Elevate s->in_flight early so that other incoming requests will wait
on the CoQueue in nbd_co_send_request; restart them after getting back
from nbd_reconnect_attempt. This could be after the reconnect timer or
nbd_cancel_in_flight have cancelled the attempt, so there is no
need anymore to cancel the requests there.
nbd_co_send_request now handles both stopping and restarting pending
requests after a successful connection, and there is no need to
hold send_mutex in nbd_co_do_establish_connection. The current setup
is confusing because nbd_co_do_establish_connection is called both with
send_mutex taken and without it. Before the patch it uses free_sema which
(at least in theory...) is protected by send_mutex, after the patch it
does not anymore.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220414175756.671165-5-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
[eblake: wrap long line]
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@openvz.org>
Reviewed-by: Lukas Straub <lukasstraub2@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
block coroutines functions run in different aiocontext, and are
not protected by the BQL. Therefore are I/O.
On the other side, generated_co_wrapper functions use BDRV_POLL_WHILE,
meaning the caller can either be the main loop or a specific iothread.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220303151616.325444-25-eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Let's drop hand-made coroutine wrappers and use coroutine wrapper
generation like in block/io.c.
Now, blk_foo() functions are written in same way as blk_co_foo() ones,
but wrap blk_do_foo() instead of blk_co_do_foo().
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20211006131718.214235-8-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
[eblake: spelling fix]
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20211006131718.214235-7-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
The only last step we need to reuse the function is coroutine-wrapper.
nbd_open() may be called from non-coroutine context. So, generate the
wrapper and use it.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210610100802.5888-31-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
When checking for allocation across a chain, it's already easy to
count the depth within the chain at which the allocation is found.
Instead of throwing that information away, return it to the caller.
Existing callers only cared about allocated/non-allocated, but having
a depth available will be used by NBD in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201027050556.269064-9-eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
[eblake: rebase to master]
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
In order to reuse bdrv_common_block_status_above in
bdrv_is_allocated_above, let's support include_base parameter.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20200924194003.22080-3-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Like for read/write in a previous commit, drop extra indirection layer,
generate directly bdrv_readv_vmstate() and bdrv_writev_vmstate().
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200924185414.28642-8-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Now that we are not maintaining boilerplate code for coroutine
wrappers, there is no more sense in keeping the extra indirection layer
of bdrv_prwv(). Let's drop it and instead generate pure bdrv_preadv()
and bdrv_pwritev().
Currently, bdrv_pwritev() and bdrv_preadv() are returning bytes on
success, auto generated functions will instead return zero, as their
_co_ prototype. Still, it's simple to make the conversion safe: the
only external user of bdrv_pwritev() is test-bdrv-drain, and it is
comfortable enough with bdrv_co_pwritev() instead. So prototypes are
moved to local block/coroutines.h. Next, the only internal use is
bdrv_pread() and bdrv_pwrite(), which are modified to return bytes on
success.
Of course, it would be great to convert bdrv_pread() and bdrv_pwrite()
to return 0 on success. But this requires audit (and probably
conversion) of all their users, let's leave it for another day
refactoring.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200924185414.28642-7-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Use code generation implemented in previous commit to generated
coroutine wrappers in block.c and block/io.c
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200924185414.28642-6-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
We are going to keep coroutine-wrappers code (structure-packing
parameters, BDRV_POLL wrapper functions) in separate auto-generated
files. So, we'll need a header with declaration of original _co_
functions, for those which are static now. As well, we'll need
declarations for wrapper functions. Do these declarations now, as a
preparation step.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200924185414.28642-4-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
