docs/devel/qapi-code-gen demands that the "second and subsequent lines
of sections other than "Example"/"Examples" should be indented".
Commit a937b6aa739q (qapi: Reformat doc comments to conform to current
conventions) missed a few instances, and messed up a few others.
Clean that up.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20240205074709.3613229-5-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
The QAPI schema doc comment language provides special syntax for
command and event arguments, struct and union members, alternate
branches, enumeration values, and features: descriptions starting with
"@name:".
By convention, we format them like this:
# @name: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit,
# sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore
# magna aliqua.
Okay for names as short as "name", but we have much longer ones. Their
description gets squeezed against the right margin, like this:
# @dirty-sync-missed-zero-copy: Number of times dirty RAM synchronization could
# not avoid copying dirty pages. This is between
# 0 and @dirty-sync-count * @multifd-channels.
# (since 7.1)
The description text is effectively just 50 characters wide. Easy
enough to read, but can be cumbersome to write.
The awkward squeeze against the right margin makes people go beyond it,
which produces two undesirables: arguments about style, and descriptions
that are unnecessarily hard to read, like this one:
# @postcopy-vcpu-blocktime: list of the postcopy blocktime per vCPU. This is
# only present when the postcopy-blocktime migration capability
# is enabled. (Since 3.0)
We could instead format it like
# @postcopy-vcpu-blocktime:
# list of the postcopy blocktime per vCPU. This is only present
# when the postcopy-blocktime migration capability is
# enabled. (Since 3.0)
or, since the commit before previous, like
# @postcopy-vcpu-blocktime:
# list of the postcopy blocktime per vCPU. This is only present
# when the postcopy-blocktime migration capability is
# enabled. (Since 3.0)
However, I'd rather have
# @postcopy-vcpu-blocktime: list of the postcopy blocktime per vCPU.
# This is only present when the postcopy-blocktime migration
# capability is enabled. (Since 3.0)
because this is how rST field and option lists work.
To get this, we need to let the first non-blank line after the
"@name:" line determine expected indentation.
This fills up the indentation pitfall mentioned in
docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.rst. A related pitfall still exists. Update
the text to show it.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230428105429.1687850-14-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
[Work around lack of walrus operator in Python 3.7 and older]
When an argument's description starts on the line after the "#arg: "
line, indentation is stripped only from the description's first line,
as demonstrated by the previous commit. Moreover, subsequent lines
with less indentation are not rejected.
Make the first line's indentation the expected indentation for the
remainder of the description. This fixes indentation stripping, and
also requires at least that much indentation.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230428105429.1687850-12-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Improve the comments to better describe what they test.
Cover argument description starting on a new line indented. This
style isn't documented in docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.rst. qapi-gen.py
accepts it, but messes up indentation: it's stripped from the first
line, not subsequent ones. The next commit will fix this.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230428105429.1687850-11-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
The QAPI generator doesn't reject undocumented members and
features (yet). doc-good.json covers this, with clear "is
undocumented" notes to signal intent.
Except for @Variant1 member @var1, where it's "(but no @var: line)".
Less clear. Replace by "@var1 is undocumented".
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230428105429.1687850-10-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
This is quite similar to commit 84ab008687 "qapi: Add feature flags to
struct members", only for enums instead of structs.
Special feature flag 'deprecated' is silently ignored there. This is
okay only because it will be implemented shortly.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20211025042405.3762351-3-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Drop tests that are specifically about simple unions:
* SugaredUnion in doc-good: flat unions are covered by @Object.
* union-branch-case and union-clash-branches: branch naming for flat
unions is enforced for the tag enum instead, which is covered by
enum-member-case and enum-clash-member.
* union-empty: empty flat unions are covered by flat-union-empty.
Rewrite the remainder to use flat unions: args-union, bad-base,
flat-union-base-union, union-branch-invalid-dict, union-unknown.
Except drop union-optional-branch. because converting this one is not
worth the trouble; we don't explicitly check names beginning with '*'
in other places, either.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210917143134.412106-21-armbru@redhat.com>
Since commit 5d83b9a130 "qapi: replace if condition list with dict
{'all': [...]}", we represent if conditionals as trees consisting of
OrderedDict, list and str. This results in less than legible test
output. For instance:
if OrderedDict([('not', OrderedDict([('any', [OrderedDict([('not', 'TEST_IF_EVT')]), OrderedDict([('not', 'TEST_IF_STRUCT')])])]))])
We intend to replace OrderedDict by dict when we get Python 3.7, which
will result in more legible output:
if {'not': {'any': [{'not': 'TEST_IF_EVT'}, {'not': 'TEST_IF_STRUCT'}]}}
Can't wait: put in a hack to get that now, with a comment to revert it
when we replace OrderedDict.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210831123809.1107782-11-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
The C code generated for 'if' conditionals is incorrectly
parenthesized. For instance,
'if': { 'not': { 'any': [ { 'not': 'TEST_IF_EVT' },
{ 'not': 'TEST_IF_STRUCT' } ] } } }
generates
#if !(!defined(TEST_IF_EVT)) || (!defined(TEST_IF_STRUCT))
This is wrong. Correct would be:
#if !(!defined(TEST_IF_EVT) || !defined(TEST_IF_STRUCT))
Cover the issue in qapi-schema-test.json. This generates bad #if in
tests/test-qapi-events.h and other files.
Add a similar condition to doc-good.json. The generated documentation
is fine.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210831123809.1107782-5-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Change the 'if' condition strings to be C-agnostic. It will accept
'[A-Z][A-Z0-9_]*' identifiers. This allows to express configuration
conditions in other languages (Rust or Python for ex) or other more
suitable forms.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Tested-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210804083105.97531-11-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
[Rebased with semantic conflict in redefined-event.json]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
For the sake of completeness, introduce the 'not' condition.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210804083105.97531-10-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
[Long line broken in tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.json]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Replace the simple list sugar form with a recursive structure that will
accept other operators in the following commits (all, any or not).
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210804083105.97531-7-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
[Accidental code motion undone. Degenerate :forms: comment dropped.
Helper _check_if() moved. Error messages tweaked. ui.json updated.
Accidental changes to qapi-schema-test.json dropped.]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Event names should be ALL_CAPS with words separated by underscore.
Enforce this. The only offenders are in tests/. Fix them. Existing
test event-case covers the new error.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210323094025.3569441-14-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Use './builtin' as the built-in module name instead of
None. Clarify the typing that this is now always a string.
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210201193747.2169670-9-jsnow@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
doc-good.json currently uses the old *strong* and _emphasis_ markup.
As part of the conversion to rST this needs to switch to **strong**
and *emphasis*, because rST uses underscores as part of its markup
of hyperlinks and will otherwise warn about the syntax error.
In commit a660eed482 we fixed up the in-tree uses of the
old markup:
1) _this_ was replaced with *this*
2) the only in-tree use of *this* was left alone (turning
a 'strong' into an 'emphasis')
(and so currently in-tree nothing is using either new-style
**strong** or old-style _emphasis_).
Update doc-good.json in a similar way:
1) replace _this_ with *this*
2) remove the usage of old-style *this*
(This slightly reduces the coverage for the old Texinfo generator,
which is about to go away, but is fine for the new rST generator
because that does not need to handle strong/emphasis itself because
it is simply passing the entire text as raw rST to Sphinx.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200925162316.21205-13-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Make the handling of indentation in doc comments more sophisticated,
so that when we see a section like:
Notes: some text
some more text
indented line 3
we save it for the doc-comment processing code as:
some text
some more text
indented line 3
and when we see a section with the heading on its own line:
Notes:
some text
some more text
indented text
we also accept that and save it in the same form.
If we detect that the comment document text is not indented as much
as we expect it to be, we throw a parse error. (We don't complain
about over-indented sections, because for rST this can be legitimate
markup.)
The golden reference for the doc comment text is updated to remove
the two 'wrong' indents; these now form a test case that we correctly
stripped leading whitespace from an indented multi-line argument
definition.
We update the documentation in docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.txt to
describe the new indentation rules.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200925162316.21205-6-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
[Whitespace between sentences tweaked]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
As we accumulate lines from doc comments when parsing the JSON, the
QAPIDoc class generally strips leading and trailing whitespace using
line.strip() when it calls _append_freeform(). This is fine for
Texinfo, but for rST leading whitespace is significant. We'd like to
move to having the text in doc comments be rST format rather than a
custom syntax, so move the removal of leading whitespace from the
QAPIDoc class to the texinfo-specific processing code in
texi_format() in qapi/doc.py.
(Trailing whitespace will always be stripped by the rstrip() in
Section::append regardless.)
In a followup commit we will make the whitespace in the lines of doc
comment sections more consistently follow the input source.
There is no change to the generated .texi files before and after this
commit.
Because the qapi-schema test checks the exact values of the
documentation comments against a reference, we need to update that
reference to match the new whitespace. In the first four places this
is now correctly checking that we did put in the amount of whitespace
to pass a rST-formatted list to the backend; in the last two places
the extra whitespace is 'wrong' and will go away again in the
following commit.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200925162316.21205-5-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
doc-good.json tests doc comment parser corner cases. We're about to
largely replace it by a Sphinx extension, which will have different
corner cases. Tweak the test so it passes both with the old parser
and the Sphinx extension, by making it match the more restrictive
rST syntax:
* in a single list the bullet types must all match
* lists must have leading and following blank lines
* the rules on when and where indentation matters differ
* the '|' example syntax is going to go away entirely, so stop
testing it
This will avoid the tests spuriously breaking when we tighten up the
parser code in the following commits.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200925162316.21205-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Our current QAPI doc-comment markup allows section headers (introduced
with a leading '=' or '==') anywhere in a free-form documentation
comment. This works for Texinfo because the generator simply prints a
Texinfo section command at that point in the output stream. For rST
generation, since we're assembling a tree of docutils nodes, this is
awkward because a new section implies starting a new section node at
the top level of the tree and generating text into there.
Make section headers start a new free-form documentation block, so the
future rST document generator doesn't have to look at every line in
free-form blocks and handle headings in odd places.
This change makes no difference to the generated Texinfo.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200320091805.5585-3-armbru@redhat.com>
In v4.1.0, we added feature flags just to struct types (commit
6a8c0b5102^..f3ed93d545), to satisfy an immediate need (commit
c9d4070991 "file-posix: Add dynamic-auto-read-only QAPI feature"). In
v4.2.0, we added them to commands (commit 23394b4c39 "qapi: Add
feature flags to commands") to satisfy another immediate need (commit
d76744e65e "qapi: Allow introspecting fix for savevm's cooperation
with blockdev").
Add them to the remaining definitions: enumeration types, union types,
alternate types, and events.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200317115459.31821-13-armbru@redhat.com>
Generate a reference "Arguments: the members of ...", just like we do
for commands since commit c2dd311cb7 "qapi2texi: Implement boxed
argument documentation".
No change to generated QMP documentation; we don't yet use boxed
events outside tests/.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20191024110237.30963-7-armbru@redhat.com>
Commit 8aa3a33e44 "tests/qapi-schema: Test for good feature lists in
structs" made test-qapi.py show features, but neglected to show their
documentation. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20191024110237.30963-5-armbru@redhat.com>
Add negative tests doc-bad-boxed-command-arg and doc-bad-event-arg to
cover boxed and no arguments. They demonstrate insufficient doc
comment checking.
Update positive test doc-good to cover boxed event arguments. It
demonstrates the generated doc comment misses arguments.
These bugs will be fixed later in this series.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20191024110237.30963-3-armbru@redhat.com>
Commit 8aa3a33e44 "tests/qapi-schema: Test for good feature lists in
structs" neglected to cover documentation comments, and the previous
commit followed its example. Make up for them.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20191018081454.21369-5-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Command and event details are indented three spaces, everything else
four. Messed up in commit 156402e504. Use four spaces consistently.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20191018081454.21369-2-armbru@redhat.com>
We neglect to call .visit_module() for the special module we use for
built-ins. Harmless, but clean it up anyway. The
tests/qapi-schema/*.out now show the built-in module as 'module None'.
Subclasses of QAPISchemaModularCVisitor need to ._add_module() this
special module to enable code generation for built-ins. When this
hasn't been done, QAPISchemaModularCVisitor.visit_module() does
nothing for the special module. That looks like built-ins could
accidentally be generated into the wrong module when a subclass
neglects to call ._add_module(). Can't happen, because built-ins are
all visited before any other module. But that's non-obvious. Switch
off code generation explicitly.
Rename QAPISchemaModularCVisitor._begin_module() to
._begin_user_module().
New QAPISchemaModularCVisitor._is_builtin_module(), for clarity.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190214152251.2073-4-armbru@redhat.com>
Use a common function to generate the "If:..." line.
While at it, get rid of the existing \n\n (no idea why it was
there). Use a line-break in member description, this seems to look
slightly better in the plaintext version.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20181213123724.4866-19-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Commit 93bda4dd46 changed the internal representation of enum type
members from str to QAPISchemaMember, but we still print only a
string. Has been good enough, as the name is the member's only
attribute of interest, but that's about to change. To prepare, print
them more like object type members.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20181213123724.4866-4-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
The documentation is generated only once, and doesn't know C
pre-conditions. Add 'If:' sections for top-level entities.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20180703155648.11933-13-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
use new allow-preconfig parameter in tests and make sure that
the QAPISchema can parse allow-preconfig correctly
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1526058959-41425-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
The allow_oob parameter was passed in but not used in tests. Now
reflect that in the tests, so we need to touch up other command testers
with that new change.
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20180326063901.27425-6-peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
The include directive permits modular QAPI schemata, but the generated
code is monolithic all the same. To permit generating modular code,
the front end needs to pass more information on inclusions to the back
ends. The commit before last added the necessary information to the
parse tree. This commit adds it to the intermediate representation
and its QAPISchemaVisitor. A later commit will use this to to
generate modular code.
New entity QAPISchemaInclude represents inclusions. Call new visitor
method visit_include() for it, so visitors can see the sub-modules a
module includes.
Note that unlike other entities, QAPISchemaInclude has no name, and is
therefore not added to entity_dict.
New QAPISchemaEntity attribute @module names the entity's source file.
Call new visitor method visit_module() when it changes during a visit,
so visitors can keep track of the module being visited.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20180211093607.27351-18-armbru@redhat.com>
[eblake: avoid accidental deletion of self._predefining]
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
The generators' conversion to visitors (merge commit 9e72681d16)
changed the processing order of entities from source order to
alphabetical order. The next commit needs source order, so change it
back.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20180211093607.27351-17-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
We have two representations of sections without a name: the main
section uses name=None, the others name=''. Standardize on name=None.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20171002141341.24616-8-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
A negative test case crept into doc-good.json: invalid use of section
markup we currently fail to reject. Move this into its own
doc-bad-section.json.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20171002141341.24616-6-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
We would like to use a same QObject type to represent numbers, whether
they are int, uint, or floats. Getters will allow some compatibility
between the various types if the number fits other representations.
Add a few more tests while at it.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20170607163635.17635-7-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
[parse_stats_intervals() simplified a bit, comment in
test_visitor_in_int_overflow() tidied up, suppress bogus warnings]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
We have a number of negative tests, but we don't have systematic
positive coverage. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1490015515-25851-6-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
