The AioContext lock no longer exists.
There is one noteworthy change:
- * More specifically, these functions use BDRV_POLL_WHILE(bs), which
- * requires the caller to be either in the main thread and hold
- * the BlockdriverState (bs) AioContext lock, or directly in the
- * home thread that runs the bs AioContext. Calling them from
- * another thread in another AioContext would cause deadlocks.
+ * More specifically, these functions use BDRV_POLL_WHILE(bs), which requires
+ * the caller to be either in the main thread or directly in the home thread
+ * that runs the bs AioContext. Calling them from another thread in another
+ * AioContext would cause deadlocks.
I am not sure whether deadlocks are still possible. Maybe they have just
moved to the fine-grained locks that have replaced the AioContext. Since
I am not sure if the deadlocks are gone, I have kept the substance
unchanged and just removed mention of the AioContext.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231205182011.1976568-15-stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Delete these functions because nothing calls these functions anymore.
I introduced these APIs in commit 98563fc3ec ("aio: add
aio_context_acquire() and aio_context_release()") in 2014. It's with a
sigh of relief that I delete these APIs almost 10 years later.
Thanks to Paolo Bonzini's vision for multi-queue QEMU, we got an
understanding of where the code needed to go in order to remove the
limitations that the original dataplane and the IOThread/AioContext
approach that followed it.
Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito had the splendid determination to convert
large parts of the codebase so that they no longer needed the AioContext
lock. This was a painstaking process, both in the actual code changes
required and the iterations of code review that Emanuele eked out of
Kevin and me over many months.
Kevin Wolf tackled multitudes of graph locking conversions to protect
in-flight I/O from run-time changes to the block graph as well as the
clang Thread Safety Analysis annotations that allow the compiler to
check whether the graph lock is being used correctly.
And me, well, I'm just here to add some pizzazz to the QEMU multi-queue
block layer :). Thank you to everyone who helped with this effort,
including Eric Blake, code reviewer extraordinaire, and others who I've
forgotten to mention.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231205182011.1976568-11-stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Now that the AioContext lock no longer exists, AIO_WAIT_WHILE() and
AIO_WAIT_WHILE_UNLOCKED() are equivalent.
A future patch will get rid of AIO_WAIT_WHILE_UNLOCKED().
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231205182011.1976568-10-stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
The bdrv_co_lock() and bdrv_co_unlock() functions are already no-ops.
Remove them.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231205182011.1976568-8-stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This is the big patch that removes
aio_context_acquire()/aio_context_release() from the block layer and
affected block layer users.
There isn't a clean way to split this patch and the reviewers are likely
the same group of people, so I decided to do it in one patch.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>
Message-ID: <20231205182011.1976568-7-stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Stop acquiring/releasing the AioContext lock in
bdrv_graph_wrlock()/bdrv_graph_unlock() since the lock no longer has any
effect.
The distinction between bdrv_graph_wrunlock() and
bdrv_graph_wrunlock_ctx() becomes meaningless and they can be collapsed
into one function.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231205182011.1976568-6-stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_graph_wrunlock() calls aio_poll(), which may run callbacks that
have a nested event loop. Nested event loops can depend on other
iothreads making progress, so in order to allow them to make progress it
must not hold the AioContext lock of another thread while calling
aio_poll().
This introduces a @bs parameter to bdrv_graph_wrunlock() whose
AioContext is temporarily dropped (which matches bdrv_graph_wrlock()),
and a bdrv_graph_wrunlock_ctx() that can be used if the BlockDriverState
doesn't necessarily exist any more when unlocking.
This also requires a change to bdrv_schedule_unref(), which was relying
on the incorrectly taken lock. It needs to take the lock itself now.
While this is a separate bug, it can't be fixed a separate patch because
otherwise the intermediate state would either deadlock or try to release
a lock that we don't even hold.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231115172012.112727-3-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
[kwolf: Fixed up bdrv_schedule_unref()]
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Fixes: bc4e68d362 "hw/ufs: Initial commit for emulated Universal-Flash-Storage"
Reviewed-by: Jeuk Kim <jeuk20.kim@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Almost all functions that access bs->file already take the graph
lock now. Add locking to the remaining users and finally annotate the
struct field itself as protected by the graph lock.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-25-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK to some driver callbacks that are already called
with the graph lock held, and which will need the annotation because
they access bs->file, but don't have it yet.
This also covers a few callbacks that were not marked GRAPH_RDLOCK
before, but where updating BlockDriver is trivially possible.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-21-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_change_backing_file() is called both inside and outside coroutine
context. This makes it difficult for it to take the graph lock
internally. It also means that driver implementations need to be able to
run outside of coroutines, too. Switch it to the usual model with a
coroutine based implementation and a co_wrapper instead. The new
function is marked GRAPH_RDLOCK.
As the co_wrapper now runs the function in the AioContext of the node
(as it should always have done), this is not GLOBAL_STATE_CODE() any
more.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-20-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Almost all functions that access bs->backing already take the graph
lock now. Add locking to the remaining users and finally annotate the
struct field itself as protected by the graph lock.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-18-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_replace_node(). Its callers may already want
to hold the graph lock and so wouldn't be able to call functions that
take it internally.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-17-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_set_backing_hd_drained(). Basically everthing
in the function needs the lock and its callers may already want to hold
the graph lock and so wouldn't be able to call functions that take it
internally.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-14-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_cow_child() need to hold a reader lock for the graph because it
accesses bs->backing.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-13-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_filter_child() need to hold a reader lock for the graph because it
accesses bs->file/backing.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-12-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_chain_contains() need to hold a reader lock for the graph because
it calls bdrv_filter_or_cow_bs(), which accesses bs->file/backing.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-11-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_(un)freeze_backing_chain() need to hold a reader lock for the
graph because it calls bdrv_filter_or_cow_child(), which accesses
bs->file/backing.
Use the opportunity to make bdrv_is_backing_chain_frozen() static, it
has no external callers.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-10-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_skip_filters() need to hold a reader lock for the graph because it
calls bdrv_filter_child(), which accesses bs->file/backing.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-9-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_skip_implicit_filters() need to hold a reader lock for the graph
because it calls bdrv_filter_child(), which accesses bs->file/backing.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-8-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_filter_or_cow_bs() need to hold a reader lock for the graph because
it calls bdrv_filter_or_cow_child(), which accesses bs->file/backing.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-7-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling block_job_add_bdrv(). These callers will typically
already hold the graph lock once the locking work is completed, which
means that they can't call functions that take it internally.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-6-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_root_attach_child(). These callers will
typically already hold the graph lock once the locking work is
completed, which means that they can't call functions that take it
internally.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-5-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_filter_bs() need to hold a reader lock for the graph because
it calls bdrv_filter_child(), which accesses bs->file/backing.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-4-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_has_zero_init() need to hold a reader lock for the graph because
it calls bdrv_filter_bs(), which accesses bs->file/backing.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-3-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_probe_blocksizes() need to hold a reader lock for the graph because
it calls bdrv_filter_bs(), which accesses bs->file/backing.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <20231031135431.393137-9-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
which will allow changing job-type-specific options after job
creation.
In the JobVerbTable, the same allow bits as for set-speed are used,
because set-speed can be considered an existing change command.
Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-ID: <20231031135431.393137-2-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This patch removes the code that ufs-lu was duplicating from
scsi-hd and allows them to share code.
It makes ufs-lu have a virtual scsi-bus and scsi-hd internally.
This allows scsi related commands to be passed thorugh to the scsi-hd.
The query request and nop command work the same as the existing logic.
Well-known lus do not have a virtual scsi-bus and scsi-hd, and
handle the necessary scsi commands by emulating them directly.
Signed-off-by: Jeuk Kim <jeuk20.kim@samsung.com>
This patch fixes invalid ufs register fields.
This fixes an issue reported by Bin Meng that
caused ufs to fail over riscv.
Fixes: bc4e68d362 ("hw/ufs: Initial commit for emulated Universal-Flash-Storage")
Signed-off-by: Jeuk Kim <jeuk20.kim@samsung.com>
Reported-by: Bin Meng <bmeng@tinylab.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng@tinylab.org>
Tested-by: Bin Meng <bmeng@tinylab.org>
bdrv_graph_wrlock() can't run in a coroutine (because it polls) and
requires holding the BQL. We already have GLOBAL_STATE_CODE() to assert
the latter. Assert the former as well and add a no_coroutine_fn marker.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-23-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Almost all functions that access the child links already take the graph
lock now. Add locking to the remaining users and finally annotate the
struct field itself as protected by the graph lock.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-22-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Almost all functions that access the parent link already take the graph
lock now. Add locking to the remaining user in a test case and finally
annotate the struct field itself as protected by the graph lock.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-21-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_get_specific_info() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
This removes an assume_graph_lock() call in vmdk's implementation.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-20-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_apply_auto_read_only() need to hold a reader lock for the graph
because it calls bdrv_can_set_read_only(), which indirectly accesses the
parents list of a node.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-19-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_op_is_blocked() need to hold a reader lock for the graph
because it calls bdrv_get_device_or_node_name(), which accesses the
parents list of a node.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-18-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
qcow2_signal_corruption() need to hold a reader lock for the graph
because it calls bdrv_get_node_name(), which accesses the parents list
of a node.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-15-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_amend_options() need to hold a reader lock for the graph. This
removes an assume_graph_lock() call in crypto's implementation.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-14-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_get_parent_name() need to hold a reader lock for the graph
because it accesses the parents list of a node.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-13-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_primary_child() need to hold a reader lock for the graph
because it accesses the children list of a node.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-12-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_refresh_filename() need to hold a reader lock for the graph
because it accesses the children list of a node.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-11-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_get_xdbg_block_graph() need to hold a reader lock for the graph
because it accesses the children list of a node.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-10-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reopen isn't easy with respect to locking because many of its functions
need to iterate the graph, some change it, and then you get some drains
in the middle where you can't hold any locks.
Therefore just documents most of the functions to be unlocked, and take
locks internally before accessing the graph.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-9-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_snapshot_fallback() need to hold a reader lock for the graph
because it accesses the children list of a node.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-8-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Draining recursively traverses the graph, therefore we need to make sure
that also such accesses to the graph are protected by the graph rdlock.
There are 3 different drain callers to consider:
1. drain in the main loop: no issue at all, rdlock is nop.
2. drain in an iothread: rdlock only works in main loop or coroutines,
so disallow it.
3. drain in a coroutine (regardless of AioContext): the drain mechanism
takes care of scheduling a BH in the bs->aio_context that will
then take care of perform the actual draining. This is wrong,
because as pointed in (2) if bs->aio_context is an iothread then
rdlock won't work. Therefore change bdrv_co_yield_to_drain to
schedule the BH in the main loop.
Caller (2) also implies that we need to modify test-bdrv-drain.c to
disallow draining in the iothreads.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-6-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_first_blk() and bdrv_is_root_node() need to hold a reader lock
for the graph. These functions are the only functions in block-backend.c
that access the parent list of a node.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-5-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Add a new wrapper type for GRAPH_RDLOCK functions that should be called
from coroutine context.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-3-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230904100306.156197-4-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Include both coroutine and non-coroutine versions, the latter being
co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_rdlock of the former.
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230904100306.156197-3-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
