Reproducer: with
{ 'command': 'user_def_cmd4', 'returns': { 'a': 'int' } }
added to qapi-schema-test.json, qapi-commands.py dies when it tries to
generate the command handler function
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/work/armbru/qemu/scripts/qapi-commands.py", line 359, in <module>
ret = generate_command_decl(cmd['command'], arglist, ret_type) + "\n"
File "/work/armbru/qemu/scripts/qapi-commands.py", line 29, in generate_command_decl
ret_type=c_type(ret_type), name=c_name(name),
File "/work/armbru/qemu/scripts/qapi.py", line 927, in c_type
assert isinstance(value, str) and value != ""
AssertionError
because the return type doesn't exist.
Simply outlaw this usage, and drop or dumb down test cases accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
A future patch will be using a 'name':{dictionary} entry in the
QAPI schema to specify a default value for an optional argument
(see previous commit messages for more details why); but existing
use of inline nested structs conflicts with that goal. Now that
all commands have been changed to avoid inline nested structs,
nuke support for them, and turn it into a hard error. Update the
testsuite to reflect tighter parsing rules.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Demonstrate that the qapi generator silently parses confusing
types, which may cause other errors later on. Later patches
will update the expected results as the generator is made stricter.
Most of the new tests focus on blatant errors. But
returns-whitelist is a case where we have historically allowed
returning something other than a JSON object from particular
commands; we have to keep that behavior to avoid breaking clients,
but it would be nicer to avoid adding such commands in the future,
because any return that is not an (array of) object cannot be
easily extended if future qemu wants to return additional
information. The QMP protocol already documents that clients
should ignore unknown dictionary keys, but does not require
clients to have to handle more than one type of JSON object.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
