PHB5 will introduce its own root port model. Prepare ground for it.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220117122753.1655504-3-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The root port device is currently created and attached to the PHB
early in pnv_phb4_realize(). Do it under pnv_pec_default_phb_realize()
after the PHB is fully realized. It's cleaner and avoids an extra
test on defaults_enabled().
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220117122753.1655504-2-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This function does not use 'stack' anymore. Rename it to
pnv_pec_phb_update_map().
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220114180719.52117-9-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
All the complexity that was scattered between PnvPhb4PecStack and
PnvPHB4 are now centered in the PnvPHB4 device. PnvPhb4PecStack does not
serve any purpose in the current code base.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220114180719.52117-8-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This patch changes the design of the PEC device to create and realize PHB4s
instead of PecStacks. After all the recent changes, PHB4s now contain all
the information needed for their proper functioning, not relying on PecStack
in any capacity.
All changes are being made in a single patch to avoid renaming parts of
the PecState and leaving the code in a strange way. E.g. rename
PecClass->num_stacks to num_phbs, which would then read a
pnv_pec_num_stacks[] array. To avoid mixing the old and new design more
than necessary it's clearer to do these changes in a single step.
The name changes made are:
- in PnvPhb4PecState:
* rename 'num_stacks' to 'num_phbs'
* remove the pec->stacks[] array. Current code relies on the
pec->stacks[] obj acting as a simple container, without ever accessing
pec->stacks[] for any other purpose. Instead of converting this into a
pec->phbs[] array, remove it
- in PnvPhb4PecClass, rename *num_stacks to *num_phbs;
- pnv_pec_num_stacks[] is renamed to pnv_pec_num_phbs[].
The logical changes:
- pnv_pec_default_phb_realize():
* init and set the properties of the PnvPHB4 qdev
* do not use stack->phb anymore;
- pnv_pec_realize():
* use the new default_phb_realize() to init/realize each PHB if
running with defaults;
- pnv_pec_instance_init(): removed since we're creating the PHBs during
pec_realize();
- pnv_phb4_get_stack():
* renamed to pnv_phb4_get_pec() and returns a PnvPhb4PecState*;
- pnv_phb4_realize(): use 'phb->pec' instead of 'stack'.
This design change shouldn't caused any behavioral change in the runtime
of the machine.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220114180719.52117-7-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
pnv_pec_default_phb_realize() stopped using it after the previous patch and
no one else is using it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220114180719.52117-6-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Move the current pnv_pec_stk_default_phb_realize() call to
pec_realize(), renaming the function to pnv_pec_default_phb_realize(),
and set the PHB attributes using the PEC object directly.
This will be important to allow for PECs devices to handle PHB4s
directly later on.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220114180719.52117-5-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This pointer was being used for two reasons: pnv_phb4_update_regions()
was using it to access the PHB and phb4_realize() was using it as a way
to determine if the PHB was user created.
We can determine if the PHB is user created via phb->pec, introduced in
the previous patch, and pnv_phb4_update_regions() is no longer using
stack->phb.
Remove the pointer from the PnvPHB4 device.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220114180719.52117-4-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
'stack->stack_no' represents the order that a stack appears in its PEC.
Its primary use is in XSCOM address space calculation in
pnv_phb4_xscom_realize() when calculating the memory region offset.
This attribute is redundant with phb->phb_id, which is calculated via
pnv_phb4_pec_get_phb_id() using stack->stack_no information. It'll also
be awkward to assign it when dealing with PECs and PHBs only in a future
patch.
A new pnv_phb4_get_phb_stack_no() helper is introduced to eliminate most
of the stack->stack_no uses we have. The only use left after this patch
is during pnv_pec_stk_default_phb_realize() when calculating phb_id,
which will also handled in the next patches.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220114180719.52117-3-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This property will track the owner PEC of this PHB. For now it's
redundant since we can retrieve the PEC via phb->stack->pec but it
will not be redundant when we get rid of the stack device.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220114180719.52117-2-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
After recent changes, this MemoryRegion can be migrated to PnvPHB4
without too much trouble.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220113192952.911188-11-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
We're now able to cleanly move nest_regs_mr to the PnvPHB4 device.
One thing of notice here is the need to use a phb->stack->pec pointer
because pnv_pec_stk_nest_xscom_write requires a PEC object. Another
thing that can be noticed in the use of 'stack->stack_no' that still
remains throughout the XSCOM code.
After moving all MemoryRegions to the PnvPHB4 object, this illustrates
what is the remaining role of the stack: provide a PEC pointer and the
'stack_no' information. If we can provide these in the PnvPHB4 object
instead (spoiler: we can, and we will), the PnvPhb4PecStack device will
be deprecated and can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220113192952.911188-10-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
stack->nest_regs_mr wasn't migrated to PnvPHB4 together with phb->nest_regs[] in
the previous patch. We were unable to cleanly convert its write MemoryRegionOps,
pnv_pec_stk_nest_xscom_write(), to use PnvPHB4 instead of PnvPhb4PecStack due to
pnv_pec_stk_update_map() using a stack. Thing is, we're now able to convert
pnv_pec_stk_update_map() because of what the did in previous patch.
The need for this intermediate step is a good example of the interconnected
relationship between stack and phb that we aim to cleanup.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220113192952.911188-9-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
stack->nest_regs[] is used in several XSCOM functions and it's one of
the main culprits of having to deal with stack->phb pointers around the
code.
Sure, we're having to add 2 extra stack->phb pointers to ease
nest_regs[] migration to PnvPHB4. They'll be dealt with shortly.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220113192952.911188-8-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
These 2 MemoryRegions, together with mmio(0|1)_base and mmio(0|1)_size
variables, are used together in the same functions. We're better of
moving them all in a single step.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220113192952.911188-7-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The function does not rely on stack for anything it does anymore. This
is also one less instance of 'stack->phb' that we need to worry about.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220113192952.911188-6-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This MemoryRegion can also be moved in a single step.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220113192952.911188-5-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This MemoryRegion is simple enough to be moved in a single step.
A 'stack->phb' pointer had to be introduced in pnv_pec_stk_update_map()
because this function isn't ready to be fully converted to use a PnvPHB4
pointer instead. This will be dealt with in the following patches.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220113192952.911188-4-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Previous patch changed pnv_pec_stk_pci_xscom_read() and
pnv_pec_stk_pci_xscom_write() to use a PnvPHB4 opaque, making it easier
to move both pci_regs[] and the pci_regs_mr MemoryRegion to the PnvHB4
object.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220113192952.911188-3-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The current relationship between PnvPhb4PecStack and PnvPHB4 objects is
overly complex. Recent work done in pnv_phb4.c and pnv_phb4_pec.c shows
that the stack obj role in the overall design is more of a placeholder for
its 'phb' object, having no atributes that stand on its own. This became
clearer after pnv-phb4 user creatable devices were implemented.
What remains now are a lot of stack->phb and phb->stack pointers
throughout .read and .write callbacks of MemoryRegionOps that are being
initialized in phb4_realize() time. stk_realize() is a no-op if the
machine is being run with -nodefaults.
The first step of trying to decouple the stack and phb relationship is
to move the MemoryRegionOps that belongs to PnvPhb4PecStack to PhbPHB4.
Unfortunately this can't be done without some preliminary steps to
change the usage of 'stack' and replace it with 'phb' in these
read/write callbacks.
This patch starts this process by using a PnvPHB4 opaque in
pnv_pec_stk_pci_xscom_ops instead of PnvPhb4PecStack.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220113192952.911188-2-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
pnv_pec_stk_pci_xscom_write() is pnv_pec_stk_pci_xscom_ops write
callback. It writes values into regs in the stack->nest_regs[] array.
The pnv_pec_stk_pci_xscom_read read callback, on the other hand, returns
values of the stack->pci_regs[]. In fact, at this moment, the only use
of stack->pci_regs[] is in pnv_pec_stk_pci_xscom_read(). There's no code
that is written anything in stack->pci_regs[], which is suspicious.
Considering that stack->nest_regs[] is widely used by the nested
MemoryOps pnv_pec_stk_nest_xscom_ops, in both read and write callbacks,
the conclusion is that we're writing the wrong array in
pnv_pec_stk_pci_xscom_write(). This function should write stack->pci_regs[]
instead.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220111200132.633896-2-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Its only callers are inside pnv_phb4.c.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220111131027.599784-6-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This patch introduces pnv-phb4 user creatable devices that are created
in a similar manner as pnv-phb3 devices, allowing the user to interact
with the PHBs directly instead of creating PCI Express Controllers that
will create a certain amount of PHBs per controller index.
We accomplish this by doing the following:
- add a pnv_phb4_get_stack() helper to retrieve which stack an user
created phb4 would occupy;
- when dealing with an user created pnv-phb4 (detected by checking if
phb->stack is NULL at the start of phb4_realize()), retrieve its stack
and initialize its properties as done in stk_realize();
- use 'defaults_enabled()' in stk_realize() to avoid creating and
initializing a 'stack->phb' qdev that might be overwritten by an user
created pnv-phb4 device. This process is wrapped into a new helper
called pnv_pec_stk_default_phb_realize().
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220111131027.599784-5-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
At this moment, stack->phb is the plain PnvPHB4 device itself instead of
a pointer to the device. This will present a problem when adding user
creatable devices because we can't deal with this struct and the
realize() callback from the user creatable device.
We can't get rid of this attribute, similar to what we did when enabling
pnv-phb3 user creatable devices, because pnv_phb4_update_regions() needs
to access stack->phb to do its job. This function is called twice in
pnv_pec_stk_update_map(), which is one of the nested xscom write
callbacks (via pnv_pec_stk_nest_xscom_write()). In fact,
pnv_pec_stk_update_map() code comment is explicit about how the order of
the unmap/map operations relates with the PHB subregions.
All of this indicates that this code is tied together in a way that we
either go on a crusade, featuring lots of refactories and redesign and
considerable pain, to decouple stack and phb mapping, or we allow stack
update_map operations to access the associated PHB as it is today even
after introducing pnv-phb4 user devices.
This patch chooses the latter. Instead of getting rid of stack->phb,
turn it into a PHB pointer. This will allow us to assign an user created
PHB to an existing stack later. In this process,
pnv_pec_stk_instance_init() is removed because stack->phb is being
initialized in stk_realize() instead.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220111131027.599784-4-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The 'stack->phb_regs_mr' PHB4 passthrough XSCOM initialization relies on
'stack->phb' being not NULL. Moving 'stack->phb_regs_mr' region_init()
and add_subregion() to phb4_realize() time is a natural thing to do
since it's strictly PHB related.
The remaining XSCOM initialization is also related to 'stack->phb' but
in a different manner. For instance, 'stack->nest_regs_mr'
MemoryRegionOps, 'pnv_pec_stk_nest_xscom_ops', uses
pnv_pec_stk_nest_xscom_write() as a write callback. When trying to write
the PEC_NEST_STK_BAR_EN reg, pnv_pec_stk_update_map() is called. Inside
this function, pnv_phb4_update_regions() is called twice. This function
uses 'stack->phb' to manipulate memory regions of the phb.
This is not a problem now but, when enabling user creatable phb4s, a
stack that doesn't have an associated phb (i.e. stack->phb = NULL) it
will cause a SIGINT during boot in pnv_phb4_update_regions().
All this can be avoided if all XSCOM realize is moved to phb4_realize(),
when we have certainty about the existence of 'stack->phb'. A lot of
code was moved from pnv_phb4_pec.c to pnv_phb4.c due to static constant
and variables being used but the cleaner logic is worth the trouble.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220111131027.599784-3-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Moving all phb4 properties setup to stk_realize() keeps this logic in
a single place instead of having it scattered between stk_realize() and
pec_realize().
'phb->index' can be retrieved using stack->stack_no and
pnv_phb4_pec_get_phb_id(), deprecating the use of 'phb-id' alias that
was being used for this purpose in pec_realize().
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220111131027.599784-2-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Relying on stack->phb to write the xscom DT of the PEC is something that
we won't be able to do with user creatable pnv-phb4 devices.
Hopefully, this can be done by using pnv_phb4_pec_get_phb_id(), which is
already used by pnv_pec_realize() to set the phb-id of the stack. Use
the same idea in pnv_pec_dt_xscom() to write ibm,phb-index without the
need to accessing stack->phb, since stack->phb is not granted to be !=
NULL when user creatable phbs are introduced.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220110143346.455901-4-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The logic inside pnv_pec_phb_offset() will be useful in the next patch
to determine the stack that should contain a PHB4 device.
Move the function to pnv_phb4.c and make it public since there's no
pnv_phb4_pec.h header. While we're at it, add 'stack_index' as a
parameter and make the function return 'phb-id' directly. And rename it
to pnv_phb4_pec_get_phb_id() to be even clearer about the function
intent.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220110143346.455901-3-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
PHB3s ared SysBus devices and should be allowed to be dynamically
created.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220105212338.49899-9-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The powernv machine uses the object hierarchy to populate the device
tree and each device should be parented to the chip it belongs to.
This is not the case for user created devices which are parented to
the container "/unattached".
Make sure a PHB3 device is parented to its chip by reparenting the
object if necessary.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220105212338.49899-8-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
PHB3 devices and PCI devices can now be added to the powernv8 machine
using :
-device pnv-phb3,chip-id=0,index=1 \
-device nec-usb-xhci,bus=pci.1,addr=0x0
The 'index' property identifies the PHB3 in the chip. In case of user
created devices, a lookup on 'chip-id' is required to assign the
owning chip.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220105212338.49899-7-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
pnv_phb4_rc_config_read() and pnv_phb4_rc_config_write() are asserting
the existence of the root port. The root port is now optional, and there
will be cases where a pnv-phb4 device won't have a root port attached.
Instead of asserting, check if the root port exists before read/writing
into it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220105212338.49899-6-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
We want to create only the absolutely minimal amount of devices when
running with -nodefaults. The root port is something that the machine
can boot up without. But, to do that, we need to provide a way for the
user to add them by hand.
This patch makes pnv-phb4-root-port user creatable and then uses the
pnv_phb_attach_root_port() helper to add a pnv_phb4_root_port only when
running with default settings.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220105212338.49899-5-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This cleanups the PHB3 model a bit more since the root port is an
independent device and it will ease our task when adding user created
PHB3s.
pnv_phb_attach_root_port() is made public in pnv.c so it can be reused
with the pnv_phb4 root port later.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220105212338.49899-4-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
A similar situation as described previously with pnv_phb3_root_port
devices also happens with pnv_phb4_root_ports.
The solution is the same: assign an unique chassis/slot combo for them.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220105212338.49899-3-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
When creating a pnv_phb3_root_port using the command line, the first
root port is created successfully, but the second fails with the
following error:
qemu-system-ppc64: -device pnv-phb3-root-port,bus=phb3-root.0,id=pcie.3:
Can't add chassis slot, error -16
This error comes from the realize() function of its parent type,
rp_realize() from TYPE_PCIE_ROOT_PORT. pcie_chassis_add_slot() fails
with -EBUSY if there's an existing PCIESlot that has the same
chassis/slot value, regardless of being in a different bus.
One way to prevent this error is simply set chassis and slot values in
the command line. However, since phb3 root buses only supports a single
root port, we can just get an unique chassis/slot value by checking
which root bus the pnv_phb3_root_port is going to be attached, get the
equivalent phb3 device and use its chip-id and index values, which are
guaranteed to be unique.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220105212338.49899-2-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This change has the same motivation as the one done for pnv-phb3-root-bus
buses previously. Defaulting every bus to 'root-bus' makes it impossible to attach
root ports to specific buses and it doesn't allow for custom bus
naming because we're ignoring the 'id' value when registering the root
bus.
After this patch, creating pnv-phb4 devices with 'id' being set will
result in the following qtree:
qemu-system-ppc64 -m 4G -machine powernv9,accel=tcg \
-device pnv-phb4,chip-id=0,index=0,id=pcie.0 \
-device pnv-phb4,chip-id=1,index=4,id=pcie.1
bus: main-system-bus
type System
dev: pnv-phb4, id "pcie.1"
index = 4 (0x4)
chip-id = 1 (0x1)
version = 704374636546 (0xa400000002)
device-id = 1217 (0x4c1)
x-config-reg-migration-enabled = true
bypass-iommu = false
bus: pcie.1
type pnv-phb4-root-bus
dev: pnv-phb4, id "pcie.0"
index = 0 (0x0)
chip-id = 0 (0x0)
version = 704374636546 (0xa400000002)
device-id = 1217 (0x4c1)
x-config-reg-migration-enabled = true
bypass-iommu = false
bus: pcie.0
type pnv-phb4-root-bus
And without setting any ids:
qemu-system-ppc64 -m 4G -machine powernv9,accel=tcg \
-device pnv-phb4,chip-id=0,index=0,id=pcie.0 \
-device pnv-phb4,chip-id=1,index=4,id=pcie.1
bus: main-system-bus
type System
dev: pnv-phb4, id ""
index = 4 (0x4)
chip-id = 1 (0x1)
version = 704374636546 (0xa400000002)
device-id = 1217 (0x4c1)
x-config-reg-migration-enabled = true
bypass-iommu = false
bus: pnv-phb4-root-bus.1
type pnv-phb4-root-bus
dev: pnv-phb4, id ""
index = 0 (0x0)
chip-id = 0 (0x0)
version = 704374636546 (0xa400000002)
device-id = 1217 (0x4c1)
x-config-reg-migration-enabled = true
bypass-iommu = false
bus: pnv-phb4-root-bus.0
type pnv-phb4-root-bus
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20211228193806.1198496-17-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
All pnv-phb3-root-bus buses are being created as 'root-bus'. This
makes it impossible to, for example, add a pnv-phb3-root-port in
a specific root bus, since they all have the same name. By default
the device will be parented by the pnv-phb3 device that precedeced it in
the QEMU command line.
Moreover, this doesn't all for custom bus naming. Libvirt, for instance,
likes to name these buses as 'pcie.N', where 'N' is the index value of
the controller in the domain XML, by using the 'id' command line
attribute. At this moment this is also being ignored - the created root
bus will always be named 'root-bus'.
This patch fixes both scenarios by removing the 'root-bus' name from the
pci_register_root_bus() call. If an "id" is provided, use that.
Otherwise use 'NULL' as bus name. The 'NULL' value will be handled in
qbus_init_internal() and it will defaulted as lowercase bus type + the
global bus_id value.
After this path we can define the bus name by using the 'id' attribute:
qemu-system-ppc64 -m 4G -machine powernv8,accel=tcg \
-device pnv-phb3,chip-id=0,index=1,id=pcie.0
dev: pnv-phb3, id "pcie.0"
index = 1 (0x1)
chip-id = 0 (0x0)
x-config-reg-migration-enabled = true
bypass-iommu = false
bus: pcie.0
type pnv-phb3-root-bus
And without an 'id' we will have the following default:
qemu-system-ppc64 -m 4G -machine powernv8,accel=tcg \
-device pnv-phb3,chip-id=0,index=1
dev: pnv-phb3, id ""
index = 1 (0x1)
chip-id = 0 (0x0)
x-config-reg-migration-enabled = true
bypass-iommu = false
bus: pnv-phb3-root-bus.0
type pnv-phb3-root-bus
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20211228193806.1198496-3-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The PHB4 reset handler was preparing ground for PHB5 to set
appropriately the device id. We don't need it for the PHB4 since the
device id is already set in the root port complex. PH5 will introduce
its own.
"device-id" property is now useless. It should be removed.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20211222063817.1541058-3-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This change will help us providing support for user created PHB4
devices.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20211213132830.108372-14-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This is not useful and will be in the way for support of user created
PHB4 devices.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20211213132830.108372-13-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Use the num_stacks class attribute to compute the PHB index depending
on the PEC index :
* PEC0 provides 1 PHB (PHB0)
* PEC1 provides 2 PHBs (PHB1 and PHB2)
* PEC2 provides 3 PHBs (PHB3, PHB4 and PHB5)
The routine pnv_pec_phb_offset() is a bit complex but it also prepares
ground for PHB5 which has a different layout of stacks: 3 per PECs.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20211213132830.108372-12-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Each PEC device of the POWER9 chip has a predefined number of stacks,
equivalent of a root port complex:
PEC0 -> 1 stack
PEC1 -> 2 stacks
PEC2 -> 3 stacks
Introduce a class attribute to hold these values and remove the
"num-stacks" property.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20211213132830.108372-11-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
And check the PEC index using the chip class.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20211213132830.108372-10-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
It prepares ground for PHB5 which has different values.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20211213132830.108372-9-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This change will help us providing support for user created PHB3
devices.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20211213132830.108372-6-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The maximum number of PHB3 devices per chip can be different depending
on the POWER8 processor model.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20211213132830.108372-4-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This change will help us move the mapping of XSCOM regions under the
PHB3 realize routine, which will be necessary for user created PHB3
devices.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20211213132830.108372-3-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
