The double-colon synax is rST formatting that precedes a literal code
block. We do not want to capture these as QAPI-specific sections.
Coerce blocks that start with e.g. "Example::" to be parsed as untagged
paragraphs instead of special tagged sections.
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20240626222128.406106-14-jsnow@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
[Indentation tweaked for consistency]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
We do not need a dedicated section for notes. By eliminating a specially
parsed section, these notes can be treated as normal rST paragraphs in
the new QMP reference manual, and can be placed and styled much more
flexibly.
Convert all existing "Note" and "Notes" sections to pure rST. As part of
the conversion, capitalize the first letter of each sentence and add
trailing punctuation where appropriate to ensure notes look sensible and
consistent in rendered HTML documentation. Markup is also re-aligned to
the de-facto standard of 3 spaces for directives.
Update docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.rst to reflect the new paradigm, and
update the QAPI parser to prohibit "Note" sections while suggesting a
new syntax. The exact formatting to use is a matter of taste, but a good
candidate is simply:
.. note:: lorem ipsum ...
... dolor sit amet ...
... consectetur adipiscing elit ...
... but there are other choices, too. The Sphinx readthedocs theme
offers theming for the following forms (capitalization unimportant); all
are adorned with a (!) symbol () in the title bar for rendered HTML
docs.
See
https://sphinx-rtd-theme.readthedocs.io/en/stable/demo/demo.html#admonitions
for examples of each directive/admonition in use.
These are rendered in orange:
.. Attention:: ...
.. Caution:: ...
.. WARNING:: ...
These are rendered in red:
.. DANGER:: ...
.. Error:: ...
These are rendered in green:
.. Hint:: ...
.. Important:: ...
.. Tip:: ...
These are rendered in blue:
.. Note:: ...
.. admonition:: custom title
admonition body text
This patch uses ".. note::" almost everywhere, with just two "caution"
directives. Several instances of "Notes:" have been converted to
merely ".. note::", or multiple ".. note::" where appropriate.
".. admonition:: notes" is used in a few places where we had an
ordered list of multiple notes that would not make sense as
standalone/separate admonitions. Two "Note:" following "Example:"
have been turned into ordinary paragraphs within the example.
NOTE: Because qapidoc.py does not attempt to preserve source ordering of
sections, the conversion of Notes from a "tagged section" to an
"untagged section" means that rendering order for some notes *may
change* as a result of this patch. The forthcoming qapidoc.py rewrite
strictly preserves source ordering in the rendered documentation, so
this issue will be rectified in the new generator.
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> [for block*.json]
Message-ID: <20240626222128.406106-11-jsnow@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
[Commit message clarified slightly, period added to one more note]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
We use section "Returns" for documenting both success and error
response of commands.
I intend to generate better command success response documentation.
Easier when "Returns" documents just he success response.
Create new section tag "Errors". The next two commits will move error
response documentation from "Returns" sections to "Errors" sections.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20240227113921.236097-4-armbru@redhat.com>
The test compares Sphinx plain-text output against a golden reference.
To work on Windows hosts, it filters out carriage returns in both
files. Unfortunately, the filter doesn't work: it creates an empty
file. Comparing empty files always succeeds.
Fix the filter, and update the golden reference to current Sphinx
output.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20240216145841.2099240-2-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
This is quite similar to commit 84ab008687 "qapi: Add feature flags to
struct members", only for enums instead of structs.
Special feature flag 'deprecated' is silently ignored there. This is
okay only because it will be implemented shortly.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20211025042405.3762351-3-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Drop tests that are specifically about simple unions:
* SugaredUnion in doc-good: flat unions are covered by @Object.
* union-branch-case and union-clash-branches: branch naming for flat
unions is enforced for the tag enum instead, which is covered by
enum-member-case and enum-clash-member.
* union-empty: empty flat unions are covered by flat-union-empty.
Rewrite the remainder to use flat unions: args-union, bad-base,
flat-union-base-union, union-branch-invalid-dict, union-unknown.
Except drop union-optional-branch. because converting this one is not
worth the trouble; we don't explicitly check names beginning with '*'
in other places, either.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210917143134.412106-21-armbru@redhat.com>
Commit 6cc2e4817f "qapi: introduce QAPISchemaIfCond.cgen()" caused a
minor regression: redundant parenthesis. Subsequent commits
eliminated of many of them, but not all. Get rid of the rest now.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210831123809.1107782-8-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
The C code generated for 'if' conditionals is incorrectly
parenthesized. For instance,
'if': { 'not': { 'any': [ { 'not': 'TEST_IF_EVT' },
{ 'not': 'TEST_IF_STRUCT' } ] } } }
generates
#if !(!defined(TEST_IF_EVT)) || (!defined(TEST_IF_STRUCT))
This is wrong. Correct would be:
#if !(!defined(TEST_IF_EVT) || !defined(TEST_IF_STRUCT))
Cover the issue in qapi-schema-test.json. This generates bad #if in
tests/test-qapi-events.h and other files.
Add a similar condition to doc-good.json. The generated documentation
is fine.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210831123809.1107782-5-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Change the 'if' condition strings to be C-agnostic. It will accept
'[A-Z][A-Z0-9_]*' identifiers. This allows to express configuration
conditions in other languages (Rust or Python for ex) or other more
suitable forms.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Tested-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210804083105.97531-11-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
[Rebased with semantic conflict in redefined-event.json]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
For the sake of completeness, introduce the 'not' condition.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210804083105.97531-10-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
[Long line broken in tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.json]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Replace the simple list sugar form with a recursive structure that will
accept other operators in the following commits (all, any or not).
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210804083105.97531-7-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
[Accidental code motion undone. Degenerate :forms: comment dropped.
Helper _check_if() moved. Error messages tweaked. ui.json updated.
Accidental changes to qapi-schema-test.json dropped.]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Event names should be ALL_CAPS with words separated by underscore.
Enforce this. The only offenders are in tests/. Fix them. Existing
test event-case covers the new error.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210323094025.3569441-14-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Add a test of the rST output from the QAPI doc-comment generator,
similar to what we currently have that tests the Texinfo output.
This is a bit more awkward with Sphinx, because the generated output
is not 100% under our control the way the QAPI-to-Texinfo generator
was. We can't observe the data we generate, only the Sphinx
output. Two issues.
One, the output can vary with the Sphinx version. In practice Sphinx's
plaintext output generation has been identical between at least Sphinx
1.6 and 3.0, so we use that. (The HTML output has had changes across
versions). We use an exact-match comparison check, with the
understanding that perhaps changes in a future Sphinx version might
require us to implement something more clever to cope with variation
in the output.
Two, the test can only protect us from changes in the data we generate
that are visible in plain text.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200925162316.21205-16-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
[Commit message improved]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
