Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Cédric Le Goater
0fe43f0abf hw/arm/boot: Make write_bootloader() public as arm_write_bootloader()
The arm boot.c code includes a utility function write_bootloader()
which assists in writing a boot-code fragment into guest memory,
including handling endianness and fixing it up with entry point
addresses and similar things.  This is useful not just for the boot.c
code but also in board model code, so rename it to
arm_write_bootloader() and make it globally visible.

Since we are making it public, make its API a little neater: move the
AddressSpace* argument to be next to the hwaddr argument, and allow
the fixupcontext array to be const, since we never modify it in this
function.

Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Tested-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20230424152717.1333930-2-peter.maydell@linaro.org
[PMM: Split out from another patch by Cédric, added doc comment]
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
2023-05-02 15:47:40 +01:00
Peter Maydell
761c532ab1 target/arm: Make boards pass base address to armv7m_load_kernel()
Currently armv7m_load_kernel() takes the size of the block of memory
where it should load the initial guest image, but assumes that it
should always load it at address 0.  This happens to be true of all
our M-profile boards at the moment, but it isn't guaranteed to always
be so: M-profile CPUs can be configured (via init-svtor and
init-nsvtor, which match equivalent hardware configuration signals)
to have the initial vector table at any address, not just zero.  (For
instance the Teeny board has the boot ROM at address 0x0200_0000.)

Add a base address argument to armv7m_load_kernel(), so that
callers now pass in both base address and size. All the current
callers pass 0, so this is not a behaviour change.

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-Id: <20220823160417.3858216-3-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
2022-09-14 11:19:40 +01:00
Peter Maydell
d6dc926e6e hw/arm/boot: Drop nb_cpus field from arm_boot_info
We use the arm_boot_info::nb_cpus field in only one place, and that
place can easily get the number of CPUs locally rather than relying
on the board code to have set the field correctly.  (At least one
board, xlnx-versal-virt, does not set the field despite having more
than one CPU.)

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Niek Linnenbank <nieklinnenbank@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Tested-by: Niek Linnenbank <nieklinnenbank@gmail.com>
Message-id: 20220127154639.2090164-16-peter.maydell@linaro.org
2022-02-08 10:56:28 +00:00
Peter Maydell
d4a29ed6db hw/arm/boot: Don't write secondary boot stub if using PSCI
If we're using PSCI emulation to start secondary CPUs, there is no
point in writing the "secondary boot" stub code, because it will
never be used -- secondary CPUs start powered-off, and when powered
on are set to begin execution at the address specified by the guest's
power-on PSCI call, not at the stub.

Move the call to the hook that writes the secondary boot stub code so
that we can do it only if we're starting a Linux kernel and not using
PSCI.

(None of the users of the hook care about the ordering of its call
relative to anything else: they only use it to write a rom blob to
guest memory.)

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Niek Linnenbank <nieklinnenbank@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Tested-by: Niek Linnenbank <nieklinnenbank@gmail.com>
Message-id: 20220127154639.2090164-14-peter.maydell@linaro.org
2022-02-08 10:56:28 +00:00
Peter Maydell
817e2db8ce hw/arm/boot: Support setting psci-conduit based on guest EL
Currently we expect board code to set the psci-conduit property on
CPUs and ensure that secondary CPUs are created with the
start-powered-off property set to false, if the board wishes to use
QEMU's builtin PSCI emulation.  This worked OK for the virt board
where we first wanted to use it, because the virt board directly
creates its CPUs and is in a reasonable position to set those
properties.  For other boards which model real hardware and use a
separate SoC object, however, it is more awkward.  Most PSCI-using
boards just set the psci-conduit board unconditionally.

This was never strictly speaking correct (because you would not be
able to run EL3 guest firmware that itself provided the PSCI
interface, as the QEMU implementation would overrule it), but mostly
worked in practice because for non-PSCI SMC calls QEMU would emulate
the SMC instruction as normal (by trapping to guest EL3).  However,
we would like to make our PSCI emulation follow the part of the SMCC
specification that mandates that SMC calls with unknown function
identifiers return a failure code, which means that all SMC calls
will be handled by the PSCI code and the "emulate as normal" path
will no longer be taken.

We tried to implement that in commit 9fcd15b919
("arm: tcg: Adhere to SMCCC 1.3 section 5.2"), but this
regressed attempts to run EL3 guest code on the affected boards:
 * mcimx6ul-evk, mcimx7d-sabre, orangepi, xlnx-zcu102
 * for the case only of EL3 code loaded via -kernel (and
   not via -bios or -pflash), virt and xlnx-versal-virt
so for the 7.0 release we reverted it (in commit 4825eaae4f).

This commit provides a mechanism that boards can use to arrange that
psci-conduit is set if running guest code at a low enough EL but not
if it would be running at the same EL that the conduit implies that
the QEMU PSCI implementation is using.  (Later commits will convert
individual board models to use this mechanism.)

We do this by moving the setting of the psci-conduit and
start-powered-off properties to arm_load_kernel().  Boards which want
to potentially use emulated PSCI must set a psci_conduit field in the
arm_boot_info struct to the type of conduit they want to use (SMC or
HVC); arm_load_kernel() will then set the CPUs up accordingly if it
is not going to start the guest code at the same or higher EL as the
fake QEMU firmware would be at.

Board/SoC code which uses this mechanism should no longer set the CPU
psci-conduit property directly.  It should only set the
start-powered-off property for secondaries if EL3 guest firmware
running bare metal expects that rather than the alternative "all CPUs
start executing the firmware at once".

Note that when calculating whether we are going to run guest
code at EL3, we ignore the setting of arm_boot_info::secure_board_setup,
which might cause us to run a stub bit of guest code at EL3 which
does some board-specific setup before dropping to EL2 or EL1 to
run the guest kernel. This is OK because only one board that
enables PSCI sets secure_board_setup (the highbank board), and
the stub code it writes will behave the same way whether the
one SMC call it makes is handled by "emulate the SMC" or by
"PSCI default returns an error code". So we can leave that stub
code in place until after we've changed the PSCI default behaviour;
at that point we will remove it.

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Tested-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-id: 20220127154639.2090164-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org
2022-02-08 10:56:27 +00:00
Clement Deschamps
45c078f163 hw/arm/boot: Set NSACR.{CP11, CP10} in dummy SMC setup routine
The boot.c code usually puts the CPU into NS mode directly when it is
booting a kernel.  Since fc1120a7f5 this has included a
requirement to set NSACR to give NS state access to the FPU; we fixed
that for the usual code path in ece628fcf6.  However, it is also
possible for a board model to request an alternative mode of booting,
where its 'board_setup' code hook runs in Secure state and is
responsible for doing the S->NS transition after it has done whatever
work it must do in Secure state.  In this situation the board_setup
code now also needs to update NSACR.

This affects all boards which set info->secure_board_setup, which is
currently the 'raspi' and 'highbank' families.  They both use the
common arm_write_secure_board_setup_dummy_smc().

Set the NSACR CP11 and CP10 bits in the code written by that
function, to allow FPU access in Non-Secure state when using dummy
SMC setup routine.  Otherwise an AArch32 kernel booted on the
highbank or raspi boards will UNDEF as soon as it tries to use the
FPU.

Update the comment describing secure_board_setup to note the new
requirements on users of it.

This fixes a kernel panic when booting raspbian on raspi2.

Successfully tested with:
  2017-01-11-raspbian-jessie-lite.img
  2018-11-13-raspbian-stretch-lite.img
  2019-07-10-raspbian-buster-lite.img

Fixes: fc1120a7f5
Signed-off-by: Clement Deschamps <clement.deschamps@greensocs.com>
Tested-by: Laurent Bonnans <laurent.bonnans@here.com>
Message-id: 20191104151137.81931-1-clement.deschamps@greensocs.com
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
[PMM: updated comment to boot.h to note new requirement on
 users of secure_board_setup; edited/rewrote commit message]
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
2019-11-11 13:44:16 +00:00
Tao Xu
2744ece809 hw/arm: simplify arm_load_dtb
In struct arm_boot_info, kernel_filename, initrd_filename and
kernel_cmdline are copied from from MachineState. This patch add
MachineState as a parameter into arm_load_dtb() and move the copy chunk
of kernel_filename, initrd_filename and kernel_cmdline into
arm_load_kernel().

Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Jingqi <jingqi.liu@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Tao Xu <tao3.xu@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20190809065731.9097-2-tao3.xu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Acked-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Acked-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
[ehabkost: include hw/boards.h again to fix build failures]
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
2019-09-03 11:26:55 -03:00
Markus Armbruster
d484205210 Include exec/memory.h slightly less
Drop unnecessary inclusions from headers.  Downgrade a few more to
exec/hwaddr.h.

Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190812052359.30071-17-armbru@redhat.com>
2019-08-16 13:31:52 +02:00
Markus Armbruster
64552b6be4 Include hw/irq.h a lot less
In my "build everything" tree, changing hw/irq.h triggers a recompile
of some 5400 out of 6600 objects (not counting tests and objects that
don't depend on qemu/osdep.h).

hw/hw.h supposedly includes it for convenience.  Several other headers
include it just to get qemu_irq and.or qemu_irq_handler.

Move the qemu_irq and qemu_irq_handler typedefs from hw/irq.h to
qemu/typedefs.h, and then include hw/irq.h only where it's still
needed.  Touching it now recompiles only some 500 objects.

Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190812052359.30071-13-armbru@redhat.com>
2019-08-16 13:31:52 +02:00
Peter Maydell
12ec8bd51e arm: Rename hw/arm/arm.h to hw/arm/boot.h
The header file hw/arm/arm.h now includes only declarations
relating to hw/arm/boot.c functionality. Rename it accordingly,
and adjust its header comment.

The bulk of this commit was created via
 perl -pi -e 's|hw/arm/arm.h|hw/arm/boot.h|' hw/arm/*.c include/hw/arm/*.h

In a few cases we can just delete the #include:
hw/arm/msf2-soc.c, include/hw/arm/aspeed_soc.h and
include/hw/arm/bcm2836.h did not require it.

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20190516163857.6430-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org
2019-05-23 14:47:43 +01:00