This CXL component isn't allowed to have a RAS capability.
Whilst this should be harmless as software is not expected to look
here, good to clean it up.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20240215155206.2736-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Previously not all references mentioned any spec version at all.
Given r3.1 is the current specification available for evaluation at
www.computeexpresslink.org update references to refer to that.
Hopefully this won't become a never ending job.
A few structure definitions have been updated to add new fields.
Defaults of 0 and read only are valid choices for these new DVSEC
registers so go with that for now.
There are additional error codes and some of the 'questions' in
the comments are resolved now.
Update documentation reference to point to the CXL r3.1 specification
with naming closer to what is on the cover.
For cases where there are structure version numbers, add defines
so they can be found next to the register definitions.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20240126121636.24611-6-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Part of bringing all of CXL emulation inline with CXL r3.1.
No functional changes.
Reviewed-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20240126121636.24611-4-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Part of standardizing the QEMU code on CXL r3.1.
No fuctional changes as everything added is optional and
it is set as not implemented.
Reviewed-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20240126121636.24611-2-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
a NULL parameter is enough for a NULL MemoryRegionOps
Reviewed-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20240126120132.24248-9-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
cache_mem_ops.{read,write}() interprets opaque as
CXLComponentState(cxl_cstate) instead of ComponentRegisters(cregs).
Fortunately, cregs is the first member of cxl_cstate, so their values are
the same.
Fixes: 9e58f52d3f ("hw/cxl/component: Introduce CXL components (8.1.x, 8.2.5)")
Reviewed-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20240126120132.24248-8-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Fixes: 388d6b574e "hw/cxl: Use switch statements for read and write of cachemem registers"
Fixes: 3314efd276 "hw/cxl/mbox: Add Physical Switch Identify command."
Fixes: 004e3a93b8 "hw/cxl: Add tunneled command support to mailbox for switch cci."
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
As _Static_assert is a declaration, it can't follow a label until C23.
Some older versions of GCC trip up on this one.
This check has no obvious purpose so just remove it.
Reported-by: Jeongtae Park <jtp.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20231023140210.3089-6-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Michael Tsirkin observed that there were some unnecessarily
long lines in the CXL code in a recent review.
This patch is intended to rectify that where it does not
hurt readability.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Reviewed-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>
Message-Id: <20231023140210.3089-5-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Done to reduce line lengths where this is used.
Ext seems sufficiently obvious that it need not be spelt out
fully.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>
Message-Id: <20231023140210.3089-4-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Establishing that only register accesses of size 4 and 8 can occur
using these functions requires looking at their callers. Make it
easier to see that by using switch statements.
Assertions are used to enforce that the register storage is of the
matching size, allowing fixed values to be used for divisors of
the array indices.
Suggested-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>
Message-Id: <20231023140210.3089-3-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Support these decoders in CXL host bridges (pxb-cxl), CXL Switch USP
and CXL Type 3 end points.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20230913132523.29780-5-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
In order to avoid having the size of the per HDM decoder register block
repeated in lots of places, create the register definitions for HDM
decoder 1 and use the offset between the first registers in HDM decoder 0 and
HDM decoder 1 to establish the offset.
Calculate in each function as this is more obvious and leads to shorter
line lengths than a single #define which would need a long name
to be specific enough.
Note that the code currently only supports one decoder, so the bugs this
fixes don't actually affect anything.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20230913132523.29780-4-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
As an encoded version of these key configuration parameters is available
in a register, provide functions to extract it again so as to avoid
the need for duplicating the storage.
Whilst here update the _enc() function to include additional values
as defined in the CXL 3.0 specification. Whilst they are not
currently used in the emulation, they may be in future and it is
easier to compare with the specification if all values are covered.
Add a spec reference for cxl_interleave_ways_enc() for consistency
with the target count equivalent (and because it's nice to know where
the magic numbers come from).
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20230913132523.29780-3-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
There is no strong justification for keeping these in the header
so push them down into the associated cxl-component-utils.c file.
Suggested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20230913132523.29780-2-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
The hardware clearing the commit bit is not spec compliant.
Clearing of committed bit when commit is cleared is not specifically
stated in the CXL spec, but is the expected (and simplest) permitted
behaviour so use that for QEMU emulation.
Reviewed-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
--
v2: Picked up tags.
Message-Id: <20230421135906.3515-4-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Not a real problem yet as all supported architectures are
little endian, but continue to tidy these up when touching
code for other reasons.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20230421135906.3515-3-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Not clear what intent was here, but probably based on a misunderstanding
of what these guards are for.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20230421135906.3515-2-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
CXL uses PCI AER Internal errors to signal to the host that an error has
occurred. The host can then read more detailed status from the CXL RAS
capability.
For uncorrectable errors: support multiple injection in one operation
as this is needed to reliably test multiple header logging support in an
OS. The equivalent feature doesn't exist for correctable errors, so only
one error need be injected at a time.
Note:
- Header content needs to be manually specified in a fashion that
matches the specification for what can be in the header for each
error type.
Injection via QMP:
{ "execute": "qmp_capabilities" }
...
{ "execute": "cxl-inject-uncorrectable-errors",
"arguments": {
"path": "/machine/peripheral/cxl-pmem0",
"errors": [
{
"type": "cache-address-parity",
"header": [ 3, 4]
},
{
"type": "cache-data-parity",
"header": [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]
},
{
"type": "internal",
"header": [ 1, 2, 4]
}
]
}}
...
{ "execute": "cxl-inject-correctable-error",
"arguments": {
"path": "/machine/peripheral/cxl-pmem0",
"type": "physical"
} }
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20230302133709.30373-9-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
As these are about to be modified, fix the endian handle for
this set of registers rather than making it worse.
Note that CXL is currently only supported in QEMU on
x86 (arm64 patches out of tree) so we aren't going to yet hit
an problems with big endian. However it is good to avoid making
things worse for that support in the future.
Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20230302133709.30373-7-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>
Without being able to write these registers, no interleaving is possible.
More refined checks of HDM register state on commit to follow.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Message-Id: <20220608130804.25795-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Add a trivial handler for now to cover the root bridge
where we could do some error checking in future.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20220429144110.25167-35-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Both registers and the CFMWS entries in CDAT use simple encodings
for the number of interleave ways and the interleave granularity.
Introduce simple conversion functions to/from the unencoded
number / size. So far the iw decode has not been needed so is
it not implemented.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220429144110.25167-27-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
A CXL memory device (AKA Type 3) is a CXL component that contains some
combination of volatile and persistent memory. It also implements the
previously defined mailbox interface as well as the memory device
firmware interface.
Although the memory device is configured like a normal PCIe device, the
memory traffic is on an entirely separate bus conceptually (using the
same physical wires as PCIe, but different protocol).
Once the CXL topology is fully configure and address decoders committed,
the guest physical address for the memory device is part of a larger
window which is owned by the platform. The creation of these windows
is later in this series.
The following example will create a 256M device in a 512M window:
-object "memory-backend-file,id=cxl-mem1,share,mem-path=cxl-type3,size=512M"
-device "cxl-type3,bus=rp0,memdev=cxl-mem1,id=cxl-pmem0"
Note: Dropped PCDIMM info interfaces for now. They can be added if
appropriate at a later date.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20220429144110.25167-18-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
A CXL 2.0 component is any entity in the CXL topology. All components
have a analogous function in PCIe. Except for the CXL host bridge, all
have a PCIe config space that is accessible via the common PCIe
mechanisms. CXL components are enumerated via DVSEC fields in the
extended PCIe header space. CXL components will minimally implement some
subset of CXL.mem and CXL.cache registers defined in 8.2.5 of the CXL
2.0 specification. Two headers and a utility library are introduced to
support the minimum functionality needed to enumerate components.
The cxl_pci header manages bits associated with PCI, specifically the
DVSEC and related fields. The cxl_component.h variant has data
structures and APIs that are useful for drivers implementing any of the
CXL 2.0 components. The library takes care of making use of the DVSEC
bits and the CXL.[mem|cache] registers. Per spec, the registers are
little endian.
None of the mechanisms required to enumerate a CXL capable hostbridge
are introduced at this point.
Note that the CXL.mem and CXL.cache registers used are always 4B wide.
It's possible in the future that this constraint will not hold.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Manzanares <a.manzanares@samsung.com>
Message-Id: <20220429144110.25167-3-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
