The non-signalling versions of VSX scalar convert to shorter/longer
precision insns doesn't silence SNaNs in the hardware. To better match
this behavior, use the non-arithmatic conversion of helper_todouble
instead of float32_to_float64. A test is added to prevent future
regressions.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Ferst <matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br>
Message-Id: <20211228120310.1957990-1-matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Added tests for the mtfsf to check if FI bit of FPSCR is being set
and if exception calls are being made correctly.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Mateus Castro (alqotel) <lucas.araujo@eldorado.org.br>
Message-Id: <20211201163808.440385-3-lucas.araujo@eldorado.org.br>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
With a host compiler new enough to recognize power10 insns,
CROSS_CC_HAS_POWER10 is true, but we do not supply the -cpu
option to the compiler, resulting in
/tmp/ccAVdYJd.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccAVdYJd.s:49: Error: unrecognized opcode: `brh'
/tmp/ccAVdYJd.s:78: Error: unrecognized opcode: `brw'
/tmp/ccAVdYJd.s:107: Error: unrecognized opcode: `brd'
make[2]: *** [byte_reverse] Error 1
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
We should use cpu_read_xer/cpu_write_xer to save/restore the complete
register since some of its bits are in other fields of CPUPPCState. A
test is added to prevent future regressions.
Fixes: da91a00f19 ("target-ppc: Split out SO, OV, CA fields from XER")
Signed-off-by: Matheus Ferst <matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br>
Message-Id: <20211014223234.127012-2-matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Tests for Byte-Reverse Halfword, Word and Doubleword
Signed-off-by: Matheus Ferst <matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br>
Tested-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
[AJB: tweak to make rules for skip/plugins]
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20210423205757.1752480-3-matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br>
Message-Id: <20210512102051.12134-28-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
The commit d03b174a83 (target/ppc: simplify bcdadd/sub functions)
meant to simplify some of the code but it inadvertently altered the
way the CR6 field is set after the operation has overflowed.
The CR6 bits are set based on the *unbounded* result of the operation,
so we need to look at the result before returning from bcd_add_mag,
otherwise we will look at 0 when it overflows.
Consider the following subtraction:
v0 = 0x9999999999999999999999999999999c (maximum positive BCD value)
v1 = 0x0000000000000000000000000000001d (negative one BCD value)
bcdsub. v0,v0,v1,0
The Power ISA 2.07B says:
If the unbounded result is greater than zero, do the following.
If PS=0, the sign code of the result is set to 0b1100.
If PS=1, the sign code of the result is set to 0b1111.
If the operation overflows, CR field 6 is set to 0b0101. Otherwise,
CR field 6 is set to 0b0100.
POWER9 hardware:
vr0 = 0x0000000000000000000000000000000c (positive zero BCD value)
cr6 = 0b0101 (0x5) (positive, overflow)
QEMU:
vr0 = 0x0000000000000000000000000000000c (positive zero BCD value)
cr6 = 0b0011 (0x3) (zero, overflow) <--- wrong
This patch reverts the part of d03b174a83 that introduced the
problem and adds a test-case to avoid further regressions:
before:
$ make run-tcg-tests-ppc64le-linux-user
(...)
TEST bcdsub on ppc64le
bcdsub: qemu/tests/tcg/ppc64le/bcdsub.c:58: test_bcdsub_gt:
Assertion `(cr >> 4) == ((1 << 2) | (1 << 0))' failed.
Fixes: d03b174a83 (target/ppc: simplify bcdadd/sub functions)
Reported-by: Paul Clarke <pc@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20210222194035.2723056-1-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
