At present the SiFive PLIC model "priority-base" expects interrupt
priority register base starting from source 1 instead source 0,
that's why on most platforms "priority-base" is set to 0x04 except
'opentitan' machine. 'opentitan' should have set "priority-base"
to 0x04 too.
Note the irq number calculation in sifive_plic_{read,write} is
correct as the codes make up for the irq number by adding 1.
Let's simply update "priority-base" to start from interrupt source
0 and add a comment to make it crystal clear.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng@tinylab.org>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Wilfred Mallawa <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20221211030829.802437-14-bmeng@tinylab.org>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
SiFiveEState inherits from SysBusDevice while it's TypeInfo claims it to
inherit from TYPE_MACHINE. This is an inconsistency which can cause
undefined behavior such as memory corruption.
Change SiFiveEState to inherit from MachineState since it is registered
as a machine.
Fixes: 0869490b1c ("riscv: sifive_e: Manually define the machine")
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-Id: <20220922075232.33653-1-shentey@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Some of the enum constant names conflict with a QOM type check
macro (SIFIVE_E_PRCI). This needs to be addressed to allow us to
transform the QOM type check macros into functions generated by
OBJECT_DECLARE_TYPE().
Rename all the constants to SIFIVE_E_DEV_*, to avoid conflicts.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20200911173447.165713-2-ehabkost@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
This is an effort to clean up the hw/riscv directory. Ideally it
should only contain the RISC-V SoC / machine codes plus generic
codes. Let's move sifive_gpio model to hw/gpio directory.
Note this also removes the trace-events in the hw/riscv directory,
since gpio is the only supported trace target in that directory.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <1599129623-68957-5-git-send-email-bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Device "riscv.sifive.e.soc" is a direct subtype of TYPE_DEVICE, but
its instance struct SiFiveESoCState's member @parent_obj is
SysBusDevice instead of DeviceState. Correct that.
Same for "riscv.sifive.u.soc"'s instance struct SiFiveUSoCState.
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Cc: Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@wdc.com>
Cc: Sagar Karandikar <sagark@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: Bastian Koppelmann <kbastian@mail.uni-paderborn.de>
Cc: qemu-riscv@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20200609122339.937862-21-armbru@redhat.com>
Group SiFive E and U cpu type defines into one header file.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Back in 2016, we discussed[1] rules for headers, and these were
generally liked:
1. Have a carefully curated header that's included everywhere first. We
got that already thanks to Peter: osdep.h.
2. Headers should normally include everything they need beyond osdep.h.
If exceptions are needed for some reason, they must be documented in
the header. If all that's needed from a header is typedefs, put
those into qemu/typedefs.h instead of including the header.
3. Cyclic inclusion is forbidden.
This patch gets include/ closer to obeying 2.
It's actually extracted from my "[RFC] Baby steps towards saner
headers" series[2], which demonstrates a possible path towards
checking 2 automatically. It passes the RFC test there.
[1] Message-ID: <87h9g8j57d.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/msg03345.html
[2] Message-Id: <20190711122827.18970-1-armbru@redhat.com>
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-07/msg02715.html
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20190812052359.30071-2-armbru@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Coverity pointed out a memory leak in riscv_sifive_e_soc_realize(),
where a pair of recently added MemoryRegion instances would not be freed
if there were errors elsewhere in the function. The fix here is to
simply not use dynamic allocation for these instances: there's always
one of each in SiFiveESoCState, so instead we just include them within
the struct.
Fixes: 30efbf330a ("SiFive RISC-V GPIO Device")
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Suggested-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
QEMU model of the GPIO device on the SiFive E300 series SOCs.
The pins are not used by a board definition yet, however this
implementation can already be used to trigger GPIO interrupts from the
software by configuring a pin as both output and input.
Signed-off-by: Fabien Chouteau <chouteau@adacore.com>
Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
This patch fixes four different things, to maintain bisectability they
have been merged into a single patch. The following fixes are below:
sifive_plic: Fix incorrect irq calculation
The irq is incorrectly calculated to be off by one. It has worked in the
past as the priority_base offset has also been set incorrectly. We are
about to fix the priority_base offset so first first the irq
calculation.
sifive_u: Fix PLIC priority base offset and numbering
According to the FU540 manual the PLIC source priority address starts at
an offset of 0x04 and not 0x00. The same manual also specifies that the
PLIC only has 53 source priorities. Fix these two incorrect header
files.
We also need to over extend the plic_gpios[] array as the PLIC sources
count from 1 and not 0.
riscv: sifive_e: Fix PLIC priority base offset
According to the FE31 manual the PLIC source priority address starts at
an offset of 0x04 and not 0x00.
riscv: virt: Fix PLIC priority base offset
Update the virt offsets based on the newly updated SiFive U and SiFive E
offsets.
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Removes a whole lot of unnecessary boilerplate code. Machines
don't need to be objects. The expansion of the SOC object model
for the RISC-V machines will happen in the future as SiFive
plans to add their FE310 and FU540 SOCs to QEMU. However, it
seems that this present boilerplate is complete unnecessary.
Cc: Sagar Karandikar <sagark@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: Bastian Koppelmann <kbastian@mail.uni-paderborn.de>
Signed-off-by: Michael Clark <mjc@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
This provides a RISC-V Board compatible with the the SiFive Freedom E SDK.
The following machine is implemented:
- 'sifive_e'; CLINT, PLIC, UART, AON, GPIO, QSPI, PWM
Acked-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sagar Karandikar <sagark@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Clark <mjc@sifive.com>
