Popular glibc based distributions[1] require minimum
2.6.32 as kernel version. For some targets 2.6.18
would be enough, but dropping so low would mean some
suboptimal system calls could get used.
Set the minimum kernel advertized to 2.6.32 for
all architectures but aarch64 to ensure working qemu
linux-user in case host kernel is older.
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/921078
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
Creating target_structs header in linux-user/$arch/ and making
target_ipc_perm and target_shmid_ds its first inhabitants.
The struct defintions may/should be further fine-tuned by arch maintainers.
Signed-off-by: Petar Jovanovic <petar.jovanovic@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
Linux manages to have three separate orderings of the arguments to
the clone() syscall on different architectures. In the kernel these
are selected via CONFIG_CLONE_BACKWARDS and CONFIG_CLONE_BACKWARDS2.
Clean up our implementation of this to use similar #define names
rather than a TARGET_* ifdef ladder.
This includes behaviour changes fixing bugs on cris, x86-64, m68k,
openrisc and unicore32. cris had explicit but wrong handling; the
others were just incorrectly using QEMU's default, which happened
to be the equivalent of CONFIG_CLONE_BACKWARDS. (unicore32 appears
to be broken in the mainline kernel in that it tries to use arg3 for
both parent_tidptr and newtls simultaneously -- we don't attempt
to emulate this bug...)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
The functions cpu_clone_regs() and cpu_set_tls() are not purely CPU
related -- they are specific to the TLS ABI for a a particular OS.
Move them into the linux-user/ tree where they belong.
target-lm32 had entirely unused implementations, since it has no
linux-user target; just drop them.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
Add syscall numbers for new syscall numbers; this brings us
into line with Linux 2.6.39.2.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
In the very least, a change like this requires discussion on the list.
The naming convention is goofy and it causes a massive merge problem. Something
like this _must_ be presented on the list first so people can provide input
and cope with it.
This reverts commit 99a0949b72.
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
