If the flag BDRV_REQ_PREFETCH was set, skip idling read/write
operations in COR-driver. It can be taken into account for the
COR-algorithms optimization. That check is being made during the
block stream job by the moment.
Add the BDRV_REQ_PREFETCH flag to the supported_read_flags of the
COR-filter.
block: Modify the comment for the flag BDRV_REQ_PREFETCH as we are
going to use it alone and pass it to the COR-filter driver for further
processing.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201216061703.70908-9-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Add an option to limit copy-on-read operations to specified sub-chain
of backing-chain, to make copy-on-read filter useful for block-stream
job.
Suggested-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
[vsementsov: change subject, modified to freeze the chain,
do some fixes]
Message-Id: <20201216061703.70908-6-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Provide API for the COR-filter removal. Also, drop the filter child
permissions for an inactive state when the filter node is being
removed.
To insert the filter, the block generic layer function
bdrv_insert_node() can be used.
The new function bdrv_cor_filter_drop() may be considered as an
intermediate solution before the QEMU permission update system has
overhauled. Then we are able to implement the API function
bdrv_remove_node() on the block generic layer.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201216061703.70908-4-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Add support for the recently introduced functions
bdrv_co_preadv_part()
and
bdrv_co_pwritev_part()
to the COR-filter driver.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20201216061703.70908-2-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
With bdrv_filter_bs(), we can easily handle this default filter behavior
in bdrv_co_block_status().
blkdebug wants to have an additional assertion, so it keeps its own
implementation, except bdrv_co_block_status_from_file() needs to be
inlined there.
Suggested-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Implementations should decide the necessary permissions based on @role.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200513110544.176672-35-mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Note that some filters have secondary children, namely blkverify (the
image to be verified) and blklogwrites (the log). This patch does not
touch those children.
Note that for blkverify, the filtered child should not be format-probed.
While there is nothing enforcing this here, in practice, it will not be:
blkverify implements .bdrv_file_open. The block layer ensures (and in
fact, asserts) that BDRV_O_PROTOCOL is set for every BDS whose driver
implements .bdrv_file_open. This flag will then be bequeathed to
blkverify's children, and they will thus (by default) not be probed
either.
("By default" refers to the fact that blkverify's other child (the
non-filtered one) will have BDRV_O_PROTOCOL force-unset, because that is
what happens for all non-filtered children of non-format drivers.)
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200513110544.176672-27-mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
For now, all callers pass 0 and no callee evaluates this value. Later
patches will change both.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200513110544.176672-7-mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
For now, it is always set to 0. Later patches in this series will
ensure that all callers pass an appropriate combination of flags.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200513110544.176672-6-mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This structure nearly only contains parent callbacks for child state
changes. It cannot really reflect a child's role, because different
roles may overlap (as we will see when real roles are introduced), and
because parents can have custom callbacks even when the child fulfills a
standard role.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
Message-Id: <20200513110544.176672-4-mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
It no longer has any users.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20200218103454.296704-11-mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
No other filter driver has a .bdrv_co_truncate() implementation, and
there is no need to because the general block layer code can handle it
just as well.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20190918095144.955-3-mreitz@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
The copy-on-read drive must not request the WRITE_UNCHANGED permission
for its child if the node is inactive, otherwise starting a migration
destination with -incoming will fail because the child cannot provide
write access yet:
qemu-system-x86_64: -blockdev copy-on-read,file=img,node-name=cor: Block node is read-only
Earlier QEMU versions additionally ran into an abort() on the migration
source side: bdrv_inactivate_recurse() failed to update permissions.
This is silently ignored today because it was only supposed to loosen
restrictions. This is the symptom that was originally reported here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733022
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Filter drivers that support .bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes can safely advertise
BDRV_REQ_NO_FALLBACK because they just forward the request flags to
their child node.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
.bdrv_close handler is optional after previous commit, no needs to keep
empty functions more.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Other I/O functions are already using a BdrvChild pointer in the API, so
make discard do the same. It makes it possible to initiate the same
permission checks before doing I/O, and much easier to share the
helper functions for this, which will be added and used by write,
truncate and copy range paths.
Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_truncate() is an operation that can block (even for a quite long
time, depending on the PreallocMode) in I/O paths that shouldn't block.
Convert it to a coroutine_fn so that we have the infrastructure for
drivers to make their .bdrv_co_truncate implementation asynchronous.
This change could potentially introduce new race conditions because
bdrv_truncate() isn't necessarily executed atomically any more. Whether
this is a problem needs to be evaluated for each block driver that
supports truncate:
* file-posix/win32, gluster, iscsi, nfs, rbd, ssh, sheepdog: The
protocol drivers are trivially safe because they don't actually yield
yet, so there is no change in behaviour.
* copy-on-read, crypto, raw-format: Essentially just filter drivers that
pass the request to a child node, no problem.
* qcow2: The implementation modifies metadata, so it needs to hold
s->lock to be safe with concurrent I/O requests. In order to avoid
double locking, this requires pulling the locking out into
preallocate_co() and using qcow2_write_caches() instead of
bdrv_flush().
* qed: Does a single header update, this is fine without locking.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Update the rest of the filter drivers to support
BDRV_REQ_WRITE_UNCHANGED. They already forward write request flags to
their children, so we just have to announce support for it.
This patch does not cover the replication driver because that currently
does not support flags at all, and because it just grabs the WRITE
permission for its children when it can, so we should be fine just
submitting the incoming WRITE_UNCHANGED requests as normal writes.
It also does not cover format drivers for similar reasons. They all use
bdrv_format_default_perms() as their .bdrv_child_perm() implementation
so they just always grab the WRITE permission for their file children
whenever possible. In addition, it often would be difficult to
ascertain whether incoming unchanging writes end up as unchanging writes
in their files. So we just leave them as normal potentially changing
writes.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
Message-id: 20180421132929.21610-7-mreitz@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
This adds a simple copy-on-read filter driver. It relies on the already
existing COR functionality in the central block layer code, which may be
moved here once we no longer need it there.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20180421132929.21610-2-mreitz@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
