blk_get_geometry() eventually calls bdrv_nb_sectors(), which is a
co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_rdlock. This means that when it is called from
coroutine context, it already assume to have the graph locked.
However, virtio_blk_sect_range_ok() in block/export/virtio-blk-handler.c
(used by vhost-user-blk and VDUSE exports) runs in a coroutine, but
doesn't take the graph lock - blk_*() functions are generally expected
to do that internally. This causes an assertion failure when accessing
an export for the first time if it runs in an iothread.
This is an example of the crash:
$ ./storage-daemon/qemu-storage-daemon --object iothread,id=th0 --blockdev file,filename=/home/kwolf/images/hd.img,node-name=disk --export vhost-user-blk,addr.type=unix,addr.path=/tmp/vhost.sock,node-name=disk,id=exp0,iothread=th0
qemu-storage-daemon: ../block/graph-lock.c:268: void assert_bdrv_graph_readable(void): Assertion `qemu_in_main_thread() || reader_count()' failed.
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007ffff6eafe5c in __pthread_kill_implementation () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x00007ffff6e5fa76 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#2 0x00007ffff6e497fc in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#3 0x00007ffff6e4971b in __assert_fail_base.cold () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#4 0x00007ffff6e58656 in __assert_fail () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#5 0x00005555556337a3 in assert_bdrv_graph_readable () at ../block/graph-lock.c:268
#6 0x00005555555fd5a2 in bdrv_co_nb_sectors (bs=0x5555564c5ef0) at ../block.c:5847
#7 0x00005555555ee949 in bdrv_nb_sectors (bs=0x5555564c5ef0) at block/block-gen.c:256
#8 0x00005555555fd6b9 in bdrv_get_geometry (bs=0x5555564c5ef0, nb_sectors_ptr=0x7fffef7fedd0) at ../block.c:5884
#9 0x000055555562ad6d in blk_get_geometry (blk=0x5555564cb200, nb_sectors_ptr=0x7fffef7fedd0) at ../block/block-backend.c:1624
#10 0x00005555555ddb74 in virtio_blk_sect_range_ok (blk=0x5555564cb200, block_size=512, sector=0, size=512) at ../block/export/virtio-blk-handler.c:44
#11 0x00005555555dd80d in virtio_blk_process_req (handler=0x5555564cbb98, in_iov=0x7fffe8003830, out_iov=0x7fffe8003860, in_num=1, out_num=0) at ../block/export/virtio-blk-handler.c:189
#12 0x00005555555dd546 in vu_blk_virtio_process_req (opaque=0x7fffe8003800) at ../block/export/vhost-user-blk-server.c:66
#13 0x00005555557bf4a1 in coroutine_trampoline (i0=-402635264, i1=32767) at ../util/coroutine-ucontext.c:177
#14 0x00007ffff6e75c20 in ?? () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#15 0x00007fffefffa870 in ?? ()
#16 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
Fix this by creating a new blk_co_get_geometry() that takes the lock,
and changing blk_get_geometry() to be a co_wrapper_mixed around it.
To make the resulting code cleaner, virtio-blk-handler.c can directly
call the coroutine version now (though that wouldn't be necessary for
fixing the bug, taking the lock in blk_co_get_geometry() is what fixes
it).
Fixes: 8ab8140a04
Reported-by: Lukáš Doktor <ldoktor@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230327113959.60071-1-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
The barrier comes after an atomic increment, so it is enough to use
smp_mb__after_rmw(); this avoids a double barrier on x86 systems.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Add emulation of TP4146 ("Flexible Data Placement").
Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jesper Devantier <j.devantier@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
Add support for the Directive Send and Recv commands and the Identify
directive.
Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Gollu Appalanaidu <anaidu.gollu@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
Add the mandatory Endurance Group identify data structures and log
pages.
For now, all namespaces in a subsystem belongs to a single Endurance
Group.
Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_refresh_total_sectors() need to hold a reader lock for the
graph.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-24-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_*_dirty_bitmap() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-23-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_delete_file() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-22-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_register_buf() and bdrv_unregister_buf() need to hold a reader lock
for the graph.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-21-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_eject() and bdrv_co_lock_medium() need to hold a reader lock for
the graph.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-20-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_is_inserted() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
blk_is_inserted() is done as a co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_rdlock (unlike most
other blk_* functions) because it is called a lot from other blk_co_*()
functions that already hold the lock. These calls go through
blk_is_available(), which becomes a co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_rdlock, too,
for the same reason.
Functions that run in a coroutine and can call bdrv_co_is_available()
directly are changed to do so, which results in better TSA coverage.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-19-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_io_plug() and bdrv_co_io_unplug() need to hold a reader lock for
the graph.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-18-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_create() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-17-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-16-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_copy_range() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-15-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_pwrite_sync() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-13-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_pread*/pwrite*() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-12-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_driver_*() need to hold a reader lock for the graph. It doesn't add
the annotation to public functions yet.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-11-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-10-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_pdiscard() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-9-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_flush() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-8-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_ioctl() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-6-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_block_status() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-5-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_truncate() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-4-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
It is never called outside of block.c.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Images can't be opened in coroutine context because opening needs to
change the block graph. Add no_co_wrappers so that coroutines have a
simple way of opening images in a BH instead.
At the same time, mark the wrapped functions as no_coroutine_fn.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230126172432.436111-3-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Czenczek <hreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Some functions must not be called from coroutine context. The common
pattern to use them anyway from a coroutine is running them in a BH and
letting the calling coroutine yield to be woken up when the BH is
completed.
Instead of manually writing such wrappers, add support for generating
them to block-coroutine-wrapper.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230126172432.436111-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Czenczek <hreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This commit was created with scripts/clean-includes.
All .c should include qemu/osdep.h first. The script performs three
related cleanups:
* Ensure .c files include qemu/osdep.h first.
* Including it in a .h is redundant, since the .c already includes
it. Drop such inclusions.
* Likewise, including headers qemu/osdep.h includes is redundant.
Drop these, too.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230202133830.2152150-16-armbru@redhat.com>
Currently, when querying a qcow2 image, qemu-img info reports something
like this:
image: test.qcow2
file format: qcow2
virtual size: 64 MiB (67108864 bytes)
disk size: 196 KiB
cluster_size: 65536
Format specific information:
compat: 1.1
compression type: zlib
lazy refcounts: false
refcount bits: 16
corrupt: false
extended l2: false
Child node '/file':
image: test.qcow2
file format: file
virtual size: 192 KiB (197120 bytes)
disk size: 196 KiB
Format specific information:
extent size hint: 1048576
Notably, the way the keys are named is specific for image files: The
filename is shown under "image", the BDS driver under "file format", and
the BDS length under "virtual size". This does not make much sense for
nodes that are not actually supposed to be guest images, like the /file
child node shown above.
Give bdrv_node_info_dump() a @protocol parameter that gives a hint that
the respective node is probably just used for data storage and does not
necessarily present the data for a VM guest disk. This renames the keys
so that with this patch, the output becomes:
image: test.qcow2
[...]
Child node '/file':
filename: test.qcow2
protocol type: file
file length: 192 KiB (197120 bytes)
disk size: 196 KiB
Format specific information:
extent size hint: 1048576
(Perhaps we should also rename "Format specific information", but I
could not come up with anything better that will not become problematic
if we guess wrong with the protocol "heuristic".)
This change affects iotest 302, which has protocol node information in
its reference output.
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220620162704.80987-13-hreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
In order to let qemu-img info present a block graph, add a parameter to
bdrv_node_info_dump() and bdrv_image_info_specific_dump() so that the
information of nodes below the root level can be given an indentation.
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220620162704.80987-9-hreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Introduce a new QAPI type BlockGraphInfo and an associated
bdrv_query_block_graph_info() function that recursively gathers
BlockNodeInfo objects through a block graph.
A follow-up patch is going to make "qemu-img info" use this to print
information about all nodes that are (usually implicitly) opened for a
given image file.
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220620162704.80987-8-hreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
There is no real reason why bdrv_query_image_info() should generally not
recurse. The ImageInfo struct has a pointer to the backing image, so it
should generally be filled, unless the caller explicitly opts out.
This moves the recursing code from bdrv_block_device_info() into
bdrv_query_image_info().
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220620162704.80987-7-hreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
qemu-img info never uses ImageInfo's backing-image field, because it
opens the backing chain one by one with BDRV_O_NO_BACKING, and prints
all backing chain nodes' information consecutively. Use BlockNodeInfo
to make it clear that we only print information about a single node, and
that we are not using the backing-image field.
Notably, bdrv_image_info_dump() does not evaluate the backing-image
field, so we can easily make it take a BlockNodeInfo pointer (and
consequentially rename it to bdrv_node_info_dump()). It makes more
sense this way, because again, the interface now makes it syntactically
clear that backing-image is ignored by this function.
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220620162704.80987-6-hreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
ImageInfo sometimes contains flat information, and sometimes it does
not. Split off a BlockNodeInfo struct, which only contains information
about a single node and has no link to the backing image.
We do this so we can extend BlockNodeInfo to a BlockGraphInfo struct,
which has links to all child nodes, not just the backing node. It would
be strange to base BlockGraphInfo on ImageInfo, because then this
extended struct would have two links to the backing node (one in
BlockGraphInfo as one of all the child links, and one in ImageInfo).
Furthermore, it is quite common to ignore the backing-image field
altogether: bdrv_query_image_info() does not set it, and
bdrv_image_info_dump() does not evaluate it. That signals that we
should have different structs for describing a single node and one that
has a link to the backing image.
Still, bdrv_query_image_info() and bdrv_image_info_dump() are not
changed too much in this patch. Follow-up patches will handle them.
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220620162704.80987-5-hreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
When a block driver supports obtaining format-specific information, but
that object only contains optional fields, it is possible that none of
them are present, so that dump_qobject() (called by
bdrv_image_info_specific_dump()) will not print anything.
The callers of bdrv_image_info_specific_dump() put a header above this
information ("Format specific information:\n"), which will look strange
when there is nothing below. Modify bdrv_image_info_specific_dump() to
print this header instead of its callers, and only if there is indeed
something to be printed.
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220620162704.80987-2-hreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
The inlined nbd_readXX() functions call beXX_to_cpu(), themselves
declared in <qemu/bswap.h>. This fixes when refactoring:
In file included from ../../block/nbd.c:44:
include/block/nbd.h: In function 'nbd_read16':
include/block/nbd.h:383:12: error: implicit declaration of function 'be16_to_cpu' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
383 | *val = be##bits##_to_cpu(*val); \
| ^~
include/block/nbd.h:387:1: note: in expansion of macro 'DEF_NBD_READ_N'
387 | DEF_NBD_READ_N(16) /* Defines nbd_read16(). */
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20221125175328.48539-1-philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Since these functions always run in coroutine context, adjust
their name to include "_co_", just like all other BlockDriver callbacks.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-15-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_debug_event() is categorized as an I/O function, and it currently
doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph rdlock since
it traverses the block nodes graph, which however is only possible in a
coroutine.
Therefore turn it into a co_wrapper_mixed to move the actual function
into a coroutine where the lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-14-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_lock_medium() is categorized as an I/O function, and it currently
doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph rdlock since
it traverses the block nodes graph, which however is only possible in a
coroutine.
The only caller of this function is blk_lock_medium(). Therefore make
blk_lock_medium() a co_wrapper, so that it always creates a new
coroutine, and then make bdrv_lock_medium() a coroutine_fn where the
lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-13-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_eject() is categorized as an I/O function, and it currently
doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph rdlock since
it traverses the block nodes graph, which however is only possible in a
coroutine.
The only caller of this function is blk_eject(). Therefore make
blk_eject() a co_wrapper, so that it always creates a new coroutine, and
then make bdrv_eject() coroutine_fn where the lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-12-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_get_info() is categorized as an I/O function, and it currently
doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph rdlock since
it traverses the block nodes graph, which however is only possible in a
coroutine.
Therefore turn it into a co_wrapper to move the actual function into a
coroutine where the lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-11-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_get_allocated_file_size() is categorized as an I/O function, and it
currently doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph
rdlock since it traverses the block nodes graph, which however is only
possible in a coroutine.
Therefore turn it into a co_wrapper to move the actual function into a
coroutine where the lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-10-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
BlockDriver->bdrv_getlength is categorized as IO callback, and it
currently doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph
rdlock since the callback traverses the block nodes graph, which however
is only possible in a coroutine.
Therefore turn it into a co_wrapper to move the actual function into a
coroutine where the lock can be taken.
Because now this function creates a new coroutine and polls, we need to
take the AioContext lock where it is missing, for the only reason that
internally co_wrapper calls AIO_WAIT_WHILE and it expects to release the
AioContext lock.
This is especially messy when a co_wrapper creates a coroutine and polls
in bdrv_open_driver, because this function has so many callers in so
many context that it can easily lead to deadlocks. Therefore the new
rule for bdrv_open_driver is that the caller must always hold the
AioContext lock of the given bs (except if it is a coroutine), because
the function calls bdrv_refresh_total_sectors() which is now a
co_wrapper.
Once the rwlock is ultimated and placed in every place it needs to be,
we will poll using AIO_WAIT_WHILE_UNLOCKED and remove the AioContext
lock.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-7-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
The name is not good, not the least because we are going to convert this
to a generated co_wrapper, which adds a _co infix after the first part
of the name.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-6-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_is_inserted() is categorized as an I/O function, and it currently
doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph rdlock since
it traverses the block nodes graph, which however is only possible in a
coroutine.
Therefore turn it into a co_wrapper to move the actual function into a
coroutine where the lock can be taken.
At the same time, add also blk_is_inserted as co_wrapper_mixed, since it
is called in both coroutine and non-coroutine contexts.
Because now this function creates a new coroutine and polls, we need to
take the AioContext lock where it is missing, for the only reason that
internally c_w_mixed_bdrv_rdlock calls AIO_WAIT_WHILE and it expects to
release the AioContext lock. Once the rwlock is ultimated and placed in
every place it needs to be, we will poll using AIO_WAIT_WHILE_UNLOCKED
and remove the AioContext lock.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-5-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
BlockDriver->bdrv_io_unplug is categorized as IO callback, and it
currently doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph
rdlock since the callback traverses the block nodes graph, which however
is only possible in a coroutine.
The only caller of this function is blk_io_unplug(), therefore make
blk_io_unplug() a co_wrapper, so that we're always running in a
coroutine where the lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-4-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
BlockDriver->bdrv_io_plug is categorized as IO callback, and it
currently doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph
rdlock since the callback traverses the block nodes graph, which however
is only possible in a coroutine.
The only caller of this function is blk_io_plug(), therefore make
blk_io_plug() a co_wrapper, so that we're always running in a coroutine
where the lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-3-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
It has only one caller---inline it and remove the function.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221215130225.476477-2-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
