bdrv_can_store_new_dirty_bitmap and bdrv_remove_persistent_dirty_bitmap
check if they are running in a coroutine, directly calling the
coroutine callback if it's the case.
Except that no coroutine calls such functions, therefore that check
can be removed, and function creation can be offloaded to
c_w.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20221128142337.657646-15-eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This new annotation starts just a function wrapper that creates
a new coroutine. It assumes the caller is not a coroutine.
It will be the default annotation to be used in the future.
This is much better as c_w_mixed, because it is clear if the caller
is a coroutine or not, and provides the advantage of automating
the code creation. In the future all c_w_mixed functions will be
substituted by co_wrapper.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20221128142337.657646-11-eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
In preparation to the incoming new function specifiers,
rename g_c_w with a more meaningful name and document it.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20221128142337.657646-10-eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Make the informal rules formal. In further commit we'll add
corresponding assertions.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220726201134.924743-8-vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Block drivers may optimize I/O requests accessing buffers previously
registered with bdrv_register_buf(). Checking whether all elements of a
request's QEMUIOVector are within previously registered buffers is
expensive, so we need a hint from the user to avoid costly checks.
Add a BDRV_REQ_REGISTERED_BUF request flag to indicate that all
QEMUIOVector elements in an I/O request are known to be within
previously registered buffers.
Always pass the flag through to driver read/write functions. There is
little harm in passing the flag to a driver that does not use it.
Passing the flag to drivers avoids changes across many block drivers.
Filter drivers would need to explicitly support the flag and pass
through to their children when the children support it. That's a lot of
code changes and it's hard to remember to do that everywhere, leading to
silent reduced performance when the flag is accidentally dropped.
The only problematic scenario with the approach in this patch is when a
driver passes the flag through to internal I/O requests that don't use
the same I/O buffer. In that case the hint may be set when it should
actually be clear. This is a rare case though so the risk is low.
Some drivers have assert(!flags), which no longer works when
BDRV_REQ_REGISTERED_BUF is passed in. These assertions aren't very
useful anyway since the functions are called almost exclusively by
bdrv_driver_preadv/pwritev() so if we get flags handling right there
then the assertion is not needed.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20221013185908.1297568-7-stefanha@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
There is a bug in handling BDRV_REQ_NO_WAIT flag: we still may wait in
wait_serialising_requests() if request is unaligned. And this is
possible for the only user of this flag (preallocate filter) if
underlying file is unaligned to its request_alignment on start.
So, we have to fix preallocate filter to do only aligned preallocate
requests.
Next, we should fix generic block/io.c somehow. Keeping in mind that
preallocate is the only user of BDRV_REQ_NO_WAIT and that we have to
fix its behavior now, it seems more safe to just assert that we never
use BDRV_REQ_NO_WAIT with unaligned requests and add corresponding
comment. Let's do so.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Message-Id: <20220215121609.38570-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
[hreitz: Rebased on block GS/IO split]
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
block.h currently contains a mix of functions:
some of them run under the BQL and modify the block layer graph,
others are instead thread-safe and perform I/O in iothreads.
Some others can only be called by either the main loop or the
iothread running the AioContext (and not other iothreads),
and using them in another thread would cause deadlocks, and therefore
it is not ideal to define them as I/O.
It is not easy to understand which function is part of which
group (I/O vs GS vs "I/O or GS"), and this patch aims to clarify it.
The "GS" functions need the BQL, and often use
aio_context_acquire/release and/or drain to be sure they
can modify the graph safely.
The I/O function are instead thread safe, and can run in
any AioContext.
"I/O or GS" functions run instead in the main loop or in
a single iothread, and use BDRV_POLL_WHILE().
By splitting the header in two files, block-io.h
and block-global-state.h we have a clearer view on what
needs what kind of protection. block-common.h
contains common structures shared by both headers.
block.h is left there for legacy and to avoid changing
all includes in all c files that use the block APIs.
Assertions are added in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220303151616.325444-4-eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
