Reimplement qemu_register_reset() via qemu_register_resettable().
We define a new LegacyReset object which implements Resettable and
defines its reset hold phase method to call a QEMUResetHandler
function. When qemu_register_reset() is called, we create a new
LegacyReset object and add it to the simulation_reset
ResettableContainer. When qemu_unregister_reset() is called, we find
the LegacyReset object in the container and remove it.
This implementation of qemu_unregister_reset() means we'll end up
scanning the ResetContainer's list of child objects twice, once
to find the LegacyReset object, and once in g_ptr_array_remove().
In theory we could avoid this by having the ResettableContainer
interface include a resettable_container_remove_with_equal_func()
that took a callback method so that we could use
g_ptr_array_find_with_equal_func() and g_ptr_array_remove_index().
But we don't expect qemu_unregister_reset() to be called frequently
or in hot paths, and we expect the simulation_reset container to
usually not have many children.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20240220160622.114437-9-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Implement new functions qemu_register_resettable() and
qemu_unregister_resettable(). These are intended to be
three-phase-reset aware equivalents of the old qemu_register_reset()
and qemu_unregister_reset(). Instead of passing in a function
pointer and opaque, you register any QOM object that implements the
Resettable interface.
The implementation is simple: we have a single global instance of a
ResettableContainer, which we reset in qemu_devices_reset(), and
the Resettable objects passed to qemu_register_resettable() are
added to it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20240220160622.114437-8-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Add the usual boilerplate license/copyright comment to reset.h (using
the text from reset.c), and document the existing functions.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20240220160622.114437-6-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Snapshot loading only expects to call deterministic handlers, not
non-deterministic ones. So introduce a way of registering handlers that
won't be called when reseting for snapshots.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Message-id: 20221025004327.568476-2-Jason@zx2c4.com
[PMM: updated json doc comment with Markus' text; fixed
checkpatch style nit]
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
They are small, it is not worth stubbing them. Just include them
in user-mode emulators and unit tests as well.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
