When instantiating a user-created PHB on P9/P10, we don't really have
a reason any more to go through an indirection in pnv_chip_add_phb()
in pnv.c, we can go straight to the right function in
pnv_phb4_pec.c. That way, default PHBs and user-created PHBs are all
handled in the same file. This patch also renames pnv_phb4_get_pec()
to pnv_pec_add_phb() to better reflect that it "hooks" a PHB to a PEC.
For P8, the PHBs are parented to the chip directly, so it makes sense
to keep calling pnv_chip_add_phb() in pnv.c, to also be consistent
with where default PHBs are handled. The only change here is that,
since that function is now only used for P8, we can refine the return
type.
So overall, the PnvPHB front-end now has a pnv_phb_user_get_parent()
function which handles the parenting of the user-created PHBs by
calling the right function in the right file based on the processor
version. It's also easily extensible if we ever need to support a
different parent object.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20230302163715.129635-5-fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
PnvChip is typedef'ed in five places, and PnvPhb4PecState in two.
Keep one, drop the others.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20221222104628.659681-5-armbru@redhat.com>
The next commit needs to include hw/ppc/pnv.h from
hw/pci-host/pnv_phb.h. Avoid an inclusion loop.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20221222104628.659681-4-armbru@redhat.com>
A few headers neglect to include headers they need. They compile only
if something else includes the required header(s) first. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20221222104628.659681-3-armbru@redhat.com>
PnvChipClass, PnvChip, Pnv8Chip, Pnv9Chip, and Pnv10Chip are defined
in pnv.h. Many users of the header don't actually need them. One
instance is this inclusion loop: hw/ppc/pnv_homer.h includes
hw/ppc/pnv.h for typedef PnvChip, and vice versa for struct PnvHomer.
Similar structs live in their own headers: PnvHomerClass and PnvHomer
in pnv_homer.h, PnvLpcClass and PnvLpcController in pci_lpc.h,
PnvPsiClass, PnvPsi, Pnv8Psi, Pnv9Psi, Pnv10Psi in pnv_psi.h, ...
Move PnvChipClass, PnvChip, Pnv8Chip, Pnv9Chip, and Pnv10Chip to new
pnv_chip.h, and adjust include directives. This breaks the inclusion
loop mentioned above.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20221222104628.659681-2-armbru@redhat.com>
A number of headers neglect to include everything they need. They
compile only if the headers they need are already included from
elsewhere. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20221222120813.727830-3-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Currently objects including "hw/ppc/spapr.h" are forced to be
target specific due to the inclusion of "vof.h" in "spapr.h".
"spapr.h" only uses a Vof pointer, so doesn't require the structure
declaration. The only place where Vof structure is accessed is in
spapr.c, so include "vof.h" there, and forward declare the structure
in "spapr.h".
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20221213123550.39302-4-philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
"vof.h" doesn't need the full "cpu.h" to get the target_ulong
definition, including "exec/cpu-defs.h" is enough.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20221213123550.39302-3-philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Convert the TYPE_PHB3_MSI class to 3-phase reset, so we can
avoid using the device_class_set_parent_reset() function.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20221125115240.3005559-8-peter.maydell@linaro.org
This function is only used by the ppc4xx memory controller models so
it can be made static.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <b1504a82157a586aa284e8ee3b427b9a07b24169.1666194485.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
These are used by both the SDRAM controller model and system DCRs. In
preparation to move SDRAM controller in its own file move these macros
to the ppc4xx.h header.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <74d9bf4891e2ccceb52bb6ca6b54fd3f37a9fb04.1664021647.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Change the ppc440_sdram model to a QOM class derived from the
PPC4xx-dcr-device and name it ppc4xx-sdram-ddr2. This is mostly
modelling the DDR2 SDRAM controller found in the 460EX (used on the
sam460ex board). Newer SoCs (regardless of their PPC core, e.g. 405EX)
may have this controller but we only emulate enough of it for the
sam460ex u-boot firmware.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <3e82ae575c7c41e464a0082d55ecb4ebcc4d4329.1664021647.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Rename functions to avoid name clashes when moving the DDR2 controller
model currently called ppc440_sdram to ppc4xx_devs. This also more
clearly shows which function belongs to which model.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-Id: <9c09d10fbf36940ebbe30d7038d69cf3f2e58371.1664021647.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Remove the do_init parameter of ppc440_sdram_init and enable SDRAM
controller from the board. Firmware does this so it may only be needed
when booting with -kernel without firmware but we enable SDRAM
unconditionally to preserve previous behaviour.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <c2eda8f83c82f655aa7821a5a8c9310484bd6a1d.1664021647.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Change the ppc4xx_sdram model to a QOM class derived from the
PPC4xx-dcr-device and name it ppc4xx-sdram-ddr. This is mostly
modelling the DDR SDRAM controller found in the 440EP (used on the
bamboo board) but also backward compatible with the older DDR
controllers on some 405 SoCs so we also use it for those now. This
likely does not cause problems for guests we run as the new features
are just not accessed but to model 405 SoC accurately some features
may have to be disabled or the model split between 440 and older.
Newer SoCs (regardless of their PPC core, e.g. 405EX) may have an
updated DDR2 SDRAM controller implemented by the ppc440_sdram model
(only partially, enough for the 460EX on the sam460ex) that is not yet
QOM'ified in this patch. That is intended to become ppc4xx-sdram-ddr2
when QOM'ified later.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <8f820487fc9011343032c422ecdf3e8ee74d8c11.1664021647.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Instead of checking if memory size is valid in board code move this
check to ppc4xx_sdram_init() as this is a restriction imposed by the
SDRAM controller.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-Id: <39e5129dd095b285676a6267c5753786da1bc30d.1664021647.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Change ppc4xx_sdram_banks() to take one Ppc4xxSdramBank array instead
of the separate arrays and adjust ppc4xx_sdram_init() and
ppc440_sdram_init() accordingly as well as machines using these.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <e3a1fea51f29779fd6a61be90a29c684f3299544.1664021647.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
The do_init parameter of ppc4xx_sdram_init() is used to map memory
regions that is normally done by the firmware by programming the SDRAM
controller. Do this from board code emulating what firmware would do
when booting a kernel directly from -kernel without a firmware so we
can get rid of this do_init hack.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <d6c44c870befa1a075e21f1a59926dcdaff63f6b.1664021647.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Instead of storing sdram bank parameters in unrelated arrays put them
in a struct so it's clear they belong to the same bank and simplify
the state struct using this bank type.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-Id: <5eb82d0424c584b2b9e6f7bc51560f8189ed21bb.1664021647.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
This device is shared between different 4xx socs.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Message-Id: <63d9b14c8ff5f73e35bffca1036394b5235735ee.1660746880.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
The EBC is shared between 405 and 440 so move it to shared file.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Message-Id: <10eae70509ca4bd74858fc2c0a0f0e4eb9330199.1660746880.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
This device is shared between different 4xx socs.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Message-Id: <5b13ebfd12a71a28035bed5a915cbeee81cf21d1.1660746880.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
The PLB is shared between 405 and 440 so move it to the shared file.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Message-Id: <2498384bf3e18959ee8cb984d72fb66b8a6ecadc.1660746880.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
The Memory Access Layer (MAL) controller is currently modeled as a DCR
device with 4 IRQs. Also drop the ppc4xx_mal_init() helper and adapt
the sam460ex machine.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
[balaton: ppc4xx_dcr_register changes, add finalize method]
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Message-Id: <d54a243dff94d95ba30dbcc09c27700a90ade932.1660746880.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
The Device Control Registers (DCR) of on-SoC devices are accessed by
software through the use of the mtdcr and mfdcr instructions. These
are converted in transactions on a side band bus, the DCR bus, which
connects the on-SoC devices to the CPU.
Ideally, we should model these accesses with a DCR namespace and DCR
memory regions but today the DCR handlers are installed in a DCR table
under the CPU. Instead, introduce a little device model wrapper to hold
a CPU link and handle registration of DCR handlers.
The DCR device inherits from SysBus because most of these devices also
have MMIO regions and/or IRQs. Being a SysBusDevice makes things easier
to install the device model in the overall SoC.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
[balaton: Explicit opaque parameter for dcr callbacks]
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Message-Id: <9b21bdf55e0a728f093bad299e030d98f302ded0.1660746880.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Drop the use of ppc4xx_init() and duplicate a bit of code related to
clocks in the SoC realize routine. We will clean that up in the
following patches.
ppc_dcr_init() simply allocates default DCR handlers for the CPU. Maybe
this could be done in model initializer of the CPU families needing it.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Message-Id: <20220809153904.485018-8-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
When enabling user created PHBs (a change reverted by commit 9c10d86fee)
we were handling PHBs created by default versus by the user in different
manners. The only difference between these PHBs is that one will have a
valid phb3->chip that is assigned during pnv_chip_power8_realize(),
while the user created needs to search which chip it belongs to.
Aside from that there shouldn't be any difference. Making the default
PHBs behave in line with the user created ones will make it easier to
re-introduce them later on. It will also make the code easier to follow
since we are dealing with them in equal manner.
The first step is to turn chip8->phbs[] into a PnvPHB3 pointer array.
This will allow us to assign user created PHBs into it later on. The way
we initilize the default case is now more in line with that would happen
with the user created case: the object is created, parented by the chip
because pnv_xscom_dt() relies on it, and then assigned to the array.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220811163950.578927-6-danielhb413@gmail.com>
pnv_parent_qom_fixup() and pnv_parent_bus_fixup() are versions of the
helpers that were reverted by commit 9c10d86fee "ppc/pnv: Remove
user-created PHB{3,4,5} devices". They are needed to amend the QOM and
bus hierarchies of user created pnv-phbs, matching them with default
pnv-phbs.
A new helper pnv_phb_user_device_init() is created to handle
user-created devices setup. We're going to call it inside
pnv_phb_realize() in case we're realizing an user created device. This
will centralize all user device realated in a single spot, leaving the
realize functions of the phb3/phb4 backends untouched.
Another helper called pnv_chip_add_phb() was added to handle the
particularities of each chip version when adding a new PHB.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220811163950.578927-5-danielhb413@gmail.com>
The helper is only used in this file.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220624084921.399219-13-danielhb413@gmail.com>
We support only a single root port, PNV_PHB_ROOT_PORT.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220624084921.399219-10-danielhb413@gmail.com>
We need a handful of changes that needs to be done in a single swoop to
turn PnvPHB3 into a PnvPHB backend.
In the PnvPHB3, since the PnvPHB device implements PCIExpressHost and
will hold the PCI bus, change PnvPHB3 parent to TYPE_DEVICE. There are a
couple of instances in pnv_phb3.c that needs to access the PCI bus, so a
phb_base pointer is added to allow access to the parent PnvPHB. The
PnvPHB3 root port will now be connected to a PnvPHB object.
In pnv.c, the powernv8 machine chip8 will now hold an array of PnvPHB
objects. pnv_get_phb3_child() needs to be adapted to return the PnvPHB3
backend from the PnvPHB child. A global property is added in
pnv_machine_power8_class_init() to ensure that all PnvPHBs are created
with phb->version = 3.
After all these changes we're still able to boot a powernv8 machine with
default settings. The real gain will come with user created PnvPHB
devices, coming up next.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220624084921.399219-4-danielhb413@gmail.com>
The SBE (Self Boot Engine) are on-chip microcontrollers that perform
early boot steps, as well as provide some runtime facilities (e.g.,
timer, secure register access, MPIPL). The latter facilities are
accessed mostly via a message system called SBEFIFO.
This driver provides initial emulation for the SBE runtime registers
and a very basic SBEFIFO implementation that provides the timer
command. This covers the basic SBE behaviour expected by skiboot when
booting.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220811093726.1442343-1-npiggin@gmail.com>
[danielhb: fixed SBE_HOST_RESPONSE_MASK long line]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
The new PAPR 2.12 defines a watchdog facility managed via the new
H_WATCHDOG hypercall.
This adds H_WATCHDOG support which a proposed driver for pseries uses:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=303120
This was tested by running QEMU with a debug kernel and command line:
-append \
"pseries-wdt.timeout=60 pseries-wdt.nowayout=1 pseries-wdt.action=2"
and running "echo V > /dev/watchdog0" inside the VM.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220622051008.1067464-1-aik@ozlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
PAPR+/LoPAPR says:
===
The platform must restore the default DMA window for the PE on a call
to the ibm,remove-pe-dma-window RTAS call when all of the following
are true:
a. The call removes the last DMA window remaining for the PE.
b. The DMA window being removed is not the default window
===
This resets DMA as PAPR mandates.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220622052955.1069903-1-aik@ozlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
It is not advisable to execute an object_dynamic_cast() to poke into
bus->qbus.parent and follow it up with a C cast into the PnvPHB type we
think we got.
In fact this is not needed. There is nothing sophisticated being done
with the PHB object retrieved during root_port_realize() for both PHB3
and PHB4. We're retrieving a PHB reference just to access phb->chip_id
and phb->phb_id and use them to define the chassis/slot of the root
port.
phb->phb_id is already being passed to pnv_phb_attach_root_port() via
the 'index' parameter. Let's also add a 'chip_id' parameter to this
function and assign chassis and slot right there. This will spare us
from the hassle of accessing the PHB object inside realize().
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220621173436.165912-4-danielhb413@gmail.com>
-machine graphics=off is the usual way to tell the firmware or the OS that the
user wants a serial console. The pseries machine however does not support
this, and never adds the stdout-path node to the device tree if a VGA device
is provided. This is in addition to the other magic behavior of VGA devices,
which is to add a keyboard and mouse to the default USB bus.
Split spapr->has_graphics in two variables so that the two behaviors can be
separated: the USB devices remains the same, but the stdout-path is added
even with "-device VGA -machine graphics=off".
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220507054826.124936-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Leading underscores are ill-advised because such identifiers are
reserved. Trailing underscores are merely ugly. Strip both.
Our header guards commonly end in _H. Normalize the exceptions.
Macros should be ALL_CAPS. Normalize the exception.
Done with scripts/clean-header-guards.pl.
include/hw/xen/interface/ and tools/virtiofsd/ left alone, because
these were imported from Xen and libfuse respectively.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220506134911.2856099-3-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
When pulling or pushing an OS context from/to a CPU, we should
re-evaluate the state of the External interrupt signal. Otherwise, we
can end up catching the External interrupt exception in hypervisor
mode, which is unexpected.
The problem is best illustrated with the following scenario:
1. an External interrupt is raised while the guest is on the CPU.
2. before the guest can ack the External interrupt, an hypervisor
interrupt is raised, for example the Hypervisor Decrementer or
Hypervisor Virtualization interrupt. The hypervisor interrupt forces
the guest to exit while the External interrupt is still pending.
3. the hypervisor handles the hypervisor interrupt. At this point, the
External interrupt is still pending. So it's very likely to be
delivered while the hypervisor is running. That's unexpected and can
result in an infinite loop where the hypervisor catches the External
interrupt, looks for an interrupt in its hypervisor queue, doesn't
find any, exits the interrupt handler with the External interrupt
still raised, repeat...
The fix is simply to always lower the External interrupt signal when
pulling an OS context. It means it needs to be raised again when
re-pushing the OS context. Fortunately, it's already the case, as we
now always call xive_tctx_ipb_update(), which will raise the signal if
needed.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220429071620.177142-3-fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
There are still some files in the QEMU PPC code base that use TABs for
indentation instead of using spaces. The TABs should be replaced so
that we have a consistent coding style.
Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/374
Signed-off-by: Guo Zhi <qtxuning1999@sjtu.edu.cn>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220412021240.2080218-1-qtxuning1999@sjtu.edu.cn>
[danielhb: trimmed commit msg to 72 chars per line]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
All devices raising PSI interrupts are now converted to use GPIO lines
and the pnv_psi_irq_set() routines have become useless. Drop them.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220323072846.1780212-5-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Use an anonymous output GPIO line to connect the OCC device with the
PSIHB device and raise the appropriate PSI IRQ line depending on the
processor model.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220323072846.1780212-4-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Create an anonymous output GPIO line to connect the LPC device with
the PSIHB device and raise the appropriate PSI IRQ line depending on
the processor model.
A temporary __pnv_psi_irq_set() routine is introduced to handle the
transition. It will be removed when all devices raising PSI interrupts
are converted to use GPIOs.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220323072846.1780212-3-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
On HW, the PSI and FSP interrupt levels are muxed under the same
interrupt number. For coding reasons, an extra IRQ number was
introduced to index register values in an array. It increased the
count of IRQs which do not fit in the PSI IRQ range anymore.
The PSI and FSP interrupts should be modeled with an extra level of
GPIO lines but since QEMU does not support them, simply drop the extra
number to stay within the IRQ range.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220323072846.1780212-2-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Recently the LoPAPR spec got a new 2MB pagesize to support in Dynamic DMA
Windows API (DDW), this adds the new flag.
Linux supports it since
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=38727311871
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Message-Id: <20220321071945.918669-1-aik@ozlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
The timebase is allocated during spapr_realize_vcpu() and it's not
freed. This results in memory leaks when doing vcpu unplugs:
==636935==
==636935== 144 (96 direct, 48 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 6
,461 of 8,135
==636935== at 0x4897468: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:760)
==636935== by 0x5077213: g_malloc0 (in /usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0.6400.4)
==636935== by 0x507757F: g_malloc0_n (in /usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0.6400.4)
==636935== by 0x93C3FB: cpu_ppc_tb_init (ppc.c:1066)
==636935== by 0x97BC2B: spapr_realize_vcpu (spapr_cpu_core.c:268)
==636935== by 0x97C01F: spapr_cpu_core_realize (spapr_cpu_core.c:337)
==636935== by 0xD4626F: device_set_realized (qdev.c:531)
==636935== by 0xD55273: property_set_bool (object.c:2273)
==636935== by 0xD523DF: object_property_set (object.c:1408)
==636935== by 0xD588B7: object_property_set_qobject (qom-qobject.c:28)
==636935== by 0xD52897: object_property_set_bool (object.c:1477)
==636935== by 0xD4579B: qdev_realize (qdev.c:333)
==636935==
This patch adds a cpu_ppc_tb_free() helper in hw/ppc/ppc.c to allow us
to free the timebase. This leak is then solved by calling
cpu_ppc_tb_free() in spapr_unrealize_vcpu().
Fixes: 6f4b5c3ec5 ("spapr: CPU hot unplug support")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220329124545.529145-2-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
On a real system with POWER{8,9,10} processors, PHBs are sub-units of
the processor, they can be deactivated by firmware but not plugged in
or out like a PCI adapter on a slot. Nevertheless, having user-created
PHBs in QEMU seemed to be a good idea for testing purposes :
1. having a limited set of PHBs speedups boot time.
2. it is useful to be able to mimic a partially broken topology you
some time have to deal with during bring-up.
PowerNV is also used for distro install tests and having libvirt
support eases these tasks. libvirt prefers to run the machine with
-nodefaults to be sure not to drag unexpected devices which would need
to be defined in the domain file without being specified on the QEMU
command line. For this reason :
3. -nodefaults should not include default PHBs
User-created PHB{3,4,5} devices satisfied all these needs but reality
proves to be a bit more complex, internally when modeling such
devices, and externally when dealing with the user interface.
Req 1. and 2. can be simply addressed differently with a machine option:
"phb-mask=<uint>", which QEMU would use to enable/disable PHB device
nodes when creating the device tree.
For Req 3., we need to make sure we are taking the right approach. It
seems that we should expose a new type of user-created PHB device, a
generic virtualized one, that libvirt would use and not one depending
on the processor revision. This needs more thinking.
For now, remove user-created PHB{3,4,5} devices. All the cleanups we
did are not lost and they will be useful for the next steps.
Fixes: 5bc67b052b ("ppc/pnv: Introduce user creatable pnv-phb4 devices")
Fixes: 1f6a88fffc ("ppc/pnv: Introduce support for user created PHB3 devices")
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220314130514.529931-1-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The XIVE interrupt controller on P10 can automatically save and
restore the state of the interrupt registers under the internal NVP
structure representing the VCPU. This saves a costly store/load in
guest entries and exits.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
