target/arm: Diagnose incorrect usage of arm_is_secure subroutines
In several places we use arm_is_secure_below_el3 and arm_is_el3_or_mon separately from arm_is_secure. These functions make no sense for m-profile, and would indicate prior incorrect feature testing. Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Message-id: 20230227225832.816605-4-richard.henderson@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a0262ba68c
commit
fcc7404eff
@ -2384,7 +2384,8 @@ static inline int arm_feature(CPUARMState *env, int feature)
|
||||
void arm_cpu_finalize_features(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp);
|
||||
|
||||
#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
|
||||
/* Return true if exception levels below EL3 are in secure state,
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Return true if exception levels below EL3 are in secure state,
|
||||
* or would be following an exception return to that level.
|
||||
* Unlike arm_is_secure() (which is always a question about the
|
||||
* _current_ state of the CPU) this doesn't care about the current
|
||||
@ -2392,6 +2393,7 @@ void arm_cpu_finalize_features(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp);
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline bool arm_is_secure_below_el3(CPUARMState *env)
|
||||
{
|
||||
assert(!arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_M));
|
||||
if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL3)) {
|
||||
return !(env->cp15.scr_el3 & SCR_NS);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
@ -2405,6 +2407,7 @@ static inline bool arm_is_secure_below_el3(CPUARMState *env)
|
||||
/* Return true if the CPU is AArch64 EL3 or AArch32 Mon */
|
||||
static inline bool arm_is_el3_or_mon(CPUARMState *env)
|
||||
{
|
||||
assert(!arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_M));
|
||||
if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL3)) {
|
||||
if (is_a64(env) && extract32(env->pstate, 2, 2) == 3) {
|
||||
/* CPU currently in AArch64 state and EL3 */
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user