When pc-sysfw.rom_only == 0, flash memory will be
usable with kvm. In order to enable flash memory mode,
a pflash device must be created. (For example, by
using the -pflash command line parameter.)
Usage of a flash memory device with kvm requires
KVM_CAP_READONLY_MEM, and kvm will abort if
a flash device is used with an older kvm which does
not support this capability.
If a flash device is not used, then qemu/kvm will
operate in the original rom-mode.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-id: 1369816047-16384-5-git-send-email-jordan.l.justen@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
The isapc machine with seabios currently requires the BIOS region
to be read/write memory rather than read-only memory.
KVM currently cannot support the BIOS as a ROM region, but qemu
in non-KVM mode can. Based on this, isapc machine currently only
works with KVM.
To work-around this isapc issue, this change avoids marking the
BIOS as readonly for isapc.
This change also will allow KVM to start supporting ROM mode
via KVM_CAP_READONLY_MEM.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-id: 1369816047-16384-2-git-send-email-jordan.l.justen@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
"Readable" is a very unfortunate name for this flag because even a
rom_device region will always be readable from the guest POV. What
differs is the mapping, just like the comments had to explain already.
Also, readable could currently be understood as being a generic region
flag, but it only applies to rom_device regions.
So rename the flag and the function to modify it after the original term
"ROMD" which could also be interpreted as "ROM direct", i.e. ROM mode
with direct access. In any case, the scope of the flag is clearer now.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This reverts commit 9953f8822c.
While Markus's analysis is entirely correct, there are 1.6 patches
that fix the bug for real and without requiring machine type hacks.
Let's think of the children who will have to read this code, and
avoid a complicated mess of semantics that differ between <1.5,
1.5, and >1.5.
Conflicts:
hw/i386/pc_piix.c
hw/i386/pc_q35.c
include/hw/i386/pc.h
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Message-id: 1368189483-7915-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Add new devices for various manufacturers, and re-sort Spansion list to
match the order in Linux, which requires chips with a non-zero extended ID
to come first.
With this commit the outstanding differences to Linux rev 55bf75b are:
- Erase size flag differences in s25sl032p, s25sl064p, s25fl016k, s25fl064k
(These devices have only some blocks that support small erase sizes.)
- Linux lacks n25q128
- Devices without a Jedec ID have been excluded
Signed-off-by: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Introduce type constant and cast macro to obsolete DO_UPCAST().
Reuse type constant for PC machine compatibility settings.
Prepares for ISA realizefn.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
Message-id: 1367093935-29091-4-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de
Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Use of a flash memory device for the BIOS was added in series "[PATCH
v10 0/8] PC system flash support", commit 4732dca..1b89faf, v1.1.
Flash vs. ROM is a guest-visible difference. Thus, flash use had to
be suppressed for machine types pc-1.0 and older. This was
accomplished by adding a dummy device "pc-sysfw" with property
"rom_only":
* Non-zero rom_only means "use ROM". Default for pc-1.0 and older.
* Zero rom_only means "maybe use flash". Default for newer machines.
Not only is the dummy device ugly, it was also retroactively added to
the older machine types! Fortunately, it's not guest-visible (thus no
immediate guest ABI breakage), and has no vmstate (thus no immediate
migration breakage). Breakage occurs only if the user unwisely
enables flash by setting rom_only to zero. Patch review FAIL #1.
Why "maybe use flash"? Flash didn't (and still doesn't) work with
KVM. Therefore, rom_only=0 really means "use flash, except when KVM
is enabled, use ROM". This is a Bad Idea, because it makes enabling/
disabling KVM guest-visible. Patch review FAIL #2.
Aside: it also precludes migrating between KVM on and off, but that's
not possible for other reasons anyway.
Fix as follows:
1. Change the meaning of rom_only=0 to mean "use flash, no ifs, buts,
or maybes" for pc-i440fx-1.5 and pc-q35-1.5. Don't change anything
for older machines (to remain bug-compatible).
2. Change the default value from 0 to 1 for these machines.
Necessary, because 0 doesn't work with KVM. Once it does, we can flip
the default back to 0.
3. Don't revert the retroactive addition of device "pc-sysfw" to older
machine types. Seems not worth the trouble.
4. Add a TODO comment asking for device "pc-sysfw" to be dropped once
flash works with KVM.
Net effect is that you get a BIOS ROM again even when KVM is disabled,
just like for machines predating the introduction of flash.
To get flash instead, use "--global pc-sysfw.rom_only=0".
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-id: 1365780303-26398-4-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
This clean the init and the exit functions and rename virtio_common_cleanup
to virtio_cleanup.
Signed-off-by: KONRAD Frederic <fred.konrad@greensocs.com>
Message-id: 1366791683-5350-7-git-send-email-fred.konrad@greensocs.com
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
This remove virtio-bindings, and use class instead.
Signed-off-by: KONRAD Frederic <fred.konrad@greensocs.com>
Message-id: 1366791683-5350-6-git-send-email-fred.konrad@greensocs.com
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
This remove the function pointer in VirtIODevice, and use only
VirtioDeviceClass function pointer.
Signed-off-by: KONRAD Frederic <fred.konrad@greensocs.com>
Message-id: 1366791683-5350-5-git-send-email-fred.konrad@greensocs.com
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Drop all the infrastructure for taddr properties (ie ones which
are 'hwaddr' sized). These are now unused, and any further desired
use would be rather questionable since device properties shouldn't
generally depend on a type that is conceptually variable based on
the target CPU. 32 or 64 bit integer properties should be used instead
as appropriate for the specific device.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
I think in the early revisions of this we had an instantiation helper
for the device in devices.h. This was later removed and this header was
left over. Removed
Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
If there is no backing bdrv, let the debugging developer know about it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>
The debug printfs on every page program/read is extremely verbose. Add
a second level of debug for this.
Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>
Some of the debug printfs in m25p80 are really guest errors.
Changed over to qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>
Some dodgy casts were making a mess of these msgs.
Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>
The recent rearrangement of include files had some minor errors:
devices.h is not ARM specific and should not be in arm/
arm.h should be in arm/
Move these two headers to correct this.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Minor fixes to documentation and code comments.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
