The PNV_XSCOM_BASE and PNV_XSCOM_SIZE macros are specific to POWER8
and they are used when the device tree is populated and the MMIO
region created, even for POWER9 chips. This is not too much of a
problem today because we don't have important devices on the second
chip, but we might have oneday (PHBs).
Fix by using the appropriate macros in case of P9.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20190612174345.9799-2-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Leading underscores are ill-advised because such identifiers are
reserved. Trailing underscores are merely ugly. Strip both.
Our header guards commonly end in _H. Normalize the exceptions.
Done with scripts/clean-header-guards.pl.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190315145123.28030-7-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
[Changes to slirp/ dropped, as we're about to spin it off]
The POWER9 processor does not support per-core frequency control. The
cores are arranged in groups of four, along with their respective L2
and L3 caches, into a structure known as a Quad. The frequency must be
managed at the Quad level.
Provide a basic Quad model to fake the settings done by the firmware
on the Non-Cacheable Unit (NCU). Each core pair (EX) needs a special
BAR setting for the TIMA area of XIVE because it resides on the same
address on all chips.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20190307223548.20516-12-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
The OCC on POWER9 is very similar to the one found on POWER8. Provide
the same routines with P9 values for the registers and IRQ number.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20190307223548.20516-10-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
The PSI bridge on POWER9 is very similar to POWER8. The BAR is still
set through XSCOM but the controls are now entirely done with MMIOs.
More interrupts are defined and the interrupt controller interface has
changed to XIVE. The POWER9 model is a first example of the usage of
the notify() handler of the XiveNotifier interface, linking the PSI
XiveSource to its owning device model.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20190307223548.20516-3-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
This is a simple model of the POWER9 XIVE interrupt controller for the
PowerNV machine which only addresses the needs of the skiboot
firmware. The PowerNV model reuses the common XIVE framework developed
for sPAPR as the fundamentals aspects are quite the same. The
difference are outlined below.
The controller initial BAR configuration is performed using the XSCOM
bus from there, MMIO are used for further configuration.
The MMIO regions exposed are :
- Interrupt controller registers
- ESB pages for IPIs and ENDs
- Presenter MMIO (Not used)
- Thread Interrupt Management Area MMIO, direct and indirect
The virtualization controller MMIO region containing the IPI ESB pages
and END ESB pages is sub-divided into "sets" which map portions of the
VC region to the different ESB pages. These are modeled with custom
address spaces and the XiveSource and XiveENDSource objects are sized
to the maximum allowed by HW. The memory regions are resized at
run-time using the configuration of EDT set translation table provided
by the firmware.
The XIVE virtualization structure tables (EAT, ENDT, NVTT) are now in
the machine RAM and not in the hypervisor anymore. The firmware
(skiboot) configures these tables using Virtual Structure Descriptor
defining the characteristics of each table : SBE, EAS, END and
NVT. These are later used to access the virtual interrupt entries. The
internal cache of these tables in the interrupt controller is updated
and invalidated using a set of registers.
Still to address to complete the model but not fully required is the
support for block grouping. Escalation support will be necessary for
KVM guests.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20190306085032.15744-7-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
This redefinition generates warnings on some clang compilers and older
gcc4.4.
...include/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h:24:24: warning: redefinition of typedef 'PnvChip' is a C11
feature [-Wtypedef-redefinition]
typedef struct PnvChip PnvChip;
^
...include/hw/ppc/pnv.h:65:3: note: previous definition is here
} PnvChip;
^
1 warning generated.
CC ppc64-softmmu/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.o
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
The XSCOM base address of the core chiplet was wrongly calculated. Use
the OPAL macros to fix that and do a couple of renames.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
The 'pnv' prefix is now used for all and the routines populating the
device tree start with 'pnv_dt'. The handler of the PnvXScomInterface
is also renamed to 'dt_xscom' which should reflect that it is
populating the device tree under the 'xscom@' node of the chip.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Although none of the existing macro call-sites were broken,
it's always better to write macros that properly parenthesize
arguments that can be complex expressions, so that the intended
order of operations is not broken.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
The OCC is an on-chip microcontroller based on a ppc405 core used
for various power management tasks. It comes with a pile of additional
hardware sitting on the PIB (aka XSCOM bus). At this point we don't
emulate it (nor plan to do so). However there is one facility which
is provided by the surrounding hardware that we do need, which is the
interrupt generation facility. OPAL uses it to send itself interrupts
under some circumstances and there are other uses around the corner.
So this implement just enough to support this.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
[clg: - updated for qemu-2.9
- changed the XSCOM interface to fit new model
- QOMified the model ]
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
The Processor Service Interface (PSI) Controller is one of the engines
of the "Bridge" unit which connects the different interfaces to the
Power Processor.
This adds just enough of the PSI bridge to handle various on-chip and
the one external interrupt. The rest of PSI has to do with the link to
the IBM FSP service processor which we don't plan to emulate (not used
on OpenPower machines).
The ics_get() and ics_resend() handlers of the XICSFabric interface of
the PowerNV machine are now defined to handle the Interrupt Control
Source of PSI. The InterruptStatsProvider interface is also modified
to dump the new ICS.
Originally from Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
The XSCOM addresses for the core registers are encoded in a slightly
different way on POWER8 and POWER9.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
PnvChip is defined twice and this can confuse old compilers :
CC ppc64-softmmu/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.o
In file included from qemu.git/hw/ppc/pnv.c:29:
qemu.git/include/hw/ppc/pnv.h:60: error: redefinition of typedef ‘PnvChip’
qemu.git/include/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h:24: note: previous declaration of ‘PnvChip’ was here
make[1]: *** [hw/ppc/pnv.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
The LPC (Low Pin Count) interface on a POWER8 is made accessible to
the system through the ADU (XSCOM interface). This interface is part
of set of units connected together via a local OPB (On-Chip Peripheral
Bus) which act as a bridge between the ADU and the off chip LPC
endpoints, like external flash modules.
The most important units of this OPB are :
- OPB Master: contains the ADU slave logic, a set of internal
registers and the logic to control the OPB.
- LPCHC (LPC HOST Controller): which implements a OPB Slave, a set of
internal registers and the LPC HOST Controller to control the LPC
interface.
Four address spaces are provided to the ADU :
- LPC Bus Firmware Memory
- LPC Bus Memory
- LPC Bus I/O (ISA bus)
- and the registers for the OPB Master and the LPC Host Controller
On POWER8, an intermediate hop is necessary to reach the OPB, through
a unit called the ECCB. OPB commands are simply mangled in ECCB write
commands.
On POWER9, the OPB master address space can be accessed via MMIO. The
logic is same but the code will be simpler as the XSCOM and ECCB hops
are not necessary anymore.
This version of the LPC controller model doesn't yet implement support
for the SerIRQ deserializer present in the Naples version of the chip
though some preliminary work is there.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
[clg: - updated for qemu-2.7
- ported on latest PowerNV patchset
- changed the XSCOM interface to fit new model
- QOMified the model
- moved the ISA hunks in another patch
- removed printf logging
- added a couple of UNIMP logging
- rewrote commit log ]
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Now that we are using real HW ids for the cores in PowerNV chips, we
can route the XSCOM accesses to them. We just need to attach a
specific XSCOM memory region to each core in the appropriate window
for the core number.
To start with, let's install the DTS (Digital Thermal Sensor) handlers
which should return 38°C for each core.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
On a real POWER8 system, the Pervasive Interconnect Bus (PIB) serves
as a backbone to connect different units of the system. The host
firmware connects to the PIB through a bridge unit, the
Alter-Display-Unit (ADU), which gives him access to all the chiplets
on the PCB network (Pervasive Connect Bus), the PIB acting as the root
of this network.
XSCOM (serial communication) is the interface to the sideband bus
provided by the POWER8 pervasive unit to read and write to chiplets
resources. This is needed by the host firmware, OPAL and to a lesser
extent, Linux. This is among others how the PCI Host bridges get
configured at boot or how the LPC bus is accessed.
To represent the ADU of a real system, we introduce a specific
AddressSpace to dispatch XSCOM accesses to the targeted chiplets. The
translation of an XSCOM address into a PCB register address is
slightly different between the P9 and the P8. This is handled before
the dispatch using a 8byte alignment for all.
To customize the device tree, a QOM InterfaceClass, PnvXScomInterface,
is provided with a populate() handler. The chip populates the device
tree by simply looping on its children. Therefore, each model needing
custom nodes should not forget to declare itself as a child at
instantiation time.
Based on previous work done by :
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
[dwg: Added cpu parameter to xscom_complete()]
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cédric Le Goater