If maintainers are currently pushing to a branch called "staging"
in their repository, they are ending up with some stuck jobs - unless
they have a s390x CI runner machine available. That's ugly, we should
make sure that the related jobs are really only started if such a
runner is available. So let's only run these jobs if it's the
"staging" branch of the main repository of the QEMU project (where
we can be sure that the s390x runner is available), or if the user
explicitly set a S390X_RUNNER_AVAILABLE variable in their CI configs
to declare that they have such a runner available, too.
Fixes: 4799c21023 ("Jobs based on custom runners: add job definitions ...")
Message-Id: <20210728173857.497523-1-thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Willian Rampazzo <willianr@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
The QEMU project has two machines (aarch64 and s390x) that can be used
for jobs that do build and run tests. This introduces those jobs,
which are a mapping of custom scripts used for the same purpose.
Signed-off-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Willian Rampazzo <willianr@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Wainer dos Santos Moschetta <wainersm@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210630012619.115262-5-crosa@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210709143005.1554-5-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
As described in the included documentation, the "custom runner" jobs
extend the GitLab CI jobs already in place. One of their primary
goals of catching and preventing regressions on a wider number of host
systems than the ones provided by GitLab's shared runners.
This sets the stage in which other community members can add their own
machine configuration documentation/scripts, and accompanying job
definitions. As a general rule, those newly added contributed jobs
should run as "non-gating", until their reliability is verified (AKA
"allow_failure: true").
Signed-off-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Willian Rampazzo <willianr@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Wainer dos Santos Moschetta <wainersm@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210630012619.115262-2-crosa@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210709143005.1554-2-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
