This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_flush() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-8-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_ioctl() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-6-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_block_status() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-5-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_truncate() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-4-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
It is never called outside of block.c.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Images can't be opened in coroutine context because opening needs to
change the block graph. Add no_co_wrappers so that coroutines have a
simple way of opening images in a BH instead.
At the same time, mark the wrapped functions as no_coroutine_fn.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230126172432.436111-3-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Czenczek <hreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Some functions must not be called from coroutine context. The common
pattern to use them anyway from a coroutine is running them in a BH and
letting the calling coroutine yield to be woken up when the BH is
completed.
Instead of manually writing such wrappers, add support for generating
them to block-coroutine-wrapper.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230126172432.436111-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Czenczek <hreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This commit was created with scripts/clean-includes.
All .c should include qemu/osdep.h first. The script performs three
related cleanups:
* Ensure .c files include qemu/osdep.h first.
* Including it in a .h is redundant, since the .c already includes
it. Drop such inclusions.
* Likewise, including headers qemu/osdep.h includes is redundant.
Drop these, too.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230202133830.2152150-16-armbru@redhat.com>
Currently, when querying a qcow2 image, qemu-img info reports something
like this:
image: test.qcow2
file format: qcow2
virtual size: 64 MiB (67108864 bytes)
disk size: 196 KiB
cluster_size: 65536
Format specific information:
compat: 1.1
compression type: zlib
lazy refcounts: false
refcount bits: 16
corrupt: false
extended l2: false
Child node '/file':
image: test.qcow2
file format: file
virtual size: 192 KiB (197120 bytes)
disk size: 196 KiB
Format specific information:
extent size hint: 1048576
Notably, the way the keys are named is specific for image files: The
filename is shown under "image", the BDS driver under "file format", and
the BDS length under "virtual size". This does not make much sense for
nodes that are not actually supposed to be guest images, like the /file
child node shown above.
Give bdrv_node_info_dump() a @protocol parameter that gives a hint that
the respective node is probably just used for data storage and does not
necessarily present the data for a VM guest disk. This renames the keys
so that with this patch, the output becomes:
image: test.qcow2
[...]
Child node '/file':
filename: test.qcow2
protocol type: file
file length: 192 KiB (197120 bytes)
disk size: 196 KiB
Format specific information:
extent size hint: 1048576
(Perhaps we should also rename "Format specific information", but I
could not come up with anything better that will not become problematic
if we guess wrong with the protocol "heuristic".)
This change affects iotest 302, which has protocol node information in
its reference output.
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220620162704.80987-13-hreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
In order to let qemu-img info present a block graph, add a parameter to
bdrv_node_info_dump() and bdrv_image_info_specific_dump() so that the
information of nodes below the root level can be given an indentation.
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220620162704.80987-9-hreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Introduce a new QAPI type BlockGraphInfo and an associated
bdrv_query_block_graph_info() function that recursively gathers
BlockNodeInfo objects through a block graph.
A follow-up patch is going to make "qemu-img info" use this to print
information about all nodes that are (usually implicitly) opened for a
given image file.
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220620162704.80987-8-hreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
There is no real reason why bdrv_query_image_info() should generally not
recurse. The ImageInfo struct has a pointer to the backing image, so it
should generally be filled, unless the caller explicitly opts out.
This moves the recursing code from bdrv_block_device_info() into
bdrv_query_image_info().
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220620162704.80987-7-hreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
qemu-img info never uses ImageInfo's backing-image field, because it
opens the backing chain one by one with BDRV_O_NO_BACKING, and prints
all backing chain nodes' information consecutively. Use BlockNodeInfo
to make it clear that we only print information about a single node, and
that we are not using the backing-image field.
Notably, bdrv_image_info_dump() does not evaluate the backing-image
field, so we can easily make it take a BlockNodeInfo pointer (and
consequentially rename it to bdrv_node_info_dump()). It makes more
sense this way, because again, the interface now makes it syntactically
clear that backing-image is ignored by this function.
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220620162704.80987-6-hreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
ImageInfo sometimes contains flat information, and sometimes it does
not. Split off a BlockNodeInfo struct, which only contains information
about a single node and has no link to the backing image.
We do this so we can extend BlockNodeInfo to a BlockGraphInfo struct,
which has links to all child nodes, not just the backing node. It would
be strange to base BlockGraphInfo on ImageInfo, because then this
extended struct would have two links to the backing node (one in
BlockGraphInfo as one of all the child links, and one in ImageInfo).
Furthermore, it is quite common to ignore the backing-image field
altogether: bdrv_query_image_info() does not set it, and
bdrv_image_info_dump() does not evaluate it. That signals that we
should have different structs for describing a single node and one that
has a link to the backing image.
Still, bdrv_query_image_info() and bdrv_image_info_dump() are not
changed too much in this patch. Follow-up patches will handle them.
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220620162704.80987-5-hreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
When a block driver supports obtaining format-specific information, but
that object only contains optional fields, it is possible that none of
them are present, so that dump_qobject() (called by
bdrv_image_info_specific_dump()) will not print anything.
The callers of bdrv_image_info_specific_dump() put a header above this
information ("Format specific information:\n"), which will look strange
when there is nothing below. Modify bdrv_image_info_specific_dump() to
print this header instead of its callers, and only if there is indeed
something to be printed.
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220620162704.80987-2-hreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
The inlined nbd_readXX() functions call beXX_to_cpu(), themselves
declared in <qemu/bswap.h>. This fixes when refactoring:
In file included from ../../block/nbd.c:44:
include/block/nbd.h: In function 'nbd_read16':
include/block/nbd.h:383:12: error: implicit declaration of function 'be16_to_cpu' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
383 | *val = be##bits##_to_cpu(*val); \
| ^~
include/block/nbd.h:387:1: note: in expansion of macro 'DEF_NBD_READ_N'
387 | DEF_NBD_READ_N(16) /* Defines nbd_read16(). */
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20221125175328.48539-1-philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Since these functions always run in coroutine context, adjust
their name to include "_co_", just like all other BlockDriver callbacks.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-15-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_debug_event() is categorized as an I/O function, and it currently
doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph rdlock since
it traverses the block nodes graph, which however is only possible in a
coroutine.
Therefore turn it into a co_wrapper_mixed to move the actual function
into a coroutine where the lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-14-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_lock_medium() is categorized as an I/O function, and it currently
doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph rdlock since
it traverses the block nodes graph, which however is only possible in a
coroutine.
The only caller of this function is blk_lock_medium(). Therefore make
blk_lock_medium() a co_wrapper, so that it always creates a new
coroutine, and then make bdrv_lock_medium() a coroutine_fn where the
lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-13-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_eject() is categorized as an I/O function, and it currently
doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph rdlock since
it traverses the block nodes graph, which however is only possible in a
coroutine.
The only caller of this function is blk_eject(). Therefore make
blk_eject() a co_wrapper, so that it always creates a new coroutine, and
then make bdrv_eject() coroutine_fn where the lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-12-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_get_info() is categorized as an I/O function, and it currently
doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph rdlock since
it traverses the block nodes graph, which however is only possible in a
coroutine.
Therefore turn it into a co_wrapper to move the actual function into a
coroutine where the lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-11-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_get_allocated_file_size() is categorized as an I/O function, and it
currently doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph
rdlock since it traverses the block nodes graph, which however is only
possible in a coroutine.
Therefore turn it into a co_wrapper to move the actual function into a
coroutine where the lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-10-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
BlockDriver->bdrv_getlength is categorized as IO callback, and it
currently doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph
rdlock since the callback traverses the block nodes graph, which however
is only possible in a coroutine.
Therefore turn it into a co_wrapper to move the actual function into a
coroutine where the lock can be taken.
Because now this function creates a new coroutine and polls, we need to
take the AioContext lock where it is missing, for the only reason that
internally co_wrapper calls AIO_WAIT_WHILE and it expects to release the
AioContext lock.
This is especially messy when a co_wrapper creates a coroutine and polls
in bdrv_open_driver, because this function has so many callers in so
many context that it can easily lead to deadlocks. Therefore the new
rule for bdrv_open_driver is that the caller must always hold the
AioContext lock of the given bs (except if it is a coroutine), because
the function calls bdrv_refresh_total_sectors() which is now a
co_wrapper.
Once the rwlock is ultimated and placed in every place it needs to be,
we will poll using AIO_WAIT_WHILE_UNLOCKED and remove the AioContext
lock.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-7-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
The name is not good, not the least because we are going to convert this
to a generated co_wrapper, which adds a _co infix after the first part
of the name.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-6-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_is_inserted() is categorized as an I/O function, and it currently
doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph rdlock since
it traverses the block nodes graph, which however is only possible in a
coroutine.
Therefore turn it into a co_wrapper to move the actual function into a
coroutine where the lock can be taken.
At the same time, add also blk_is_inserted as co_wrapper_mixed, since it
is called in both coroutine and non-coroutine contexts.
Because now this function creates a new coroutine and polls, we need to
take the AioContext lock where it is missing, for the only reason that
internally c_w_mixed_bdrv_rdlock calls AIO_WAIT_WHILE and it expects to
release the AioContext lock. Once the rwlock is ultimated and placed in
every place it needs to be, we will poll using AIO_WAIT_WHILE_UNLOCKED
and remove the AioContext lock.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-5-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
BlockDriver->bdrv_io_unplug is categorized as IO callback, and it
currently doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph
rdlock since the callback traverses the block nodes graph, which however
is only possible in a coroutine.
The only caller of this function is blk_io_unplug(), therefore make
blk_io_unplug() a co_wrapper, so that we're always running in a
coroutine where the lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-4-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
BlockDriver->bdrv_io_plug is categorized as IO callback, and it
currently doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph
rdlock since the callback traverses the block nodes graph, which however
is only possible in a coroutine.
The only caller of this function is blk_io_plug(), therefore make
blk_io_plug() a co_wrapper, so that we're always running in a coroutine
where the lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-3-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
It has only one caller---inline it and remove the function.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221215130225.476477-2-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Add more annotations to functions, describing valid and invalid
calls from coroutine to non-coroutine context.
When applied to a function, no_coroutine_fn advertises that it should
not be called from coroutine_fn functions. This can be because the
function blocks or, in the case of generated_co_wrapper, to enforce
that coroutine_fn functions directly call the coroutine_fn that backs
the generated_co_wrapper.
coroutine_mixed_fn instead is for function that can be called in
both coroutine and non-coroutine context, but will suspend when
called in coroutine context. Annotating them is a first step
towards enforcing that non-annotated functions are absolutely
not going to suspend.
These can be used for example with the vrc tool:
# find functions that *really* cannot be called from no_coroutine_fn
(vrc) load --loader clang libblock.fa.p/meson-generated_.._block_block-gen.c.o
(vrc) paths [no_coroutine_fn,!coroutine_mixed_fn]
bdrv_remove_persistent_dirty_bitmap
bdrv_create
bdrv_can_store_new_dirty_bitmap
# find how coroutine_fns end up calling a mixed function
(vrc) load --loader clang --force libblock.fa.p/*.c.o
(vrc) paths [coroutine_fn] [!no_coroutine_fn]* [coroutine_mixed_fn]
...
bdrv_pread <- vhdx_log_write <- vhdx_log_write_and_flush <- vhdx_co_writev
...
Signed-off-by: Alberto Faria <afaria@redhat.com>
[Rebase, add coroutine_mixed_fn. - Paolo]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221216110758.559947-3-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
We have two inclusion loops:
block/block.h
-> block/block-global-state.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h
block/block.h
-> block/block-io.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h
I believe these go back to Emanuele's reorganization of the block API,
merged a few months ago in commit d7e2fe4aac.
Fortunately, breaking them is merely a matter of deleting unnecessary
includes from headers, and adding them back in places where they are
now missing.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221221133551.3967339-2-armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20221221131435.3851212-6-armbru@redhat.com>
qemu/coroutine.h and qemu/lockable.h include each other.
They need each other only in macro expansions, so we could simply drop
both inclusions to break the loop, and add suitable includes to files
that expand the macros.
Instead, move a part of qemu/coroutine.h to new qemu/coroutine-core.h
so that qemu/coroutine-core.h doesn't need qemu/lockable.h, and
qemu/lockable.h only needs qemu/coroutine-core.h. Result:
qemu/coroutine.h includes qemu/lockable.h includes
qemu/coroutine-core.h.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221221131435.3851212-5-armbru@redhat.com>
[Semantic rebase conflict with 7c10cb38cc "accel/tcg: Add debuginfo
support" resolved]
block/block-hmp-cmds.h and qemu/co-shared-resource.h use coroutine_fn
without including qemu/coroutine.h. They compile only if it's already
included from elsewhere.
I could fix that, but pulling in qemu/coroutine.h and everything it
includes just for a macro that expands into nothing feels silly.
Instead, move the macro to qemu/osdep.h.
Inclusions of qemu/coroutine.h just for coroutine_fn become
superfluous. Drop them.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221221131435.3851212-3-armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221221131435.3851212-2-armbru@redhat.com>
The generated coroutine wrappers already take care to take the lock in
the non-coroutine path, and assume that the lock is already taken in the
coroutine path.
The only thing we need to do for the wrapped function is adding the
GRAPH_RDLOCK annotation. Doing so also allows us to mark the
corresponding callbacks in BlockDriver as GRAPH_RDLOCK_PTR.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221207131838.239125-19-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Take the rdlock already, before we add the assertions.
All these functions either read the graph recursively, or call
BlockDriver callbacks that will eventually need to be protected by the
graph rdlock.
Do it now to all functions together, because many of these recursively
call each other.
For example, bdrv_co_truncate calls BlockDriver->bdrv_co_truncate, and
some driver callbacks implement their own .bdrv_co_truncate by calling
bdrv_flush inside. So if bdrv_flush asserts but bdrv_truncate does not
take the rdlock yet, the assertion will always fail.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221207131838.239125-18-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Add co_wrapper_bdrv_rdlock and co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_rdlock option to
the block-coroutine-wrapper.py script.
This "_bdrv_rdlock" option takes and releases the graph rdlock when a
coroutine function is created.
This means that when used together with "_mixed", the function marked
with co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_rdlock will support both coroutine and
non-coroutine case, and in the latter case it will create a coroutine
that takes and releases the rdlock. When called from a coroutine, the
caller must already hold the graph lock.
Example:
void co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_rdlock bdrv_f1();
Becomes
static void bdrv_co_enter_f1()
{
bdrv_graph_co_rdlock();
bdrv_co_function();
bdrv_graph_co_rdunlock();
}
void bdrv_f1()
{
if (qemu_in_coroutine) {
assume_graph_lock();
bdrv_co_function();
} else {
qemu_co_enter(bdrv_co_enter_f1);
...
}
}
When used alone, the function will not work in coroutine context, and
when called in non-coroutine context it will create a new coroutine that
takes care of taking and releasing the rdlock automatically.
Example:
void co_wrapper_bdrv_rdlock bdrv_f1();
Becomes
static void bdrv_co_enter_f1()
{
bdrv_graph_co_rdlock();
bdrv_co_function();
bdrv_graph_co_rdunlock();
}
void bdrv_f1()
{
assert(!qemu_in_coroutine());
qemu_co_enter(bdrv_co_enter_f1);
...
}
About their usage:
- co_wrapper does not take the rdlock, so it can be used also outside
the block layer.
- co_wrapper_mixed will be used by many blk_* functions, since the
coroutine function needs to call blk_wait_while_drained() and
the rdlock *must* be taken afterwards, otherwise it's a deadlock.
In the future this annotation will go away, and blk_* will use
co_wrapper directly.
- co_wrapper_bdrv_rdlock will be used by BlockDriver callbacks, ideally
by all of them in the future.
- co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_rdlock will be used by the remaining functions
that are still called by coroutine and non-coroutine context. In the
future this annotation will go away, as we will split such mixed
functions.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221207131838.239125-17-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221207131838.239125-16-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221207131838.239125-15-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Remove the old assert_bdrv_graph_writable, and replace it with
the new version using graph-lock API.
See the function documentation for more information.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221207131838.239125-14-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Similar to the implementation in lockable.h, implement macros to
automatically take and release the rdlock.
Create the empty GraphLockable and GraphLockableMainloop structs only to
use it as a type for G_DEFINE_AUTOPTR_CLEANUP_FUNC.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221207131838.239125-4-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Block layer graph operations are always run under BQL in the main loop.
This is proved by the assertion qemu_in_main_thread() and its wrapper
macro GLOBAL_STATE_CODE.
However, there are also concurrent coroutines running in other iothreads
that always try to traverse the graph. Currently this is protected
(among various other things) by the AioContext lock, but once this is
removed, we need to make sure that reads do not happen while modifying
the graph.
We distinguish between writer (main loop, under BQL) that modifies the
graph, and readers (all other coroutines running in various AioContext),
that go through the graph edges, reading ->parents and->children.
The writer (main loop) has "exclusive" access, so it first waits for any
current read to finish, and then prevents incoming ones from entering
while it has the exclusive access.
The readers (coroutines in multiple AioContext) are free to access the
graph as long the writer is not modifying the graph. In case it is, they
go in a CoQueue and sleep until the writer is done.
If a coroutine changes AioContext, the counter in the original and new
AioContext are left intact, since the writer does not care where the
reader is, but only if there is one.
As a result, some AioContexts might have a negative reader count, to
balance the positive count of the AioContext that took the lock. This
also means that when an AioContext is deleted it may have a nonzero
reader count. In that case we transfer the count to a global shared
counter so that the writer is always aware of all readers.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221207131838.239125-3-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Provide a separate function that just quiesces the users of a node to
prevent new requests from coming in, but without waiting for the already
in-flight I/O to complete.
This function can be used in contexts where polling is not allowed.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221207131838.239125-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_can_store_new_dirty_bitmap and bdrv_remove_persistent_dirty_bitmap
check if they are running in a coroutine, directly calling the
coroutine callback if it's the case.
Except that no coroutine calls such functions, therefore that check
can be removed, and function creation can be offloaded to
c_w.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20221128142337.657646-15-eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This function is never called in coroutine context, therefore
instead of manually creating a new coroutine, delegate it to the
block-coroutine-wrapper script, defining it as co_wrapper.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20221128142337.657646-14-eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This new annotation starts just a function wrapper that creates
a new coroutine. It assumes the caller is not a coroutine.
It will be the default annotation to be used in the future.
This is much better as c_w_mixed, because it is clear if the caller
is a coroutine or not, and provides the advantage of automating
the code creation. In the future all c_w_mixed functions will be
substituted by co_wrapper.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20221128142337.657646-11-eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
In preparation to the incoming new function specifiers,
rename g_c_w with a more meaningful name and document it.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20221128142337.657646-10-eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
It is always called in coroutine_fn callbacks, therefore
it can directly call bdrv_co_create().
Rename it to bdrv_co_create_file too.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20221128142337.657646-9-eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
These functions end up calling bdrv_common_block_status_above(), a
generated_co_wrapper function.
In addition, they also happen to be always called in coroutine context,
meaning all callers are coroutine_fn.
This means that the g_c_w function will enter the qemu_in_coroutine()
case and eventually suspend (or in other words call qemu_coroutine_yield()).
Therefore we can mark such functions coroutine_fn too.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20221128142337.657646-3-eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_common_block_status_above() is a g_c_w, and it is being called by
many "wrapper" functions like bdrv_is_allocated(),
bdrv_is_allocated_above() and bdrv_block_status_above().
Because we want to eventually split the coroutine from non-coroutine
case in g_c_w, create duplicate wrappers that take care of directly
calling the same coroutine functions called in the g_c_w.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20221128142337.657646-2-eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
