The ELF V2 ABI for PPC64 defines MINSIGSTKSZ as 4096 bytes whereas it was
2048 previously.
Signed-off-by: Tom Musta <tommusta@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
Popular glibc based distributions[1] require minimum
2.6.32 as kernel version. For some targets 2.6.18
would be enough, but dropping so low would mean some
suboptimal system calls could get used.
Set the minimum kernel advertized to 2.6.32 for
all architectures but aarch64 to ensure working qemu
linux-user in case host kernel is older.
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/921078
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
Creating target_structs header in linux-user/$arch/ and making
target_ipc_perm and target_shmid_ds its first inhabitants.
The struct defintions may/should be further fine-tuned by arch maintainers.
Signed-off-by: Petar Jovanovic <petar.jovanovic@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
The functions cpu_clone_regs() and cpu_set_tls() are not purely CPU
related -- they are specific to the TLS ABI for a a particular OS.
Move them into the linux-user/ tree where they belong.
target-lm32 had entirely unused implementations, since it has no
linux-user target; just drop them.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
accidently->accidentally
annother->another
choosen->chosen
consideres->considers
decriptor->descriptor
developement->development
paramter->parameter
preceed->precede
preceeding->preceding
priviledge->privilege
propogation->propagation
substraction->subtraction
throught->through
upto->up to
usefull->useful
Fix also grammar in posix-aio-compat.c
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Add syscall numbers for new syscall numbers; this brings us
into line with Linux 2.6.39.2.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
In the very least, a change like this requires discussion on the list.
The naming convention is goofy and it causes a massive merge problem. Something
like this _must_ be presented on the list first so people can provide input
and cope with it.
This reverts commit 99a0949b72.
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
