The Cortex-M CPU and its NVIC are two intimately intertwined parts of
the same hardware; it is not possible to use one without the other.
Unfortunately a lot of our board models don't do any sanity checking
on the CPU type the user asks for, so a command line like
qemu-system-arm -M versatilepb -cpu cortex-m3
will create an M3 without an NVIC, and coredump immediately.
In the other direction, trying a non-M-profile CPU in an M-profile
board won't blow up, but doesn't do anything useful either:
qemu-system-arm -M lm3s6965evb -cpu arm926
Add some checking in the NVIC and CPU realize functions that the
user isn't trying to use an NVIC without an M-profile CPU or
an M-profile CPU without an NVIC, so we can produce a helpful
error message rather than a core dump.
Fixes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1766896
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 20180601160355.15393-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In many of the NVIC registers relating to interrupts, we
have to convert from a byte offset within a register set
into the number of the first interrupt which is affected.
We were getting this wrong for:
* reads of NVIC_ISPR<n>, NVIC_ISER<n>, NVIC_ICPR<n>, NVIC_ICER<n>,
NVIC_IABR<n> -- in all these cases we were missing the "* 8"
needed to convert from the byte offset to the interrupt number
(since all these registers use one bit per interrupt)
* writes of NVIC_IPR<n> had the opposite problem of a spurious
"* 8" (since these registers use one byte per interrupt)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 20180209165810.6668-9-peter.maydell@linaro.org
We were previously making the system control register (SCR)
just RAZ/WI. Although we don't implement the functionality
this register controls, we should at least provide the state,
including the banked state for v8M.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180209165810.6668-7-peter.maydell@linaro.org
M profile cores have a similar setup for cache ID registers
to A profile:
* Cache Level ID Register (CLIDR) is a fixed value
* Cache Type Register (CTR) is a fixed value
* Cache Size ID Registers (CCSIDR) are a bank of registers;
which one you see is selected by the Cache Size Selection
Register (CSSELR)
The only difference is that they're in the NVIC memory mapped
register space rather than being coprocessor registers.
Implement the M profile view of them.
Since neither Cortex-M3 nor Cortex-M4 implement caches,
we don't need to update their init functions and can leave
the ctr/clidr/ccsidr[] fields in their ARMCPU structs at zero.
Newer cores (like the Cortex-M33) will want to be able to
set these ID registers to non-zero values, though.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180209165810.6668-6-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The Coprocessor Power Control Register (CPPWR) is new in v8M.
It allows software to control whether coprocessors are allowed
to power down and lose their state. QEMU doesn't have any
notion of power control, so we choose the IMPDEF option of
making the whole register RAZ/WI (indicating that no coprocessors
can ever power down and lose state).
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180209165810.6668-5-peter.maydell@linaro.org
For M profile cores, cache maintenance operations are done by
writing to special registers in the system register space.
For QEMU, cache operations are always NOPs, since we don't
implement the cache. Implementing these explicitly avoids
a spurious LOG_GUEST_ERROR when the guest uses them.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180209165810.6668-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The PENDNMISET/CLR bits in the ICSR should be RAZ/WI from
NonSecure state if the AIRCR.BFHFNMINS bit is zero. We had
misimplemented this as making the bits RAZ/WI from both
Secure and NonSecure states. Fix this bug by checking
attrs.secure so that Secure code can pend and unpend NMIs.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180209165810.6668-3-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Instead of hardcoding the values of M profile ID registers in the
NVIC, use the fields in the CPU struct. This will allow us to
give different M profile CPU types different ID register values.
This commit includes the addition of the missing ID_ISAR5,
which exists as RES0 in both v7M and v8M.
(The values of the ID registers might be wrong for the M4 --
this commit leaves the behaviour there unchanged.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180209165810.6668-2-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Currently armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq() does three things:
* make the current highest priority pending interrupt active
* return a bool indicating whether that interrupt is targeting
Secure or NonSecure state
* implicitly tell the caller which is the highest priority
pending interrupt by setting env->v7m.exception
We need to split these jobs, because v7m_exception_taken()
needs to know whether the pending interrupt targets Secure so
it can choose to stack callee-saves registers or not, but it
must not make the interrupt active until after it has done
that stacking, in case the stacking causes a derived exception.
Similarly, it needs to know the number of the pending interrupt
so it can read the correct vector table entry before the
interrupt is made active, because vector table reads might
also cause a derived exception.
Create a new armv7m_nvic_get_pending_irq_info() function which simply
returns information about the highest priority pending interrupt, and
use it to rearrange the v7m_exception_taken() code so we don't
acknowledge the exception until we've done all the things which could
possibly cause a derived exception.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 1517324542-6607-3-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In order to support derived exceptions (exceptions generated in
the course of trying to take an exception), we need to be able
to handle prioritizing whether to take the original exception
or the derived exception.
We do this by introducing a new function
armv7m_nvic_set_pending_derived() which the exception-taking code in
helper.c will call when a derived exception occurs. Derived
exceptions are dealt with mostly like normal pending exceptions, so
we share the implementation with the armv7m_nvic_set_pending()
function.
Note that the way we structure this is significantly different
from the v8M Arm ARM pseudocode: that does all the prioritization
logic in the DerivedLateArrival() function, whereas we choose to
let the existing "identify highest priority exception" logic
do the prioritization for us. The effect is the same, though.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1517324542-6607-2-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The Configurable Fault Status Register for ARMv7M and v8M is
supposed to be byte and halfword accessible, but we were only
implementing word accesses. Add support for the other access
sizes, which are used by the Zephyr RTOS.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reported-by: Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 1512742372-31517-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
For the v8M security extension, there should be two systick
devices, which use separate banked systick exceptions. The
register interface is banked in the same way as for other
banked registers, including the existence of an NS alias
region for secure code to access the nonsecure timer.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 1512154296-5652-3-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Generalize nvic_sysreg_ns_ops so that we can pass it an
arbitrary MemoryRegion which it will use as the underlying
register implementation to apply the NS-alias behaviour
to. We'll want this so we can do the same with systick.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 1512154296-5652-2-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Fix an incorrect mask expression in the handling of v7M MPU_RBAR
reads that meant that we would always report the ADDR field as zero.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1509732813-22957-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
This calculation of the first exception vector in
the ITNS<n> register being accessed:
int startvec = 32 * (offset - 0x380) + NVIC_FIRST_IRQ;
is incorrect, because offset is in bytes, so we only want
to multiply by 8.
Spotted by Coverity (CID 1381484, CID 1381488), though it is
not correct that it actually overflows the buffer, because
we have a 'startvec + i < s->num_irq' guard.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1507650856-11718-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Coverity points out that we forgot the 'break' for
the SAU_CTRL write case (CID1381683). This has
no actual visible consequences because it happens
that the following case is effectively a no-op.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 1507742676-9908-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
When we added support for the new SHCSR bits in v8M in commit
437d59c17e the code to support writing to the new HARDFAULTPENDED
bit was accidentally only added for non-secure writes; the
secure banked version of the bit should also be writable.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1506092407-26985-21-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Implement the register interface for the SAU: SAU_CTRL,
SAU_TYPE, SAU_RNR, SAU_RBAR and SAU_RLAR. None of the
actual behaviour is implemented here; registers just
read back as written.
When the CPU definition for Cortex-M33 is eventually
added, its initfn will set cpu->sau_sregion, in the same
way that we currently set cpu->pmsav7_dregion for the
M3 and M4.
Number of SAU regions is typically a configurable
CPU parameter, but this patch doesn't provide a
QEMU CPU property for it. We can easily add one when
we have a board that requires it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1506092407-26985-14-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Add the new M profile Secure Fault Status Register
and Secure Fault Address Register.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1506092407-26985-10-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In the v7M architecture, there is an invariant that if the CPU is
in Handler mode then the CONTROL.SPSEL bit cannot be nonzero.
This in turn means that the current stack pointer is always
indicated by CONTROL.SPSEL, even though Handler mode always uses
the Main stack pointer.
In v8M, this invariant is removed, and CONTROL.SPSEL may now
be nonzero in Handler mode (though Handler mode still always
uses the Main stack pointer). In preparation for this change,
change how we handle this bit: rename switch_v7m_sp() to
the now more accurate write_v7m_control_spsel(), and make it
check both the handler mode state and the SPSEL bit.
Note that this implicitly changes the point at which we switch
active SP on exception exit from before we pop the exception
frame to after it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1506092407-26985-4-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Reset for devices does not include an automatic clear of the
device state (unlike CPU state, where most of the state
structure is cleared to zero). Add some missing initialization
of NVIC state that meant that the device was left in the wrong
state if the guest did a warm reset.
(In particular, since we were resetting the computed state like
s->exception_prio but not all the state it was computed
from like s->vectors[x].active, the NVIC wound up in an
inconsistent state that could later trigger assertion failures.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 1506092407-26985-2-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Update armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq() and armv7m_nvic_complete_irq()
to handle banked exceptions:
* acknowledge needs to use the correct vector, which may be
in sec_vectors[]
* acknowledge needs to return to its caller whether the
exception should be taken to secure or non-secure state
* complete needs its caller to tell it whether the exception
being completed is a secure one or not
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-20-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Handle banking of SHCSR: some register bits are banked between
Secure and Non-Secure, and some are only accessible to Secure.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-19-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The ICSR NVIC register is banked for v8M. This doesn't
require any new state, but it does mean that some bits
are controlled by BFHNFNMINS and some bits must work
with the correct banked exception. There is also a new
in v8M PENDNMICLR bit.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-18-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Now that we have a banked FAULTMASK register and banked exceptions,
we can implement the correct check in cpu_mmu_index() for whether
the MPU_CTRL.HFNMIENA bit's effect should apply. This bit causes
handlers which have requested a negative execution priority to run
with the MPU disabled. In v8M the test has to check this for the
current security state and so takes account of banking.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-17-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Update nvic_exec_prio() to support the v8M changes:
* BASEPRI, FAULTMASK and PRIMASK are all banked
* AIRCR.PRIS can affect NS priorities
* AIRCR.BFHFNMINS affects FAULTMASK behaviour
These changes mean that it's no longer possible to
definitely say that if FAULTMASK is set it overrides
PRIMASK, and if PRIMASK is set it overrides BASEPRI
(since if PRIMASK_NS is set and AIRCR.PRIS is set then
whether that 0x80 priority should take effect or the
priority in BASEPRI_S depends on the value of BASEPRI_S,
for instance). So we switch to the same approach used
by the pseudocode of working through BASEPRI, PRIMASK
and FAULTMASK and overriding the previous values if
needed.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-16-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
If AIRCR.BFHFNMINS is clear, then although NonSecure HardFault
can still be pended via SHCSR.HARDFAULTPENDED it mustn't actually
preempt execution. The simple way to achieve this is to clear the
enable bit for it, since the enable bit isn't guest visible.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-15-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In v7M, the fixed-priority exceptions are:
Reset: -3
NMI: -2
HardFault: -1
In v8M, this changes because Secure HardFault may need
to be prioritised above NMI:
Reset: -4
Secure HardFault if AIRCR.BFHFNMINS == 1: -3
NMI: -2
Secure HardFault if AIRCR.BFHFNMINS == 0: -1
NonSecure HardFault: -1
Make these changes, including support for changing the
priority of Secure HardFault as AIRCR.BFHFNMINS changes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-14-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
When escalating to HardFault, we must go into Lockup if we
can't take the synchronous HardFault because the current
execution priority is already at or below the priority of
HardFault. In v7M HF is always priority -1 so a simple < 0
comparison sufficed; in v8M the priority of HardFault can
vary depending on whether it is a Secure or NonSecure
HardFault, so we must check against the priority of the
HardFault exception vector we're about to use.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-13-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In armv7m_nvic_set_pending() we have to compare the
priority of an exception against the execution priority
to decide whether it needs to be escalated to HardFault.
In the specification this is a comparison against the
exception's group priority; for v7M we implemented it
as a comparison against the raw exception priority
because the two comparisons will always give the
same answer. For v8M the existence of AIRCR.PRIS and
the possibility of different PRIGROUP values for secure
and nonsecure exceptions means we need to explicitly
calculate the vector's group priority for this check.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-12-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make the set_prio() function take a bool indicating
whether to pend the secure or non-secure version of a banked
interrupt, and use this to implement the correct banking
semantics for the SHPR registers.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-11-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make the armv7m_nvic_set_pending() and armv7m_nvic_clear_pending()
functions take a bool indicating whether to pend the secure
or non-secure version of a banked interrupt, and update the
callsites accordingly.
In most callsites we can simply pass the correct security
state in; in a couple of cases we use TODO comments to indicate
that we will return the code in a subsequent commit.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-10-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Update the nvic_recompute_state() code to handle the security
extension and its associated banked registers.
Code that uses the resulting cached state (ie the irq
acknowledge and complete code) will be updated in a later
commit.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-9-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
For v8M, the NVIC has a new set of registers per interrupt,
NVIC_ITNS<n>. These determine whether the interrupt targets Secure
or Non-secure state. Implement the register read/write code for
these, and make them cause NVIC_IABR, NVIC_ICER, NVIC_ISER,
NVIC_ICPR, NVIC_IPR and NVIC_ISPR to RAZ/WI for non-secure
accesses to fields corresponding to interrupts which are
configured to target secure state.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-8-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Update the code in nvic_rettobase() so that it checks the
sec_vectors[] array as well as the vectors[] array if needed.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-7-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The Application Interrupt and Reset Control Register has some changes
for v8M:
* new bits SYSRESETREQS, BFHFNMINS and PRIS: these all have
real state if the security extension is implemented and otherwise
are constant
* the PRIGROUP field is banked between security states
* non-secure code can be blocked from using the SYSRESET bit
to reset the system if SYSRESETREQS is set
Implement the new state and the changes to register read and write.
For the moment we ignore the effects of the secure PRIGROUP.
We will implement the effects of PRIS and BFHFNMIS later.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-6-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Instead of looking up the pending priority
in nvic_pending_prio(), cache it in a new state struct
field. The calculation of the pending priority given
the interrupt number is more complicated in v8M with
the security extension, so the caching will be worthwhile.
This changes nvic_pending_prio() from returning a full
(group + subpriority) priority value to returning a group
priority. This doesn't require changes to its callsites
because we use it only in comparisons of the form
execution_prio > nvic_pending_prio()
and execution priority is always a group priority, so
a test (exec prio > full prio) is true if and only if
(execprio > group_prio).
(Architecturally the expected comparison is with the
group priority for this sort of "would we preempt" test;
we were only doing a test with a full priority as an
optimisation to avoid the mask, which is possible
precisely because the two comparisons always give the
same answer.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-5-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
With banked exceptions, just the exception number in
s->vectpending is no longer sufficient to uniquely identify
the pending exception. Add a vectpending_is_s_banked bool
which is true if the exception is using the sec_vectors[]
array.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-4-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
For the v8M security extension, some exceptions must be banked
between security states. Add the new vecinfo array which holds
the state for the banked exceptions and migrate it if the
CPU the NVIC is attached to implements the security extension.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
In several places we were unconditionally applying the
nvic_gprio_mask() to a priority value. This is incorrect
if the priority is one of the fixed negative priority
values (for NMI and HardFault), so don't do it.
This bug would have caused both NMI and HardFault to be
considered as the same priority and so NMI wouldn't
correctly preempt HardFault.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505137930-13255-5-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make the CFSR register banked if v8M security extensions are enabled.
Not all the bits in this register are banked: the BFSR
bits [15:8] are shared between S and NS, and we store them
in the NS copy of the register.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1503414539-28762-19-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make the MMFAR register banked if v8M security extensions are
enabled.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1503414539-28762-18-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make the CCR register banked if v8M security extensions are enabled.
This is slightly more complicated than the other "add banking"
patches because there is one bit in the register which is not
banked. We keep the live data in the NS copy of the register,
and adjust it on register reads and writes. (Since we don't
currently implement the behaviour that the bit controls, there
is nowhere else that needs to care.)
This patch includes the enforcement of the bits which are newly
RES1 in ARMv8M.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1503414539-28762-17-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make the MPU_CTRL register banked if v8M security extensions are
enabled.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1503414539-28762-16-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make the MPU_RNR register banked if v8M security extensions are
enabled.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1503414539-28762-15-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make the MPU registers MPU_MAIR0 and MPU_MAIR1 banked if v8M security
extensions are enabled.
We can freely add more items to vmstate_m_security without
breaking migration compatibility, because no CPU currently
has the ARM_FEATURE_M_SECURITY bit enabled and so this
subsection is not yet used by anything.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1503414539-28762-14-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make the MPU registers MPU_MAIR0 and MPU_MAIR1 banked if v8M security
extensions are enabled.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1503414539-28762-13-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make the VTOR register banked if v8M security extensions are enabled.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1503414539-28762-12-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
For v8M the range 0xe002e000..0xe002efff is an alias region which
for secure accesses behaves like a NonSecure access to the main
SCS region. (For nonsecure accesses including when the security
extension is not implemented, it is RAZ/WI.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1503414539-28762-11-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make the FAULTMASK register banked if v8M security extensions are enabled.
Note that we do not yet implement the functionality of the new
AIRCR.PRIS bit (which allows the effect of the NS copy of FAULTMASK to
be restricted).
This patch includes the code to determine for v8M which copy
of FAULTMASK should be updated on exception exit; further
changes will be required to the exception exit code in general
to support v8M, so this is just a small piece of that.
The v8M ARM ARM introduces a notation where individual paragraphs
are labelled with R (for rule) or I (for information) followed
by a random group of subscript letters. In comments where we want
to refer to a particular part of the manual we use this convention,
which should be more stable across document revisions than using
section or page numbers.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1503414539-28762-9-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
