This adds a test for reentering a coroutine that previously yielded to a
coroutine that has meanwhile terminated.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
unsigned long is not large enough to represent 1000000000 * duration there.
Just use floating point.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Message-id: 1417518350-6167-4-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
This test runs dummy function with coroutine by using
two enter and one yield since which is a common usage.
So we can see the cost introduced by corouting for running
one function, for example:
Run operation 20000000 iterations 4.841071 s, 4131K operations/s
242ns per coroutine
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This can be used to compute the cost of coroutine operations. In the
end the cost of the function call is a few clock cycles, so it's pretty
cheap for now, but it may become more relevant as the coroutine code
is optimized.
For example, here are the results on my machine:
Function call 100000000 iterations: 0.173884 s
Yield 100000000 iterations: 8.445064 s
Lifecycle 1000000 iterations: 0.098445 s
Nesting 10000 iterations of 1000 depth each: 7.406431 s
One yield takes 83 nanoseconds, one enter takes 97 nanoseconds,
one coroutine allocation takes (roughly, since some of the allocations
in the nesting test do hit the pool) 739 nanoseconds:
(8.445064 - 0.173884) * 10^9 / 100000000 = 82.7
(0.098445 * 100 - 0.173884) * 10^9 / 100000000 = 96.7
(7.406431 * 10 - 0.173884) * 10^9 / 100000000 = 738.9
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This patch adds a test for coroutine execution order in test-coroutine -
this catches a bug in the CPC coroutine implementation.
Signed-off-by: Charlie Shepherd <charlie@ctshepherd.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
The /perf/nesting benchmark is broken because the counters are
not reset after each iteration. Therefore, nesting is done only
on the first iteration, and skipped on every other.
This patch fixes the issue, and reduces the number of iterations
to make it possible to run the benchmark in a reasonable amount of
time.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Kerneis <gabriel@kerneis.info>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Current coroutine performance benchmarks test only coroutine creation,
either directly or in a nested way. This patch adds a benchmark to
evaluate the performance of qemu_coroutine_yield.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Kerneis <gabriel@kerneis.info>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
20000 nested coroutines require 20 GB of virtual address space.
Only nest 1000 of them so that the test (only enabled with
"-m perf" on the command line) runs on 32-bit machines too.
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This introduces new test reporting infrastructure based on
gtester and gtester-report.
Also, all existing tests are moved to tests/, and tests/Makefile
is reorganized to factor out the commonalities in the rules.
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
