That is the only function that we need from exec.c, and having to
include the whole sysemu.h for this.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
---
/me leans to be less sloppy with copyright notices
thanks Dave
It turns out that it's legal to create a VM with RAMBlocks that aren't
a multiple of the pagesize in use; e.g. a 1025M main memory using
2M host pages. That breaks postcopy's atomic placement of pages,
so disallow it.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Yes, we don't have a good place to put that stuff.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
It is internal to migration, not intended for other users.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Both the ram bitmap and the unsent bitmap are split by RAMBlock.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
--
Fix compilation when DEBUG_POSTCOPY is enabled (thanks Hailiang)
It was used as a size in all cases except one.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Postcopy doesn't support migration of RAM shared with another process
yet (we've got a bunch of things to understand).
Check for the case and don't allow postcopy to be enabled.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
As an extra sanity check, make sure the region we're registering
can perform UFFDIO_COPY; the COPY will fail later but this
gives a cleaner failure.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20170224182844.32452-17-dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
We need extra Linux kernel support (~4.11) to support userfaults
on hugetlbfs; check for them.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20170224182844.32452-15-dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Allow huge pages in postcopy.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20170224182844.32452-13-dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Currently the fault address received by userfault is rounded to
the host page boundary and a host page is requested from the source.
Use the current RAMBlock page size instead of the general host page
size so that for RAMBlocks backed by huge pages we request the whole
huge page.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20170224182844.32452-11-dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
The kernel can't do UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE for huge pages, so we have
to allocate a temporary (always zero) page and use UFFDIO_COPYPAGE
on it.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20170224182844.32452-9-dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Now we deal with normal size pages and huge pages we need
to tell the place handlers the size we're dealing with
and make sure the temporary page is large enough.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20170224182844.32452-8-dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Create ram_block_discard_range in exec.c to replace
postcopy_ram_discard_range and most of ram_discard_range.
Those two routines are a bit of a weird combination, and
ram_discard_range is about to get more complex for hugepages.
It's OS dependent code (so shouldn't be in migration/ram.c) but
it needs quite a bit of the innards of RAMBlock so doesn't belong in
the os*.c.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20170224182844.32452-5-dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
At the moment postcopy will fail as soon as qemu tries to register
userfault on the RAMBlock pages that are backed by hugepages.
However, the kernel is going to get userfault support for hugepage
at some point, and we've not got the rest of the QEMU code to support
it yet, so fail neatly with an error like:
Postcopy doesn't support hugetlbfs yet (/objects/mem1)
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
mmap man page:
"On success, mmap() returns a pointer to the mapped area. On error, the
value MAP_FAILED (that is, (void *) -1) is returned, and errno is set
to indicate the cause of the error."
The check in postcopy_get_tmp_page is definitely wrong and should be
fixed.
Signed-off-by: Evgeny Yakovlev <eyakovlev@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
CC: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
CC: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1469785705-16670-1-git-send-email-den@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
qemu/osdep.h checks whether MAP_ANONYMOUS is defined, but this check
is bogus without a previous inclusion of sys/mman.h. Include it in
sysemu/os-posix.h and remove it from everywhere else.
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Remove glib.h includes, as it is provided by osdep.h.
This commit was created with scripts/clean-includes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Of the two callers, one does not use it, and the other can compute
it itself based on the other output argument (offset) and the RAMBlock.
Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
sys/eventfd.h was being guarded only by a check for linux but does
not exist on older distributions like CentOS 5. Move the include
into the code that uses it and add an appropriate guard.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Fortune <matthew.fortune@imgtec.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <6D39441BF12EF246A7ABCE6654B023536BB85DEB@hhmail02.hh.imgtec.org>
Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Rename the 'file' member of MigrationState to 'to_dst_file' to
be consistent with to_src_file, from_src_file and from_dst_file.
Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1452829066-9764-3-git-send-email-zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Clean up includes so that osdep.h is included first and headers
which it implies are not included manually.
This commit was created with scripts/clean-includes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1453832250-766-2-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
madvise() returns EINVAL in the case of many failures, but also
returns it in cases where the host kernel doesn't have THP enabled.
Postcopy only really cares that THP is off before it detects faults,
and turns it back on afterwards; so we're going to have
to assume that if the madvise fails then the host just doesn't do
THP and we can carry on with the postcopy.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Jason J. Herne <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Postcopy detects accesses to pages that haven't been transferred yet
using userfaultfd, and it causes exceptions on pages that are 'not
present'.
Ballooning also causes pages to be marked as 'not present' when the
guest inflates the balloon.
Potentially a balloon could be inflated to discard pages that are
currently inflight during postcopy and that may be arriving at about
the same time.
To avoid this confusion, disable ballooning during postcopy.
When disabled we drop balloon requests from the guest. Since ballooning
is generally initiated by the host, the management system should avoid
initiating any balloon instructions to the guest during migration,
although it's not possible to know how long it would take a guest to
process a request made prior to the start of migration.
Guest initiated ballooning will not know if it's really freed a page
of host memory or not.
Queueing the requests until after migration would be nice, but is
non-trivial, since the set of inflate/deflate requests have to
be compared with the state of the page to know what the final
outcome is allowed to be.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Userfault doesn't work with mlock; mlock is designed to nail down pages
so they don't move, userfault is designed to tell you when they're not
there.
munlock the pages we userfault protect before postcopy.
mlock everything again at the end if mlock is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Prior to servicing userfault requests we must ensure we've not got
huge pages in the area that might include non-transferred memory,
since a hugepage could incorrectly mark the whole huge page as present.
We mark the area as non-huge page (nhp) just before we perform
discards; the discard code now tells us to discard any areas
that haven't been sent (as well as any that are redirtied);
any already formed transparent-huge-pages get fragmented
by this discard process if they cotnain any discards.
Transparent huge pages that have been entirely transferred
and don't contain any discards are not broken by this mechanism;
they stay as huge pages.
By starting postcopy after a full precopy pass, many of the pages
then stay as huge pages; this is important for maintaining performance
after the end of the migration.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
userfaultfd is a Linux syscall that gives an fd that receives a stream
of notifications of accesses to pages registered with it and allows
the program to acknowledge those stalls and tell the accessing
thread to carry on.
We convert the requests from the kernel into messages back to the
source asking for the pages.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
postcopy_place_page (etc) provide a way for postcopy to place a page
into guests memory atomically (using the copy ioctl on the ufd).
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Mark the area of RAM as 'userfault'
Start up a fault-thread to handle any userfaults we might receive
from it (to be filled in later)
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Soon we'll be in either ACTIVE or POSTCOPY_ACTIVE when we
complete migration, and we need to know which we expect to be
in to change state safely.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Provide a check to see if the OS we're running on has all the bits
needed for postcopy.
Creates postcopy-ram.c which will get most of the other helpers we need.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
