Correct the indexing into s->cpu_ctlr for vCPUs.
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Luc Michel <luc.michel@greensocs.com>
Message-id: 20201214222154.3480243-2-edgar.iglesias@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The GICv2 allows the implementation to implement a variable number
of priority bits; unimplemented bits in the priority registers
are read as zeros, writes ignored. We were previously always
implementing a full 8 bits of priority, which is allowed but not
what the real hardware typically does (which is usually to have
4 or 5 bits of priority).
Add a new device property to allow the number of implemented
property bits to be specified.
Signed-off-by: Sai Pavan Boddu <sai.pavan.boddu@xilinx.com>
Message-id: 1582537164-764-2-git-send-email-sai.pavan.boddu@xilinx.com
Suggested-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
[PMM: improved commit message]
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Suggested-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190709152053.16670-2-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
[Rebased onto merge commit 95a9457fd44; missed instances of qom/cpu.h
in comments replaced]
In my "build everything" tree, changing hw/irq.h triggers a recompile
of some 5400 out of 6600 objects (not counting tests and objects that
don't depend on qemu/osdep.h).
hw/hw.h supposedly includes it for convenience. Several other headers
include it just to get qemu_irq and.or qemu_irq_handler.
Move the qemu_irq and qemu_irq_handler typedefs from hw/irq.h to
qemu/typedefs.h, and then include hw/irq.h only where it's still
needed. Touching it now recompiles only some 500 objects.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190812052359.30071-13-armbru@redhat.com>
The GIC_BASE_IRQ macro is a leftover from when we shared code
between the GICv2 and the v7M NVIC. Since the NVIC is now
split off, GIC_BASE_IRQ is always 0, and we can just delete it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Luc Michel <luc.michel@greensocs.com>
Message-id: 20180824161819.11085-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Reduce the size of the per-cpu GICH memory regions from 0x1000
to 0x200. The registers only cover 0x200 bytes, and the Cortex-A15
wants to map them at a spacing of 0x200 bytes apart. Having the
region be too large interferes with mapping them like that, so
reduce it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Luc Michel <luc.michel@greensocs.com>
Message-id: 20180821132811.17675-3-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Add some traces to the ARM GIC to catch register accesses (distributor,
(v)cpu interface and virtual interface), and to take into account
virtualization extensions (print `vcpu` instead of `cpu` when needed).
Also add some virtualization extensions specific traces: LR updating
and maintenance IRQ generation.
Signed-off-by: Luc Michel <luc.michel@greensocs.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180727095421.386-19-luc.michel@greensocs.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Implement the maintenance interrupt generation that is part of the GICv2
virtualization extensions.
Signed-off-by: Luc Michel <luc.michel@greensocs.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180727095421.386-18-luc.michel@greensocs.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Add the gic_update_virt() function to update the vCPU interface states
and raise vIRQ and vFIQ as needed. This commit renames gic_update() to
gic_update_internal() and generalizes it to handle both cases, with a
`virt' parameter to track whether we are updating the CPU or vCPU
interfaces.
The main difference between CPU and vCPU is the way we select the best
IRQ. This part has been split into the gic_get_best_(v)irq functions.
For the virt case, the LRs are iterated to find the best candidate.
Signed-off-by: Luc Michel <luc.michel@greensocs.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180727095421.386-17-luc.michel@greensocs.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Implement the read and write functions for the virtual interface of the
virtualization extensions in the GICv2.
One mirror region per CPU is also created, which maps to that specific
CPU id. This is required by the GIC architecture specification.
Signed-off-by: Luc Michel <luc.michel@greensocs.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180727095421.386-16-luc.michel@greensocs.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Add the read/write functions to handle accesses to the vCPU interface.
Those accesses are forwarded to the real CPU interface, with the CPU id
being converted to the corresponding vCPU id (vCPU id = CPU id +
GIC_NCPU).
Signed-off-by: Luc Michel <luc.michel@greensocs.com>
Message-id: 20180727095421.386-15-luc.michel@greensocs.com
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Implement virtualization extensions in the gic_cpu_read() and
gic_cpu_write() functions. Those are the last bits missing to fully
support virtualization extensions in the CPU interface path.
Signed-off-by: Luc Michel <luc.michel@greensocs.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180727095421.386-14-luc.michel@greensocs.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Implement virtualization extensions in the gic_deactivate_irq() and
gic_complete_irq() functions.
When the guest writes an invalid vIRQ to V_EOIR or V_DIR, since the
GICv2 specification is not entirely clear here, we adopt the behaviour
observed on real hardware:
* When V_CTRL.EOIMode is false (EOI split is disabled):
- In case of an invalid vIRQ write to V_EOIR:
-> If some bits are set in H_APR, an invalid vIRQ write to V_EOIR
triggers a priority drop, and increments V_HCR.EOICount.
-> If V_APR is already cleared, nothing happen
- An invalid vIRQ write to V_DIR is ignored.
* When V_CTRL.EOIMode is true:
- In case of an invalid vIRQ write to V_EOIR:
-> If some bits are set in H_APR, an invalid vIRQ write to V_EOIR
triggers a priority drop.
-> If V_APR is already cleared, nothing happen
- An invalid vIRQ write to V_DIR increments V_HCR.EOICount.
Signed-off-by: Luc Michel <luc.michel@greensocs.com>
Message-id: 20180727095421.386-13-luc.michel@greensocs.com
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Implement virtualization extensions in the gic_acknowledge_irq()
function. This function changes the state of the highest priority IRQ
from pending to active.
When the current CPU is a vCPU, modifying the state of an IRQ modifies
the corresponding LR entry. However if we clear the pending flag before
setting the active one, we lose track of the LR entry as it becomes
invalid. The next call to gic_get_lr_entry() will fail.
To overcome this issue, we call gic_activate_irq() before
gic_clear_pending(). This does not change the general behaviour of
gic_acknowledge_irq.
We also move the SGI case in gic_clear_pending_sgi() to enhance
code readability as the virtualization extensions support adds a if-else
level.
Signed-off-by: Luc Michel <luc.michel@greensocs.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180727095421.386-12-luc.michel@greensocs.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Implement virtualization extensions in gic_activate_irq() and
gic_drop_prio() and in gic_get_prio_from_apr_bits() called by
gic_drop_prio().
When the current CPU is a vCPU:
- Use GIC_VIRT_MIN_BPR and GIC_VIRT_NR_APRS instead of their non-virt
counterparts,
- the vCPU APR is stored in the virtual interface, in h_apr.
Signed-off-by: Luc Michel <luc.michel@greensocs.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180727095421.386-11-luc.michel@greensocs.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Add some helper functions to gic_internal.h to get or change the state
of an IRQ. When the current CPU is not a vCPU, the call is forwarded to
the GIC distributor. Otherwise, it acts on the list register matching
the IRQ in the current CPU virtual interface.
gic_clear_active can have a side effect on the distributor, even in the
vCPU case, when the correponding LR has the HW field set.
Use those functions in the CPU interface code path to prepare for the
vCPU interface implementation.
Signed-off-by: Luc Michel <luc.michel@greensocs.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 20180727095421.386-10-luc.michel@greensocs.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
An access to the CPU interface is non-secure if the current GIC instance
implements the security extensions, and the memory access is actually
non-secure. Until then, it was checked with tests such as
if (s->security_extn && !attrs.secure) { ... }
in various places of the CPU interface code.
With the implementation of the virtualization extensions, those tests
must be updated to take into account whether we are in a vCPU interface
or not. This is because the exposed vCPU interface does not implement
security extensions.
This commits replaces all those tests with a call to the
gic_cpu_ns_access() function to check if the current access to the CPU
interface is non-secure. This function takes into account whether the
current CPU is a vCPU or not.
Note that this function is used only in the (v)CPU interface code path.
The distributor code path is left unchanged, as the distributor is not
exposed to vCPUs at all.
Signed-off-by: Luc Michel <luc.michel@greensocs.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 20180727095421.386-9-luc.michel@greensocs.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Add some helper macros and functions related to the virtualization
extensions to gic_internal.h.
The GICH_LR_* macros help extracting specific fields of a list register
value. The only tricky one is the priority field as only the MSB are
stored. The value must be shifted accordingly to obtain the correct
priority value.
gic_is_vcpu() and gic_get_vcpu_real_id() help with (v)CPU id manipulation
to abstract the fact that vCPU id are in the range
[ GIC_NCPU; (GIC_NCPU + num_cpu) [.
gic_lr_* and gic_virq_is_valid() help with the list registers.
gic_get_lr_entry() returns the LR entry for a given (vCPU, irq) pair. It
is meant to be used in contexts where we know for sure that the entry
exists, so we assert that entry is actually found, and the caller can
avoid the NULL check on the returned pointer.
Signed-off-by: Luc Michel <luc.michel@greensocs.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180727095421.386-8-luc.michel@greensocs.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Add the necessary parts of the virtualization extensions state to the
GIC state. We choose to increase the size of the CPU interfaces state to
add space for the vCPU interfaces (the GIC_NCPU_VCPU macro). This way,
we'll be able to reuse most of the CPU interface code for the vCPUs.
The only exception is the APR value, which is stored in h_apr in the
virtual interface state for vCPUs. This is due to some complications
with the GIC VMState, for which we don't want to break backward
compatibility. APRs being stored in 2D arrays, increasing the second
dimension would lead to some ugly VMState description. To avoid
that, we keep it in h_apr for vCPUs.
The vCPUs are numbered from GIC_NCPU to (GIC_NCPU * 2) - 1. The
`gic_is_vcpu` function help to determine if a given CPU id correspond to
a physical CPU or a virtual one.
For the in-kernel KVM VGIC, since the exposed VGIC does not implement
the virtualization extensions, we report an error if the corresponding
property is set to true.
Signed-off-by: Luc Michel <luc.michel@greensocs.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180727095421.386-6-luc.michel@greensocs.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Some functions are now only used in arm_gic.c, put them static. Some of
them where only used by the NVIC implementation and are not used
anymore, so remove them.
Signed-off-by: Luc Michel <luc.michel@greensocs.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180727095421.386-4-luc.michel@greensocs.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Implement GICD_ISACTIVERn and GICD_ICACTIVERn registers in the GICv2.
Those registers allow to set or clear the active state of an IRQ in the
distributor.
Signed-off-by: Luc Michel <luc.michel@greensocs.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180727095421.386-3-luc.michel@greensocs.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
In preparation for the virtualization extensions implementation,
refactor the name of the functions and macros that act on the GIC
distributor to make that fact explicit. It will be useful to
differentiate them from the ones that will act on the virtual
interfaces.
Signed-off-by: Luc Michel <luc.michel@greensocs.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Sai Pavan Boddu <sai.pavan.boddu@xilinx.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180727095421.386-2-luc.michel@greensocs.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The GICD_ITARGETSR implementation still has some 11MPCore behaviour
that we were incorrectly using in our GICv1 and GICv2 implementations
for the case where the interrupt number is less than GIC_INTERNAL.
The desired behaviour here is:
* for 11MPCore: RAZ/WI for irqs 0..28; read a number matching the
CPU doing the read for irqs 29..31
* for GICv1 and v2: RAZ/WI if uniprocessor; otherwise read a
number matching the CPU doing the read for all irqs < 32
Stop squashing GICD_ITARGETSR to 0 for IRQs 0..28 unless this
is an 11MPCore GIC.
Reported-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Luc Michel <luc.michel@greensocs.com>
Message-id: 20180712154152.32183-3-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In gic_deactivate_irq() the interrupt number comes from the guest
(on a write to the GICC_DIR register), so we need to sanity check
that it isn't out of range before we use it as an array index.
Handle this in a similar manner to the check we do in
gic_complete_irq() for the GICC_EOI register.
The array overrun is not disastrous because the calling code
uses (value & 0x3ff) to extract the interrupt field, so the
only out-of-range values possible are 1020..1023, which allow
overrunning only from irq_state[] into the following
irq_target[] array which the guest can already manipulate.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Luc Michel <luc.michel@greensocs.com>
Message-id: 20180712154152.32183-2-peter.maydell@linaro.org
When C_CTRL.CBPR is 1, the Non-Secure view of C_BPR is altered:
- A Non-Secure read of C_BPR should return the BPR value plus 1,
saturated to 7,
- A Non-Secure write should be ignored.
Signed-off-by: Luc MICHEL <luc.michel@git.antfield.fr>
Message-id: 20180119145756.7629-6-luc.michel@greensocs.com
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
[PMM: fixed comment typo]
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
When determining the group priority of a group 1 IRQ, if C_CTRL.CBPR is
0, the non-secure BPR value is used. However, this value must be
incremented by one so that it matches the secure world number of
implemented priority bits (NS world has one less priority bit compared
to the Secure world).
Signed-off-by: Luc MICHEL <luc.michel@git.antfield.fr>
Message-id: 20180119145756.7629-5-luc.michel@greensocs.com
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
[PMM: add assert, as the gicv3 code has]
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
When there is no active interrupts in the GIC, a read to the C_RPR
register should return the value of the "Idle priority", which is either
the maximum value an IRQ priority field can be set to, or 0xff.
Since the QEMU GIC model implements all the 8 priority bits, the Idle
priority is 0xff.
Internally, when there is no active interrupt, the running priority
value is 0x100. The gic_get_running_priority function returns an uint8_t
and thus, truncate this value to 0x00 when returning it. This is wrong since
a value of 0x00 correspond to the maximum possible priority.
This commit fixes the returned value when the internal value is 0x100.
Note that it is correct for the Non-Secure view to return 0xff even
though from the NS world point of view, only 7 priority bits are
implemented. The specification states that the Idle priority can be 0xff
even when not all the 8 priority bits are implemented. This has been
verified against a real GICv2 hardware on a Xilinx ZynqMP based board.
Regarding the ARM11MPCore version of the GIC, the specification is not
clear on that point, so this commit does not alter its behavior.
Signed-off-by: Luc MICHEL <luc.michel@git.antfield.fr>
Message-id: 20180119145756.7629-4-luc.michel@greensocs.com
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
In the GIC, when an IRQ is acknowledged, its state goes from "pending"
to:
- "active" if the corresponding IRQ pin has been de-asserted
- "active and pending" otherwise.
The GICv2 manual states that when a IRQ becomes active (or active and
pending), the GIC should either signal another (higher priority) IRQ to
the CPU if there is one, or de-assert the CPU IRQ pin.
The current implementation of the GIC in QEMU does not check if the
IRQ is already active when looking for pending interrupts with
sufficient priority in gic_update(). This can lead to signaling an
interrupt that is already active.
This usually happens when splitting priority drop and interrupt
deactivation. On priority drop, the IRQ stays active until deactivation.
If it becomes pending again, chances are that it will be incorrectly
selected as best_irq in gic_update().
This commit fixes this by checking if the IRQ is not already active when
looking for best_irq in gic_update().
Note that regarding the ARM11MPCore GIC version, the corresponding
manual is not clear on that point, but it has has no priority
drop/interrupt deactivation separation, so this case should not happen.
Signed-off-by: Luc MICHEL <luc.michel@git.antfield.fr>
Message-id: 20180119145756.7629-3-luc.michel@greensocs.com
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The GICv2 specification says that reserved register addresses
must RAZ/WI; now that we implement external abort handling
for Arm CPUs this means we must return MEMTX_OK rather than
MEMTX_ERROR, to avoid generating a spurious guest data abort.
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1513183941-24300-3-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xilinx.com>
When running with KVM enabled, you can choose between emulating the
gic in kernel or user space. If the kernel supports in-kernel virtualization
of the interrupt controller, it will default to that. If not, if will
default to user space emulation.
Unfortunately when running in user mode gic emulation, we miss out on
interrupt events which are only available from kernel space, such as the timer.
This patch leverages the new kernel/user space pending line synchronization for
timer events. It does not handle PMU events yet.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Message-id: 1498577737-130264-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
While I was debugging the icount issues I realised a bunch of the
messages look quite similar. I've fixed this by including __func__ in
the debug print. At the same time I move the a modern if (GATE) style
printf which ensures the compiler can check for format string errors
even if the code gets optimised away in the non-DEBUG_GIC case.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Now that the NVIC is its own separate implementation, we can
clean up the GIC code by removing REV_NVIC and conditionals
which use it.
Signed-off-by: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
According to ARM DUI 0552A 4.2.10. NVIC set pending status
also for disabled interrupts. Correct the logic for
when interrupts are marked pending both on input level
transition and when interrupts are dismissed, to match
the NVIC behaviour rather than the 11MPCore GIC.
Signed-off-by: Marcin Krzeminski <marcin.krzeminski@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Treat non-secure accesses to registers and bits in registers of secure
interrupts as RAZ/WI.
Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1464273945-2055-1-git-send-email-jens.wiklander@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
These are obviously critical to understanding interrupt delivery:
gic_enable_irq
gic_disable_irq
gic_set_irq (inbound irq from device models)
gic_update_set_irq (outbound irq to CPU)
gic_acknowledge_irq
The only one that I think might raise eyebrows is gic_update_bestirq, but I've
(sadly) debugged problems that ended up being caused by unexpected priorities.
Knowing that the GIC has an irq ready, but doesn't deliver to the CPU due to
priority, has also proven important.
Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollis_blanchard@mentor.com>
Message-id: 1461252281-22399-1-git-send-email-hollis_blanchard@mentor.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Commit 57cb38b included qapi/error.h into qemu/osdep.h to get the
Error typedef. Since then, we've moved to include qemu/osdep.h
everywhere. Its file comment explains: "To avoid getting into
possible circular include dependencies, this file should not include
any other QEMU headers, with the exceptions of config-host.h,
compiler.h, os-posix.h and os-win32.h, all of which are doing a
similar job to this file and are under similar constraints."
qapi/error.h doesn't do a similar job, and it doesn't adhere to
similar constraints: it includes qapi-types.h. That's in excess of
100KiB of crap most .c files don't actually need.
Add the typedef to qemu/typedefs.h, and include that instead of
qapi/error.h. Include qapi/error.h in .c files that need it and don't
get it now. Include qapi-types.h in qom/object.h for uint16List.
Update scripts/clean-includes accordingly. Update it further to match
reality: replace config.h by config-target.h, add sysemu/os-posix.h,
sysemu/os-win32.h. Update the list of includes in the qemu/osdep.h
comment quoted above similarly.
This reduces the number of objects depending on qapi/error.h from "all
of them" to less than a third. Unfortunately, the number depending on
qapi-types.h shrinks only a little. More work is needed for that one.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
[Fix compilation without the spice devel packages. - Paolo]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
The GICv2 introduces a new CPU interface register GICC_DIR, which
allows an OS to split the "priority drop" and "deactivate interrupt"
parts of interrupt completion. Implement this register.
(Note that the register is at offset 0x1000 in the CPU interface,
which means it is on a different 4K page from all the other registers.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Fedorov <serge.fdrv@gmail.com>
Message-id: 1456854176-7813-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Clean up includes so that osdep.h is included first and headers
which it implies are not included manually.
This commit was created with scripts/clean-includes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1453832250-766-13-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Update the GIC ID registers (registers above 0xfe0) based on the GIC
revision instead of using the sames values for all GIC implementations.
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xilinx.com>
Tested-by: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
Message-id: 629e7fa5d47f2800e51cc1f18d12635f1eece349.1453333840.git.alistair.francis@xilinx.com
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Upon activating an interrupt, set the corresponding priority bit in the
APR/NSAPR registers without touching the currently set bits. In the event
of nested interrupts, the GIC will then have the information it needs to
restore the priority of the pre-empted interrupt once the higher priority
interrupt finishes execution.
Signed-off-by: François Baldassari <francois@pebble.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
arm_gic.c retrieves CPU number using either NUM_CPU(s) or s->num_cpu.
Such mixed-uses make source code inconsistent. This patch removes
NUM_CPU(s), which was defined for MPCore tweak long ago, and instead
favors s->num_cpu. The source is more consistent after this small tweak.
Reviewed-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Wei Huang <wei@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Message-id: 1446744293-32365-1-git-send-email-wei@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
A number of source files have statements accidentally
terminated by a double semicolon - eg 'foo = bar;;'.
This is harmless but a mistake none the less.
The tcg/ia64/tcg-target.c file is whitelisted because
it has valid use of ';;' in a comment containing assembly
code.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Although we were correctly handling interrupts becoming active
and then inactive, we weren't actually exposing this to the guest
by setting the 'active' flag for the interrupt, so reads
of GICD_ICACTIVERn and GICD_ISACTIVERn would generally incorrectly
return zeroes. Correct this oversight.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1438089748-5528-6-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The running_irq and last_active arrays represent state which
doesn't exist in a real hardware GIC. The only thing we use
them for is updating the running priority when an interrupt
is completed, but in fact we can use the active-priority
registers to do this. The running priority is always the
priority corresponding to the lowest set bit in the active
priority registers, because only one interrupt at any
particular priority can be active at once.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1438089748-5528-5-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
A GICv2 has both GICC_APR<n> and GICC_NSAPR<n> registers, with
the latter holding the active priority bits for Group 1 interrupts
(usually Nonsecure interrupts), and the Nonsecure view of the
GICC_APR<n> is the second half of the GICC_NSAPR<n> registers.
Turn our half-hearted implementation of APR<n> into a proper
implementation of both APR<n> and NSAPR<n>:
* Add the underlying state for NSAPR<n>
* Make sure APR<n> aren't visible for pre-GICv2
* Implement reading of NSAPR<n>
* Make non-secure reads of APR<n> behave correctly
* Implement writing to APR<n> and NSAPR<n>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1438089748-5528-4-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Priority values for the GIC are divided into a "group priority"
and a "subpriority" (with the division being determined by the
binary point register). The running priority is only determined
by the group priority of the active interrupts, not the
subpriority. In particular, this means that there can't be more
than one active interrupt at any particular group priority.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1438089748-5528-3-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Extracted duplicated initialization code from SW-emulated and KVM GIC
implementations and put into gic_init_irqs_and_mmio()
Signed-off-by: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
Message-id: 8ea5b2781ef39cb5989420987fc73c70e377687d.1438758065.git.p.fedin@samsung.com
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
