No reason to limit buffered copy to one cluster. Let's allow up to 1
MiB.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20191022111805.3432-7-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Currently total allocation for parallel requests to block-copy instance
is unlimited. Let's limit it to 128 MiB.
For now block-copy is used only in backup, so actually we limit total
allocation for backup job.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20191022111805.3432-6-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Merge copying code into one function block_copy_do_copy, which only
calls bdrv_ io functions and don't do any synchronization (like dirty
bitmap set/reset).
Refactor block_copy() function so that it takes full decision about
size of chunk to be copied and does all the synchronization (checking
intersecting requests, set/reset dirty bitmaps).
It will help:
- introduce parallel processing of block_copy iterations: we need to
calculate chunk size, start async chunk copying and go to the next
iteration
- simplify synchronization improvement (like memory limiting in
further commit and reducing critical section (now we lock the whole
requested range, when actually we need to lock only dirty region
which we handle at the moment))
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20191022111805.3432-4-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Large copy range may imply memory allocation and large io effort, so
using 2G copy range request may be bad idea. Let's limit it to 16 MiB.
It also helps the following patch to refactor copy-with-offload
fallback to copy-with-bounce-buffer.
Note, that total memory usage of backup is still not limited, it will
be fixed in further commit.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20191022111805.3432-3-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Move bounce_buffer allocation block_copy_with_bounce_buffer. This
commit simplifies further work on implementing copying by larger chunks
(of different size) and further asynchronous handling of block_copy
iterations (with help of block/aio_task API).
Allocation works fast, a lot faster than disk io, so it's not a problem
that we now allocate/free bounce_buffer more times. And we anyway will
have to allocate several bounce_buffers for parallel execution of loop
iterations in future.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20191022111805.3432-2-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Add bs field to BdrvDirtyBitmap structure. Drop BlockDriverState
parameter from bitmap APIs where possible.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20190916141911.5255-3-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
[Rebased on top of block-copy. --js]
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Drop write notifiers and use filter node instead.
= Changes =
1. Add filter-node-name argument for backup qmp api. We have to do it
in this commit, as 257 needs to be fixed.
2. There are no more write notifiers here, so is_write_notifier
parameter is dropped from block-copy paths.
3. To sync with in-flight requests at job finish we now have drained
removing of the filter, we don't need rw-lock.
4. Block-copy is now using BdrvChildren instead of BlockBackends
5. As backup-top owns these children, we also move block-copy state
into backup-top's ownership.
= Iotest changes =
56: op-blocker doesn't shoot now, as we set it on source, but then
check on filter, when trying to start second backup.
To keep the test we instead can catch another collision: both jobs will
get 'drive0' job-id, as job-id parameter is unspecified. To prevent
interleaving with file-posix locks (as they are dependent on config)
let's use another target for second backup.
Also, it's obvious now that we'd like to drop this op-blocker at all
and add a test-case for two backups from one node (to different
destinations) actually works. But not in these series.
141: Output changed: prepatch, "Node is in use" comes from bdrv_has_blk
check inside qmp_blockdev_del. But we've dropped block-copy blk
objects, so no more blk objects on source bs (job blk is on backup-top
filter bs). New message is from op-blocker, which is the next check in
qmp_blockdev_add.
257: The test wants to emulate guest write during backup. They should
go to filter node, not to original source node, of course. Therefore we
need to specify filter node name and use it.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-id: 20191001131409.14202-6-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Split block_copy_set_callbacks out of block_copy_state_new. It's needed
for further commit: block-copy will use BdrvChildren of backup-top
filter, so it will be created from backup-top filter creation function.
But callbacks will still belong to backup job and will be set in
separate.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-id: 20191001131409.14202-4-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Move synchronization mechanism to block-copy, to be able to use one
block-copy instance from backup job and backup-top filter in parallel.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-id: 20191001131409.14202-2-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Split block_copy to separate file, to be cleanly shared with backup-top
filter driver in further commits.
It's a clean movement, the only change is drop "static" from interface
functions.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20190920142056.12778-8-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
