In thunk_type_align() and thunk_type_size() we currently return
-1 if the value at the type_ptr isn't one of the TYPE_* values
we understand. However, this should never happen, and if it does
then the calling code will go confusingly wrong because none
of the callsites try to handle an error return. Switch to an
assertion instead, so that if this does somehow happen we'll have
a nice clear backtrace of what happened rather than a weird crash
or misbehaviour.
This also silences various Coverity complaints about not handling
the negative return value (CID 1005735, 1005736, 1005738, 1390582).
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Message-Id: <20180514174616.19601-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Since commit 8efb2ed5ec ("linux-user: Correct signedness of
target_flock l_start and l_len fields"), flock64 structure uses
abi_llong for l_start and l_len in place of "unsigned long long"
this should force them to be aligned accordingly to the target
rules. So we can remove the padding field and the QEMU_PACKED
attribute.
I have compared the result of the following program before and
after the change:
cat -> flock64_dump <<EOF
p/d sizeof(struct target_flock64)
p/d &((struct target_flock64 *)0)->l_type
p/d &((struct target_flock64 *)0)->l_whence
p/d &((struct target_flock64 *)0)->l_start
p/d &((struct target_flock64 *)0)->l_len
p/d &((struct target_flock64 *)0)->l_pid
quit
EOF
for file in build/all/*-linux-user/qemu-* ; do
echo $file
gdb -batch -nx -x flock64_dump $file 2> /dev/null
done
The sizeof() changes because we remove the QEMU_PACKED.
The new size is 32 (except for i386 and m68k) and this is
the real size of "struct flock64" on the target architecture.
The following architectures differ:
aarch64_be, aarch64, alpha, armeb, arm, cris, hppa, nios2, or1k,
riscv32, riscv64, s390x.
For a subset of these architectures, I have checked with the following
program the new structure is the correct one:
#include <stdio.h>
#define __USE_LARGEFILE64
#include <fcntl.h>
int main(void)
{
printf("struct flock64 %d\n", sizeof(struct flock64));
printf("l_type %d\n", &((struct flock64 *)0)->l_type);
printf("l_whence %d\n", &((struct flock64 *)0)->l_whence);
printf("l_start %d\n", &((struct flock64 *)0)->l_start);
printf("l_len %d\n", &((struct flock64 *)0)->l_len);
printf("l_pid %d\n", &((struct flock64 *)0)->l_pid);
}
[I have checked aarch64, alpha, hppa, s390x]
For ARM, the target_flock64 becomes the EABI definition, so we need to
define the OABI one in place of the EABI one and use it when it is
needed.
I have also fixed the alignment value for sh4 (to align llong on 4 bytes)
(see c2e3dee6e0 "linux-user: Define target alignment size")
[We should check alignment properties for cris, nios2 and or1k]
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20180502215730.28162-1-laurent@vivier.eu>
For i386, the ABI specifies that 'long long' (8 byte values)
need only be 4 aligned, but we were requiring them to be
8-aligned. This meant we were laying out the target_epoll_event
structure wrongly. Add a suitable ifdef to abitypes.h to
specify the i386-specific alignment requirement.
Reported-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.xyz>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
Header guard symbols should match their file name to make guard
collisions less likely. Offenders found with
scripts/clean-header-guards.pl -vn.
Cleaned up with scripts/clean-header-guards.pl, followed by some
renaming of new guard symbols picked by the script to better ones.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
The target_to_host_bitmask() and host_to_target_bitmask() functions
and the associated struct bitmask_transtbl are completely generic,
but for historical reasons the target related fields and parameters
are named 'x86' and the host related fields are named 'alpha'.
Rename them to 'target' and 'host'.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
The thunk_type_size_array() and thunk_type_align_array() functions
are only provided if NO_THUNK_TYPE_SIZE is not defined. However
nothing in the codebase defines that, and so in fact these functions
are always present. Drop the unnecessary #ifdefs.
(Over a decade ago thunk.h used to be included by some softmmu
files, which defined NO_THUNK_TYPE_SIZE, but these includes are
long gone; see for instance commit f193c7979c2f7.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Clean up includes so that osdep.h is included first and headers
which it implies are not included manually.
This commit was created with scripts/clean-includes.
NB: If this commit breaks compilation for your out-of-tree
patchseries or fork, then you need to make sure you add
#include "qemu/osdep.h" to any new .c files that you have.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
We store all struct types in an array of static size without ever
checking whether we overrun it. Of course some day someone (like me
in another, ancient ALSA enabling patch set) will run into the limit
without realizing it.
So let's make the allocation dynamic. We already know the number of
structs that we want to allocate, so we only need to pass the variable
into the respective piece of code.
Also, to ensure we don't accidently overwrite random memory, add some
asserts to sanity check whether a thunk is actually part of our array.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
The ARM EABI specifies that 64 bit integers should be
8 aligned; remove our incorrect setting of 4 alignment.
This has no actual effect since it only set the alignment
for the 'abi_ullong' and 'abi_llong' types, which are used
only inside code which is MIPS-specific, but it will
avoid problems later if we use the types elsewhere.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The alignment is a characteristic of the ABI, not the CPU.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>
Previously, this was done for target_long/ulong, and propagated to
abi_long/ulong via a typedef. But target_long/ulong should not
have any specific alignment, it is never used to access guest
memory.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>
The alignment is a characteristic of the ABI, not the CPU.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>
The alignment is a characteristic of the ABI, not the CPU.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>
