Devices may have component devices and buses.
Device realization may fail. Realization is recursive: a device's
realize() method realizes its components, and device_set_realized()
realizes its buses (which should in turn realize the devices on that
bus, except bus_set_realized() doesn't implement that, yet).
When realization of a component or bus fails, we need to roll back:
unrealize everything we realized so far. If any of these unrealizes
failed, the device would be left in an inconsistent state. Must not
happen.
device_set_realized() lets it happen: it ignores errors in the roll
back code starting at label child_realize_fail.
Since realization is recursive, unrealization must be recursive, too.
But how could a partly failed unrealize be rolled back? We'd have to
re-realize, which can fail. This design is fundamentally broken.
device_set_realized() does not roll back at all. Instead, it keeps
unrealizing, ignoring further errors.
It can screw up even for a device with no buses: if the lone
dc->unrealize() fails, it still unregisters vmstate, and calls
listeners' unrealize() callback.
bus_set_realized() does not roll back either. Instead, it stops
unrealizing.
Fortunately, no unrealize method can fail, as we'll see below.
To fix the design error, drop parameter @errp from all the unrealize
methods.
Any unrealize method that uses @errp now needs an update. This leads
us to unrealize() methods that can fail. Merely passing it to another
unrealize method cannot cause failure, though. Here are the ones that
do other things with @errp:
* virtio_serial_device_unrealize()
Fails when qbus_set_hotplug_handler() fails, but still does all the
other work. On failure, the device would stay realized with its
resources completely gone. Oops. Can't happen, because
qbus_set_hotplug_handler() can't actually fail here. Pass
&error_abort to qbus_set_hotplug_handler() instead.
* hw/ppc/spapr_drc.c's unrealize()
Fails when object_property_del() fails, but all the other work is
already done. On failure, the device would stay realized with its
vmstate registration gone. Oops. Can't happen, because
object_property_del() can't actually fail here. Pass &error_abort
to object_property_del() instead.
* spapr_phb_unrealize()
Fails and bails out when remove_drcs() fails, but other work is
already done. On failure, the device would stay realized with some
of its resources gone. Oops. remove_drcs() fails only when
chassis_from_bus()'s object_property_get_uint() fails, and it can't
here. Pass &error_abort to remove_drcs() instead.
Therefore, no unrealize method can fail before this patch.
device_set_realized()'s recursive unrealization via bus uses
object_property_set_bool(). Can't drop @errp there, so pass
&error_abort.
We similarly unrealize with object_property_set_bool() elsewhere,
always ignoring errors. Pass &error_abort instead.
Several unrealize methods no longer handle errors from other unrealize
methods: virtio_9p_device_unrealize(),
virtio_input_device_unrealize(), scsi_qdev_unrealize(), ...
Much of the deleted error handling looks wrong anyway.
One unrealize methods no longer ignore such errors:
usb_ehci_pci_exit().
Several realize methods no longer ignore errors when rolling back:
v9fs_device_realize_common(), pci_qdev_unrealize(),
spapr_phb_realize(), usb_qdev_realize(), vfio_ccw_realize(),
virtio_device_realize().
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200505152926.18877-17-armbru@redhat.com>
use the new virtio_delete_queue function to cleanup.
Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan <pannengyuan@huawei.com>
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200225075554.10835-3-pannengyuan@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Similar to other virtio device(https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11399237/), virtio queues forgot to delete in unrealize, and aslo error path in realize, this patch fix these memleaks, the leak stack is as follow:
Direct leak of 57344 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7f15784fb970 in __interceptor_calloc (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0xef970)
#1 0x7f157790849d in g_malloc0 (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x5249d)
#2 0x55587a1bf859 in virtio_add_queue /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:2333
#3 0x55587a2071d5 in vuf_device_realize /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/hw/virtio/vhost-user-fs.c:212
#4 0x55587a1ae360 in virtio_device_realize /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:3531
#5 0x55587a63fb7b in device_set_realized /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/hw/core/qdev.c:891
#6 0x55587acf03f5 in property_set_bool /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/qom/object.c:2238
#7 0x55587acfce0d in object_property_set_qobject /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/qom/qom-qobject.c:26
#8 0x55587acf5c8c in object_property_set_bool /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/qom/object.c:1390
#9 0x55587a8e22a2 in pci_qdev_realize /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/hw/pci/pci.c:2095
#10 0x55587a63fb7b in device_set_realized /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/hw/core/qdev.c:891
#11 0x55587acf03f5 in property_set_bool /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/qom/object.c:2238
#12 0x55587acfce0d in object_property_set_qobject /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/qom/qom-qobject.c:26
#13 0x55587acf5c8c in object_property_set_bool /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/qom/object.c:1390
#14 0x55587a496d65 in qdev_device_add /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/qdev-monitor.c:679
Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan <pannengyuan@huawei.com>
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200225075554.10835-2-pannengyuan@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
The property doesn't make much sense for a vhost-user device.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20191116112016.14872-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
The virtio-fs virtio device provides shared file system access using
the FUSE protocol carried over virtio.
The actual file server is implemented in an external vhost-user-fs device
backend process.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190930105135.27244-3-dgilbert@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
