documented claim that 'res' is unchanged on error.
For that matter, it wasn't as thorough as the existing tests for
qemu_strtoi() and friends for proving that endptr and res are sanely
set. Enhancing the test found one case where we violated our
documentation: namely, when failing with EINVAL when endptr is NULL,
we shouldn't modify res.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210317143325.2165821-2-eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210323165308.15244-14-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Command names should be lower-case. Enforce this. Fix the fixable
offenders (all in tests/), and add the remainder to pragma
command-name-exceptions.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210323094025.3569441-25-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Commit 967c885108 "qapi: add 'if' to top-level expressions" added
command TestIfCmd with an 'if' condition. It also added the
qmp_TestIfCmd() to go with it, guarded by the corresponding #if.
Commit ccadd6bcba "qapi: Add 'if' to implicit struct members" changed
the command, but not the function. Compiles only because we don't
satisfy the #if. Instead of fixing the function, simply drop it.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210323094025.3569441-22-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Event names should be ALL_CAPS with words separated by underscore.
Enforce this. The only offenders are in tests/. Fix them. Existing
test event-case covers the new error.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210323094025.3569441-14-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
When building qemu with GCC 11, test-block-iothread produces the following
warning:
../tests/unit/test-block-iothread.c:148:11: error: ‘buf’ may be used
uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
This is caused by buf[512] left uninitialized and passed to
bdrv_save_vmstate() that expects a const uint8_t *, so the compiler
assumes it will be read and expects the parameter to be initialized.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210319112218.49609-1-eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
This policy rejects deprecated input, and thus permits "testing the
future". Implement it for QMP command arguments: reject commands with
deprecated ones. Example: when QEMU is run with -compat
deprecated-input=reject, then
{"execute": "eject", "arguments": {"device": "cd"}}
fails like this
{"error": {"class": "GenericError", "desc": "Deprecated parameter 'device' disabled by policy"}}
When the deprecated parameter is removed, the error will change to
{"error": {"class": "GenericError", "desc": "Parameter 'device' is unexpected"}}
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210318155519.1224118-11-armbru@redhat.com>
This policy rejects deprecated input, and thus permits "testing the
future". Implement it for QMP commands: make deprecated ones fail.
Example: when QEMU is run with -compat deprecated-input=reject, then
{"execute": "query-cpus"}
fails like this
{"error": {"class": "CommandNotFound", "desc": "Deprecated command query-cpus disabled by policy"}}
When the deprecated command is removed, the error will change to
{"error": {"class": "CommandNotFound", "desc": "The command query-cpus has not been found"}}
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210318155519.1224118-10-armbru@redhat.com>
Without this stub, the next commit fails to link. I suspect the real
cause is 947e47448d "monitor: Use getter/setter functions for
cur_mon".
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210318155519.1224118-9-armbru@redhat.com>
This policy suppresses deprecated bits in output, and thus permits
"testing the future". Implement it for QMP event data: suppress
deprecated members.
No QMP event data is deprecated right now.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210318155519.1224118-6-armbru@redhat.com>
This policy suppresses deprecated bits in output, and thus permits
"testing the future". Implement it for QMP events: suppress
deprecated ones.
No QMP event is deprecated right now.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210318155519.1224118-5-armbru@redhat.com>
This policy suppresses deprecated bits in output, and thus permits
"testing the future". Implement it for QMP command results. Example:
when QEMU is run with -compat deprecated-output=hide, then
{"execute": "query-cpus-fast"}
yields
{"return": [{"thread-id": 9805, "props": {"core-id": 0, "thread-id": 0, "socket-id": 0}, "qom-path": "/machine/unattached/device[0]", "cpu-index": 0, "target": "x86_64"}]}
instead of
{"return": [{"arch": "x86", "thread-id": 22436, "props": {"core-id": 0, "thread-id": 0, "socket-id": 0}, "qom-path": "/machine/unattached/device[0]", "cpu-index": 0, "target": "x86_64"}]}
Note the suppression of deprecated member "arch".
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210318155519.1224118-4-armbru@redhat.com>
The command-line creation test is using QemuOpts. Switch it to keyval,
since the emulator has some special needs and thus the last user of
user_creatable_add_opts will go away with the next patch.
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210312173547.1283477-2-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
QAPI doesn't know the aliases 'tty' and 'parport' and there is no
reason to prefer them to the real names of the backends 'serial' and
'parallel'.
Since warnings are not allowed in 'make check' output, we can't test
the deprecated alias any more. Remove it from test-char.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210311164253.338723-3-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Once we've parsed the fractional value, extract it into an integral
64-bit fraction. Perform the scaling with integer arithmetic, and
simplify the overflow detection.
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210315155835.1970210-2-richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
* Clean-up and improve gitlab-ci jobs
* Drop the non-working "check-speed" makefile target
* Minor documentation updates
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=YxBC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/thuth-gitlab/tags/pull-request-2021-03-12' into staging
* Move unit and bench tests into separate directories
* Clean-up and improve gitlab-ci jobs
* Drop the non-working "check-speed" makefile target
* Minor documentation updates
# gpg: Signature made Fri 12 Mar 2021 17:18:45 GMT
# gpg: using RSA key 27B88847EEE0250118F3EAB92ED9D774FE702DB5
# gpg: issuer "thuth@redhat.com"
# gpg: Good signature from "Thomas Huth <th.huth@gmx.de>" [full]
# gpg: aka "Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>" [full]
# gpg: aka "Thomas Huth <huth@tuxfamily.org>" [full]
# gpg: aka "Thomas Huth <th.huth@posteo.de>" [unknown]
# Primary key fingerprint: 27B8 8847 EEE0 2501 18F3 EAB9 2ED9 D774 FE70 2DB5
* remotes/thuth-gitlab/tags/pull-request-2021-03-12:
README: Add Documentation blurb
MAINTAINERS: Merge the Gitlab-CI section into the generic CI section
tests: remove "make check-speed" in favor of "make bench"
gitlab-ci.yml: Merge check-crypto-old jobs into the build-crypto-old jobs
gitlab-ci.yml: Merge one of the coroutine jobs with the tcg-disabled job
gitlab-ci.yml: Add some missing dependencies to the jobs
gitlab-ci.yml: Move build-tools-and-docs-debian to a better place
tests: Move benchmarks into a separate folder
tests: Move unit tests into a separate directory
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The main tests directory still looks very crowded, and it's not
clear which files are part of a unit tests and which belong to
a different test subsystem. Let's clean up the mess and move the
unit tests to a separate directory.
Message-Id: <20210310063314.1049838-1-thuth@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
