The target_to_host_bitmask() and host_to_target_bitmask() functions
and the associated struct bitmask_transtbl are completely generic,
but for historical reasons the target related fields and parameters
are named 'x86' and the host related fields are named 'alpha'.
Rename them to 'target' and 'host'.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
The thunk_type_size_array() and thunk_type_align_array() functions
are only provided if NO_THUNK_TYPE_SIZE is not defined. However
nothing in the codebase defines that, and so in fact these functions
are always present. Drop the unnecessary #ifdefs.
(Over a decade ago thunk.h used to be included by some softmmu
files, which defined NO_THUNK_TYPE_SIZE, but these includes are
long gone; see for instance commit f193c7979c2f7.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Clean up includes so that osdep.h is included first and headers
which it implies are not included manually.
This commit was created with scripts/clean-includes.
NB: If this commit breaks compilation for your out-of-tree
patchseries or fork, then you need to make sure you add
#include "qemu/osdep.h" to any new .c files that you have.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
We store all struct types in an array of static size without ever
checking whether we overrun it. Of course some day someone (like me
in another, ancient ALSA enabling patch set) will run into the limit
without realizing it.
So let's make the allocation dynamic. We already know the number of
structs that we want to allocate, so we only need to pass the variable
into the respective piece of code.
Also, to ensure we don't accidently overwrite random memory, add some
asserts to sanity check whether a thunk is actually part of our array.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
The ARM EABI specifies that 64 bit integers should be
8 aligned; remove our incorrect setting of 4 alignment.
This has no actual effect since it only set the alignment
for the 'abi_ullong' and 'abi_llong' types, which are used
only inside code which is MIPS-specific, but it will
avoid problems later if we use the types elsewhere.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The alignment is a characteristic of the ABI, not the CPU.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>
Previously, this was done for target_long/ulong, and propagated to
abi_long/ulong via a typedef. But target_long/ulong should not
have any specific alignment, it is never used to access guest
memory.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>
The alignment is a characteristic of the ABI, not the CPU.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>
The alignment is a characteristic of the ABI, not the CPU.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>
