Older QEMU versions did fixup the ram size to match what can be reported
via sclp. We need to mimic this behaviour for machine types 4.2 and
older to not fail on inbound migration for memory sizes that do not fit.
Old machines with proper aligned memory sizes are not affected.
Alignment table:
VM size (<=) | Alignment
--------------------------
1020M | 1M
2040M | 2M
4080M | 4M
8160M | 8M
16320M | 16M
32640M | 32M
65280M | 64M
130560M | 128M
261120M | 256M
522240M | 512M
1044480M | 1G
2088960M | 2G
4177920M | 4G
8355840M | 8G
Suggested action is to replace unaligned -m value with a suitable
aligned one or if a change to a newer machine type is possible, use a
machine version >= 5.0.
A future version might remove the compatibility handling.
For machine types >= 5.0 we can simply use an increment size of 1M and
use the full range of increment number which allows for all possible
memory sizes. The old limitation of having a maximum of 1020 increments
was added for standby memory, which we no longer support. With that we
can now support even weird memory sizes like 10001234 MB.
As we no longer fixup maxram_size as well, make other users use ram_size
instead. Keep using maxram_size when setting the maximum ram size in KVM,
as that will come in handy in the future when supporting memory hotplug
(in contrast, storage keys and storage attributes for hotplugged memory
will have to be migrated per RAM block in the future).
Fixes: 3a12fc61af ("390x/s390-virtio-ccw: use memdev for RAM")
Reported-by: Lukáš Doktor <ldoktor@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200401123754.109602-1-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
[CH: fixed up message on memory size fixup]
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
The macro CMMA_BLOCK_SIZE was defined but not used, and a hardcoded
value was instead used in the code.
This patch fixes the value of CMMA_BLOCK_SIZE and uses it in the
appropriate place in the code, and fixes another case of hardcoded
value in the KVM backend, replacing it with the more appropriate
constant KVM_S390_CMMA_SIZE_MAX.
Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <1530787170-3101-1-git-send-email-imbrenda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Fix storage attribute migration so that it does not fail for guests
with more than a few GB of RAM.
With such guests, the index in the buffer would go out of bounds,
usually by large amounts, thus receiving -EFAULT from the kernel.
Migration itself would be successful, but storage attributes would then
not be migrated completely.
This patch fixes the out of bounds access, and thus migration of all
storage attributes when the guest have large amounts of memory.
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Fixes: 903fd80b03 ("s390x/migration: Storage attributes device")
Message-Id: <1516297904-18188-1-git-send-email-imbrenda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
The storage attribute devices are only meant to be instantiated one
time, internally. They can not be used by the user, so mark them with
user_creatable = false.
Suggested-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1503576029-24264-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Let's do it just like the other architectures. Introduce kvm-stub.c
for stubs and kvm_s390x.h for the declarations.
Change license to GPL2+ and keep copyright notice.
As we are dropping the sysemu/kvm.h include from cpu.h, fix up includes.
Suggested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20170818114353.13455-18-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Storage attributes device, like we have for storage keys.
Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
