According to PoP, both 32- and 64-bit shifts use lowest 6 address
bits. The current code special-cases 32-bit shifts to use only 5 bits,
which is not correct. For example, shifting by 32 bits currently
preserves the initial value, however, it's supposed zero it out
instead.
Fix by merging sh32 and sh64 and adapting CC calculation to shift
values greater than 31.
Fixes: cbe24bfa91 ("target-s390: Convert SHIFT, ROTATE SINGLE")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220112165016.226996-5-iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
For s390x, the only unaligned accesses that are signaled are atomic,
and we don't actually want to raise SIGBUS for those, but instead
raise a SPECIFICATION error, which the kernel will report as SIGILL.
Split out a do_unaligned_access function to share between the user-only
s390x_cpu_record_sigbus and the sysemu s390x_do_unaligned_access.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Move the masking of the address from cpu_loop into
s390_cpu_record_sigsegv -- this is governed by hw, not linux.
This does mean we have to raise our own exception, rather
than return to the fallback.
Use maperr to choose between PGM_PROTECTION and PGM_ADDRESSING.
Use the appropriate si_code for each in cpu_loop.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
While we may have had some thought of allowing system-mode
to return from this hook, we have no guests that require this.
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Let's move address validation into mmu_translate() and
mmu_translate_real(). This allows for checking whether an absolute
address is valid before looking up the storage key. We can now get rid of
the ram_size check.
Interestingly, we're already handling LOAD REAL ADDRESS wrong, because
a) We're not supposed to touch storage keys
b) We're not supposed to convert to an absolute address
Let's use a fake, negative MMUAccessType to teach mmu_translate() to
fix that handling and to not perform address validation.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210903155514.44772-8-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Let's replace the ram_size check by a proper physical address space
check (for example, to prepare for memory hotplug), trigger addressing
exceptions and trace the return value of the storage key getter/setter.
Provide an helper mmu_absolute_addr_valid() to be used in other context
soon. Always test for "read" instead of "write" as we are not actually
modifying the page itself.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210903155514.44772-5-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
split sysemu part of cpu models,
also create a tiny _user.c with just the (at least for now),
empty implementation of apply_cpu_model.
Signed-off-by: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Cho, Yu-Chen <acho@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210707105324.23400-15-acho@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
The internal.h file is renamed to s390x-internal.h, because of the
risk of collision with other files with the same name.
Signed-off-by: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Cho, Yu-Chen <acho@suse.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210707105324.23400-7-acho@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
