Let's support up to 509 mem slots, just like vhost in the kernel usually
does and the rust vhost-user implementation recently [1] started doing.
This is required to properly support memory hotplug, either using
multiple DIMMs (ACPI supports up to 256) or using virtio-mem.
The 509 used to be the KVM limit, it supported 512, but 3 were
used for internal purposes. Currently, KVM supports more than 512, but
it usually doesn't make use of more than ~260 (i.e., 256 DIMMs + boot
memory), except when other memory devices like PCI devices with BARs are
used. So, 509 seems to work well for vhost in the kernel.
Details can be found in the QEMU change that made virtio-mem consume
up to 256 mem slots across all virtio-mem devices. [2]
509 mem slots implies 509 VMAs/mappings in the worst case (even though,
in practice with virtio-mem we won't be seeing more than ~260 in most
setups).
With max_map_count under Linux defaulting to 64k, 509 mem slots
still correspond to less than 1% of the maximum number of mappings.
There are plenty left for the application to consume.
[1] https://github.com/rust-vmm/vhost/pull/224
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230926185738.277351-1-david@redhat.com/
Reviewed-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael@enfabrica.net>
Acked-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20240214151701.29906-3-david@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Mario Casquero <mcasquer@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Let's prepare for increasing VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS by dynamically
allocating dev->regions. We don't have any ABI guarantees (not
dynamically linked), so we can simply change the layout of VuDev.
Let's zero out the memory, just as we used to do.
Reviewed-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael@enfabrica.net>
Acked-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20240214151701.29906-2-david@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Mario Casquero <mcasquer@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
There is no need to use the Linux-internal __u64 type, 1ULL is
guaranteed to be wide enough.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240117160313.175609-1-pbonzini@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
The VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_XEN_MMAP feature bit was defined in
f21e95ee97, which has been part of qemu's 8.1.0 release. However, it
seems it was never added to qemu's code, but it is well possible that it
is already used by different front-ends outside of qemu (i.e., Xen).
VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_SHARED_OBJECT in contrast was added to qemu's code
in 1609476662, but never defined in the vhost-user specification. As a
consequence, both bits were defined to be 17, which cannot work.
Regardless of whether actual code or the specification should take
precedence, F_XEN_MMAP is already part of a qemu release, while
F_SHARED_OBJECT is not. Therefore, bump the latter to take number 18
instead of 17, and add this to the specification.
Take the opportunity to add at least a little note on the
VhostUserShared structure to the specification. This structure is
referenced by the new commands introduced in 1609476662, but was not
defined.
Fixes: 1609476662
("vhost-user: add shared_object msg")
Signed-off-by: Hanna Czenczek <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20231016083201.23736-1-hreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emmanouil Pitsidianakis <manos.pitsidianakis@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Rename shadowing variables to make this code compilable
with -Wshadow=local.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231006121129.487251-1-thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
In the libvhost-user library we need to
handle VHOST_USER_GET_SHARED_OBJECT requests,
and add helper functions to allow sending messages
to interact with the virtio shared objects
hash table.
Signed-off-by: Albert Esteve <aesteve@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20231002065706.94707-5-aesteve@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Explain Coverity that we are not going to overflow vmsg->fds.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20230925194040.68592-5-vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Slave/master nomenclature was replaced with backend/frontend in commit
1fc19b6527 ("vhost-user: Adopt new backend naming")
This patch replaces all remaining uses of master and slave in the
codebase.
Signed-off-by: Emmanouil Pitsidianakis <manos.pitsidianakis@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20230613080849.2115347-1-manos.pitsidianakis@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
The source file uses VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 which is
not defined by <linux/virtio_config.h> on Debian 10.
The system-provided <linux/virtio_config.h> which
does not include the macro definition is included
through <linux/vhost.h>, so fix the issue by including
the standard-headers version before that.
Signed-off-by: David 'Digit' Turner <digit@google.com>
Message-Id: <20230405125920.2951721-2-digit@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Currently block_resize qmp command is simply ignored by vhost-user-blk
export. So, the block-node is successfully resized, but virtio config
is unchanged and guest doesn't see that disk is resized.
Let's handle the resize by modifying the config and notifying the guest
appropriately.
After this comment, lsblk in linux guest with attached
vhost-user-blk-pci device shows new size immediately after block_resize
QMP command on vhost-user exported block node.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20230321201323.3695923-1-vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
The Vhost-user specification changed feature and request
naming from _SLAVE_ to _BACKEND_.
This patch adopts the new naming convention.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230208203259.381326-3-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
In case libvhost-user is used externally, that projects compiler
warnings might be more strict. Enforce an extra set of compiler warnings
to catch issues early on.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <737ebf2e697f8640558e6f73d96a692711f548f6.1671741278.git.marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Since it was proposed to change the code in libvduse.c to use memcpy
instead of an assignment, the code in libvhost-user.c should also be
changed to use memcpy.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <502b22723264db064e4b05008233a9c1f2f8aaaa.1671741278.git.marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
The assignment of dev->postcopy_ufd can be moved into an else clause and
then the code becomes C90 compliant.
CC libvhost-user.o
libvhost-user.c: In function ‘vu_set_postcopy_advise’:
libvhost-user.c:1625:5: error: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Werror=declaration-after-statement]
1625 | struct uffdio_api api_struct;
| ^~~~~~
Understandable, it might be desired to avoid else clauses, but in this
case it seems clear enough and frankly the dev->postcopy_ufd is only
assigned once.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <74db52afb1203c4580ffc7fa462b4b2ba260a353.1671741278.git.marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
When using libvhost-user source in an external project that wants to
comply with the C90 standard, it is best to declare variables before
code.
CC libvhost-user.o
libvhost-user.c: In function ‘generate_faults’:
libvhost-user.c:683:9: error: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Werror=declaration-after-statement]
683 | struct uffdio_register reg_struct;
| ^~~~~~
In this case, it is also simple enough and doesn't cause any extra
ifdef additions.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <556c2d00c01fa134d13c0371d4014c90694c2943.1671741278.git.marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
The sign-compare warning also hits some of the for-loops, but it easy
fixed by just making the iterator variable unsigned int.
CC libvhost-user.o
libvhost-user.c: In function ‘vu_gpa_to_va’:
libvhost-user.c:223:19: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘int’ and ‘uint32_t’ {aka ‘unsigned int’} [-Werror=sign-compare]
223 | for (i = 0; i < dev->nregions; i++) {
| ^
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Message-Id: <decb925e1a6fb9538738d2570bda2804f888fa15.1671741278.git.marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
The assert from recvmsg() return value against an uint32_t size field
from a protocol struct throws a compiler warning.
CC libvhost-user.o
In file included from libvhost-user.c:27:
libvhost-user.c: In function ‘vu_message_read_default’:
libvhost-user.c:363:19: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘int’ and ‘uint32_t’ {aka ‘unsigned int’} [-Werror=sign-compare]
363 | assert(rc == vmsg->size);
| ^~
This is not critical, but annoying when the libvhost-user source are
used in an external project that has this compiler warning switched on.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Message-Id: <7a791e27b7bd3e0a8b8cc8fbb15090a870d226d5.1671741278.git.marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Strictly speaking only -std=gnu99 support the usage of typeof and for
easier inclusion in external projects, it is better to use __typeof__.
CC libvhost-user.o
libvhost-user.c: In function ‘vu_log_queue_fill’:
libvhost-user.c:86:13: error: implicit declaration of function ‘typeof’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
86 | typeof(x) _min1 = (x); \
| ^~~~~~
Changing these two users of typeof makes the compiler happy and no extra
flags or pragmas need to be provided.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <981aa822bcaaa2b8d74f245339a99a85c25b346f.1671741278.git.marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Then the libvhost-user sources are used by another project, it can not
be guaranteed that _GNU_SOURCE is set by the build system. If it is for
example not set, errors like this show up.
CC libvhost-user.o
libvhost-user.c: In function ‘vu_panic’:
libvhost-user.c:195:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘vasprintf’; did you mean ‘vsprintf’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
195 | if (vasprintf(&buf, msg, ap) < 0) {
| ^~~~~~~~~
| vsprintf
The simplest way to allow external complication of libvhost-user.[ch] is
by setting _GNU_SOURCE if it is not already set by the build system.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Message-Id: <be27dcc747a6b5cc6f8ae3f79e0b79171382bcef.1671741278.git.marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
It seems there is no need to keep the inuse field signed and end up with
compiler warnings for sign-compare.
CC libvhost-user.o
libvhost-user.c: In function ‘vu_queue_pop’:
libvhost-user.c:2763:19: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘int’ and ‘unsigned int’ [-Werror=sign-compare]
2763 | if (vq->inuse >= vq->vring.num) {
| ^~
libvhost-user.c: In function ‘vu_queue_rewind’:
libvhost-user.c:2808:13: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘unsigned int’ and ‘int’ [-Werror=sign-compare]
2808 | if (num > vq->inuse) {
| ^
Instead of casting the comparision to unsigned int, just make the inuse
field unsigned int in the fist place.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Message-Id: <20221219175337.377435-8-marcel@holtmann.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
This fix is required for 32 bit hosts. The bug was detected by CI
for arm-linux, but is also relevant for i386-linux.
Reported-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221126152507.283271-4-sw@weilnetz.de>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Message-Id: <20220422070144.1043697-2-sw@weilnetz.de>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221126152507.283271-2-sw@weilnetz.de>
With REPLY_NEEDED, libvhost-user sends both the acutal result and an
additional ACK reply for VHOST_USER_ADD_MEM_REG. This is incorrect, the
spec mandates that it behave the same with and without REPLY_NEEDED
because it always sends a reply.
Fixes: ec94c8e621
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220627134500.94842-4-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
With REPLY_NEEDED, libvhost-user sends both the acutal result and an
additional ACK reply for VHOST_USER_GET_MAX_MEM_SLOTS. This is
incorrect, the spec mandates that it behave the same with and without
REPLY_NEEDED because it always sends a reply.
Fixes: 6fb2e173d2
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220627134500.94842-3-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
This is useful for more human readable debug messages in vhost-user
programs.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220321153037.3622127-9-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
The spec clarifies now that QEMU should not send a file descriptor in a
request to remove a memory region. Change it accordingly.
For libvhost-user, this is a bug fix that makes it compatible with
rust-vmm's implementation that doesn't send a file descriptor. Keep
accepting, but ignoring a file descriptor for compatibility with older
QEMU versions.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220407133657.155281-4-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Outside of postcopy mode, neither VHOST_USER_ADD_MEM_REG nor
VHOST_USER_REM_MEM_REG are supposed to send a reply unless explicitly
requested with the need_reply flag. Their current implementation always
sends a reply, even if it isn't requested. This confuses the master
because it will interpret the reply as a reply for the next message for
which it actually expects a reply.
need_reply is already handled correctly by vu_dispatch(), so just don't
send a reply in the non-postcopy part of the message handler for these
two commands.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220407133657.155281-3-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
For fd-based shared memory, MAP_NORESERVE is only effective for hugetlb,
otherwise it's ignored. Older Linux versions that didn't support
reservation of huge pages ignored MAP_NORESERVE completely.
The first client to mmap a hugetlb fd without MAP_NORESERVE will
trigger reservation of huge pages for the whole mmapped range. There are
two cases to consider:
1) QEMU mapped RAM without MAP_NORESERVE
We're not dealing with a sparse mapping, huge pages for the whole range
have already been reserved by QEMU. An additional mmap() without
MAP_NORESERVE won't have any effect on the reservation.
2) QEMU mapped RAM with MAP_NORESERVE
We're delaing with a sparse mapping, no huge pages should be reserved.
Further mappings without MAP_NORESERVE should be avoided.
For 1), it doesn't matter if we set MAP_NORESERVE or not, so we can
simply set it. For 2), we'd be overriding QEMUs decision and trigger
reservation of huge pages, which might just fail if there are not
sufficient huge pages around. We must map with MAP_NORESERVE.
This change is required to support virtio-mem with hugetlb: a
virtio-mem device mapped into the guest physical memory corresponds to
a sparse memory mapping and QEMU maps this memory with MAP_NORESERVE.
Whenever memory in that sparse region will be accessed by the VM, QEMU
populates huge pages for the affected range by preallocating memory
and handling any preallocation errors gracefully.
So let's map shared RAM with MAP_NORESERVE. As libvhost-user only
supports Linux, there shouldn't be anything to take care of in regard of
other OS support.
Without this change, libvhost-user will fail mapping the region if there
are currently not enough huge pages to perform the reservation:
fv_panic: libvhost-user: region mmap error: Cannot allocate memory
Cc: "Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220111123939.132659-1-david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
Today if QEMU (or any other VMM) has sent multiple copies of the same
region to a libvhost-user based backend and then attempts to remove the
region, only one instance of the region will be removed, leaving stale
copies of the region in dev->regions[].
This change resolves this by having vu_rem_mem_reg() iterate through all
regions in dev->regions[] and delete all matching regions.
Suggested-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
Message-Id: <20220117041050.19718-7-raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
When VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_CONFIGURE_MEM_SLOTS support was added to
libvhost-user, no guardrails were added to protect against QEMU
attempting to hot-add too many RAM slots to a VM with a libvhost-user
based backed attached.
This change adds the missing error handling by introducing a check on
the number of RAM slots the device has available before proceeding to
process the VHOST_USER_ADD_MEM_REG message.
Suggested-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
Message-Id: <20220117041050.19718-6-raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
We end up not closing the file descriptor, resulting in leaking one
file descriptor for each VHOST_USER_REM_MEM_REG message.
Fixes: 875b9fd97b ("Support individual region unmap in libvhost-user")
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
Cc: "Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
Message-Id: <20220117041050.19718-5-raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Let's avoid having to manually copy all elements. Copy only the ones
necessary to close the hole and perform the operation in-place without
a second array.
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
Message-Id: <20220117041050.19718-4-raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Today if multiple FDs are sent from the VMM to the backend in a
VHOST_USER_ADD_MEM_REG message, one FD will be mapped and the remaining
FDs will be leaked. Therefore if multiple FDs are sent we report an
error and fail the operation, closing all FDs in the message.
Likewise in case the VMM sends a message with a size less than that
of a memory region descriptor, we add a check to gracefully report an
error and fail the operation rather than crashing.
Signed-off-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
Message-Id: <20220117041050.19718-3-raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Today if multiple FDs are sent from the VMM to the backend in a
VHOST_USER_REM_MEM_REG message, one FD will be unmapped and the remaining
FDs will be leaked. Therefore if multiple FDs are sent we report an
error and fail the operation, closing all FDs in the message.
Likewise in case the VMM sends a message with a size less than that of a
memory region descriptor, we add a check to gracefully report an error
and fail the operation rather than crashing.
Signed-off-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
Message-Id: <20220117041050.19718-2-raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
We end up not copying the mmap_addr of all existing regions, resulting
in a SEGFAULT once we actually try to map/access anything within our
memory regions.
Fixes: 875b9fd97b ("Support individual region unmap in libvhost-user")
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
Cc: "Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20211011201047.62587-1-david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
../subprojects/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c:1070:12: error: format ‘%lx’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 3 has type ‘__u64’ {aka ‘long long unsigned int’} [-Werror=format=]
1070 | DPRINT(" desc_user_addr: 0x%016" PRIx64 "\n", vra->desc_user_addr);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| __u64 {aka long long unsigned int}
Rather than using %llx, which may fail if __u64 is declared differently
elsewhere, let's just cast the values. Feel free to propose a better solution!
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210505151313.203258-2-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Meson now checks that subprojects do not access files from parent
project. While we all agree this is best practice, libvhost-user also
want to share a few headers with QEMU, and libvhost-user isn't really a
standalone project at this point (although this is making the dependency
a bit more explicit).
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210505151313.203258-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This help fixing static compilation issues.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210114125605.1227742-4-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Musl libc complains about it's wrong usage.
In file included from ../subprojects/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.h:20,
from ../subprojects/libvhost-user/libvhost-user-glib.h:19,
from ../subprojects/libvhost-user/libvhost-user-glib.c:15:
/usr/include/sys/poll.h:1:2: error: #warning redirecting incorrect #include <sys/poll.h> to <poll.h> [-Werror=cpp]
1 | #warning redirecting incorrect #include <sys/poll.h> to <poll.h>
| ^~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210118063808.12471-3-jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201125100640.366523-8-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
By making libvhost-user a subproject, check it builds
standalone (without the global QEMU cflags etc).
Note that the library still relies on QEMU include/qemu/atomic.h and
linux_headers/.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201125100640.366523-6-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
