Markus Armbruster
|
b45c03f585
|
arm: Use g_new() & friends where that makes obvious sense
g_new(T, n) is neater than g_malloc(sizeof(T) * n). It's also safer,
for two reasons. One, it catches multiplication overflowing size_t.
Two, it returns T * rather than void *, which lets the compiler catch
more type errors.
This commit only touches allocations with size arguments of the form
sizeof(T).
Coccinelle semantic patch:
@@
type T;
@@
-g_malloc(sizeof(T))
+g_new(T, 1)
@@
type T;
@@
-g_try_malloc(sizeof(T))
+g_try_new(T, 1)
@@
type T;
@@
-g_malloc0(sizeof(T))
+g_new0(T, 1)
@@
type T;
@@
-g_try_malloc0(sizeof(T))
+g_try_new0(T, 1)
@@
type T;
expression n;
@@
-g_malloc(sizeof(T) * (n))
+g_new(T, n)
@@
type T;
expression n;
@@
-g_try_malloc(sizeof(T) * (n))
+g_try_new(T, n)
@@
type T;
expression n;
@@
-g_malloc0(sizeof(T) * (n))
+g_new0(T, n)
@@
type T;
expression n;
@@
-g_try_malloc0(sizeof(T) * (n))
+g_try_new0(T, n)
@@
type T;
expression p, n;
@@
-g_realloc(p, sizeof(T) * (n))
+g_renew(T, p, n)
@@
type T;
expression p, n;
@@
-g_try_realloc(p, sizeof(T) * (n))
+g_try_renew(T, p, n)
@@
type T;
expression n;
@@
-(T *)g_new(T, n)
+g_new(T, n)
@@
type T;
expression n;
@@
-(T *)g_new0(T, n)
+g_new0(T, n)
@@
type T;
expression p, n;
@@
-(T *)g_renew(T, p, n)
+g_renew(T, p, n)
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-id: 1440524394-15640-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
|
2015-09-07 10:39:27 +01:00 |
|